RPGnet Forums

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Something about this trend seems... off. It's more than just wokesterism. It's... it's like they're claiming a zone online to no longer be about the topic it once was, but now just about wokeshit, exclusively. I don't know. Something about it sets me off.

Have any of you noticed this as well?
Yeah, there's an history sperg on YT who pulled this. I know that I've seen it elsewhere, recently; just can't recall exactly what it was.

Edit: Yeah, it was Wookieepedia, of all places, that did that.
 
Last edited:
There's something I want to bring up: the perma-Pride logo.

View attachment 5626439

I brought it up in another thread. I noticed a lot of places are doing this now. They put their Pride flag up in June, and then just never take it down. Ever. It's Pride Year.

So far I've seen it in a few places:
  • The rpg.net forums
  • The gzDoom Discord
  • The Chronicles of Darkness Discord
  • various other places that I can't recall
Something about this trend seems... off. It's more than just wokesterism. It's... it's like they're claiming a zone online to no longer be about the topic it once was, but now just about wokeshit, exclusively. I don't know. Something about it sets me off.

Have any of you noticed this as well?
The purpose of a flag is to mark ownership. Rpg.net is sovereign tranny territory and you will abide by their laws or be expelled. It's far more important to them that they be openly and visibly trans friendly than that they grow their site by tolerating political differences. Extremist ideologies demand total obedience.
 
The purpose of a flag is to mark ownership. Rpg.net is sovereign tranny territory and you will abide by their laws or be expelled. It's far more important to them that they be openly and visibly trans friendly than that they grow their site by tolerating political differences. Extremist ideologies demand total obedience.
Right, that's exactly what I mean. They're demarcating it as a tranny zone first, and an RPG forum second