US Georgia DA Fani Willis had affair with prosecutor on Trump case: lawsuit

1704810410511.png1704810463218.png

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had an “improper” and “clandestine” relationship with the married special prosecutor who assisted in securing the Georgia grand jury indictment against former President Donald Trump, a co-defendant in the election interference case alleged Monday.

The bombshell court filing made by former Trump 2020 campaign official Michael Roman argues that Willis should be disqualified from the case and the charges against him dropped because “the district attorney chose to appoint her romantic partner, who at all times relevant to this prosecution has been a married man,” to the case.

Roman contends that Nathan Wade, a private attorney with the Atlanta-based Wade & Campbell Firm, used some of the nearly $654,000 in legal fees that he’s been paid by the Fulton County DA’s Office for his work on the Trump case to take Willis on lavish vacations to “Napa Valley, California, Florida and the Caribbean.”

“Mr. Roman … moves the Court for an order disqualifying the district attorney, her office, and the special prosecutor from further prosecuting the instant matter on the grounds that the district attorney and the special prosecutor have been engaged in an improper, clandestine personal relationship during the pendency of this case, which has resulted in the special prosecutor, and, in turn, the district attorney, profiting significantly from this prosecution at the expense of the taxpayers,” the 127-page filing states.

“Accordingly, the district attorney and the special prosecutor have violated laws regulating the use of public monies, suffer from irreparable conflicts of interest, and have violated their oaths of office under the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct and should be disqualified from prosecuting this matter,” it continues.

Roman’s filing claims that “sources close to both the special prosecutor and the district attorney” have confirmed that Willis and Wade had an ongoing fling, and that Wade filed for divorce in Cobb County, Ga., “a day after his first contract with Willis commenced” in November 2021.

“In addition, the district attorney and the special prosecutor have been seen in private together (in a personal relationship capacity) in and about the Atlanta area and believed to have co-habited in some form or fashion at a location that neither of them owned,” the filing alleges.
https://nypost.com/2024/01/08/news/...prosecutor-demands-indictment-be-thrown-out/#
The motion argues that Willis’ failure to disclose her alleged relationship with Wade while paying him for his work on the Trump case with funds that he allegedly used to vacation with the DA could amount to honest services fraud as well as “a predicate act which could result in a RICO charge against both the district attorney and the special prosecutor.”

Trump, 77, and Roman were both hit with racketeering charges in Willis’ case against them and 17 other co-defendants under Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

Roman served as the Trump re-election campaign’s director of Election Day operations in 2020.

In the wake of the former president’s 2020 loss, Roman allegedly joined an effort to put forward slates of pro-Trump “fake electors” to reject President-elect Joe Biden’s victories in key swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada.

He was charged with seven felony counts last August by the Georgia grand jury convened by Willis.

Wade and the Fulton County DA’s Office did not immediately respond to The Post’s requests for comment.

https://nypost.com/2024/01/08/news/trump-co-defendant-alleges-improper-relationship-between-georgia-da-and-prosecutor-demands-indictment-be-thrown-out/ (Archive)
 

Attachments

  • 1704810197639.png
    1704810197639.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 1
  • 1704810315523.png
    1704810315523.png
    209.5 KB · Views: 1
Jesus fucking Christ.

I don't really care about the affair because I always thought Gary Hart got a raw deal. But come the fuck on.

Are these people capable of being honest?? (rhetorical question) And they want to rip our laws and norms apart.

*to clarify, I do care about the conflict of interest.
 
Last edited:
In the wake of the former president’s 2020 loss, Roman allegedly joined an effort to put forward slates of pro-Trump “fake electors” to reject President-elect Joe Biden’s victories in key swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada.

Dems have been trying to get electors to falsely vote for their candidates since the 60's. Dem electors are such flakes that they semi-regularly vote for meme people instead of their candidate. One of Hillary's did way back in 2016.

I'm quite sure they'll try again in 2024 to 'get electors to vote their conscience'. Good luck, you're not an elector because you're a free-thinker, it's given to faithful party workers almost exclusively as a reward for decades of grunt work. Both parties do that, btw.
 
why is nobody from Lawtube covering this?
it could be their next cashcow but i son't see them on it at all
its pretty messy to follow. all anyone has is 1 witness with a potential grudge saying she saw them dating in 2019. the other guy who would've saw it is clinging to attourney client privilege. all the illegal money shit is for the IRS to investigate (they won't). Willis blew her top yesterday but shes not budging on the relationship.
 
Apparently she said at one point that she is not aware about the need for disclosure. I don't even like Trump, but even that is texbook faux pas in the workplace, and it's a wonder she didn't get fired.
She was so assmad about the testimony she ran to the courtroom where she originally wasn't goingt to appear with her dress on backwards and made a massive fool of herself. It was pretty kino, ngl.
 
So the DAs office burned down a witness because they are retarded...
they had some decent plan to destroy a witness, the problem is that they used that plan even after the witness turned out to be their best asset...
 
You can't bring up a video stream when both hands are full of alcohol.
Oh, how the mighty have fallen...
So the DAs office burned down a witness because they are retarded...
they had some decent plan to destroy a witness, the problem is that they used that plan even after the witness turned out to be their best asset...
We're not being ruled by evil geniuses. We're being ruled by evil morons.

The real question then is... what the fuck does that make us?
 
Willis must step aside, or fire Nathan Wade

Judge rules Fani Willis must step aside from Trump case or fire special prosecutor Nathan Wade​

Judge McAfee rules on motion to disqualify Fulton County DA Fani Willis from Trump case​

By Brianna Herlihy Fox News
Published March 15, 2024 9:05am EDT Updated March 15, 2024 9:10am EDT

A Georgia judge has ruled that embattled Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must either step aside from the case against former President Donald Trump or fire special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued the ruling after hearing evidence presented by lawyers for the co-defendants in the sweeping 2020 election interference case. Four co-defendants accused Willis of having an "improper" affair with Nathan Wade, whom she hired to help prosecute the case.

McAfee said that the defendants "failed to meet their burden of proving that the District Attorney acquired an actual conflict of interest in this case through her personal relationship and recurring travels with her lead prosecutor."

"However, the established record now highlights a significant appearance of impropriety that infects the current structure of the prosecution team – an appearance that must be removed through the State’s selection of one of two options," he wrote.

McAfee said that "[w]ithout sufficient evidence that the District Attorney acquired a personal stake in the prosecution, or that her financial arrangements had any impact on the case, the Defendants’ claims of an actual conflict must be denied."

But he went on to say that his finding is "by no means an indication that the Court condones this tremendous lapse in judgment or the unprofessional manner of the District Attorney’s testimony during the evidentiary hearing."

"Rather, it is the undersigned’s opinion that Georgia law does not permit the finding of an actual conflict for simply making bad choices – even repeatedly – and it is the trial court’s duty to confine itself to the relevant issues and applicable law properly brought before it," he siad.

"Other forums or sources of authority such as the General Assembly, the Georgia State Ethics Commission, the State Bar of Georgia, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, or the voters of Fulton County may offer feedback on any unanswered questions that linger. But those are not the issues determinative to the Defendants’ motions alleging an actual conflict," he added.

The co-defendants had alleged that Willis benefited financially by hiring Wade because they were in a pre-existing relationship when he was hired in 2021 and would vacation together.

Both Wade and Willis denied they were in a romantic relationship prior to his hiring and that the couple would split the costs of their shared travels; Willis said she reimbursed Wade for her share of the trips in cash.

In his Friday order, McAfee said while Willis' "reimbursement practice" was "unusual and the lack of any documentary corroboration understandably concerning," he ultimately decided that the defendants did not present "sufficient evidence" that expenses weren't "roughly divided evenly."

He also said that "the evidence demonstrated that the financial gain flowing from her relationship with Wade was not a motivating factor on the part of the District Attorney to indict and prosecute this case."

Last month, Judge McAfee held a two-day evidentiary hearing where the defense, led by attorney Ashley Merchant, set out to expose a money trail that would mean Willis has a conflict of interest in the case against Trump and should be disqualified.

"[T]he Court finds that the record made at the evidentiary hearing established that the District Attorney’s prosecution is encumbered by an appearance of impropriety," McAfee wrote in his order.

"As the case moves forward, reasonable members of the public could easily be left to wonder whether the financial exchanges have continued resulting in some form of benefit to the District Attorney, or even whether the romantic relationship has resumed.

"Put differently, an outsider could reasonably think that the District Attorney is not exercising her independent professional judgment totally free of any compromising influences. As long as Wade remains on the case, this unnecessary perception will persist," he said.

Both Willis and Wade insisted that their relationship started in 2022, after Wade was hired. But they contradict testimony from Robin Yeartie, a former "good friend" of Willis and past employee at the DA's office.

Yeartie said she had "no doubt" that Willis and Wade's relationship started in 2019, after the two met at a conference.

Yeartie testified to observing Willis and Wade "hugging" and "kissing" and showing "affection" prior to November 2021, and that she had no doubt that the two were in a "romantic" relationship starting in 2019, to when she and Willis last spoke in 2022.

Willis dismissed Yeartie’s testimony and said she no longer considers Yeartie to be a friend.

Judge McAfee in Friday's order said that "while the testimony of Robin Yearti raised doubts about the State’s assertions, it ultimately lacked context and detail."

"[N]either side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one," he said.

The highlight of the two-day proceeding was Willis’ own – an unexpected – testimony last month, described by one expert as "belligerent."


She verbally sparred with lawyers for hours, at one point, prompting the judge to threaten to strike her testimony. She also raised eyebrows for appearing to be wearing her dress backwards.

Former law firm partner and divorce attorney for Nathan Wade, Terrence Bradley, testified last month about what he knew about Willis' and Wade's relationship after McAfee determined he couldn't claim attorney-client privilege.

Bradley, when pressed under oath, said he couldn't recall several details and timelines about conversations he had with former client Wade about Wade's romantic relationship with Willis.

Merchant at one point referenced text messages between her and Bradley in which she had asked Bradley if he thought the relationship started before Willis hired Wade in 2021. Bradley responded "absolutely" in the text exchange.

On Wednesday, Judge McAfee issued a ruling that quashed six counts in the Georgia election interference case against former President Donald Trump and his 18 co-defendants. Saying that the state failed to allege sufficient detail for "solicitation of violation of oath by public officer."

Trump wins again.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Backpack Knight
She paid her fuckboy 700k and profited on the hire. That is embezzlement. Not going to mention it?
if she dumps Wade she can still prosecute trump.
He already resigned. Even if Trump loses the grounds for appeal are so fertile.

Even in clown world these cases are so unlikely to stick it is kind of unreal.
 
Back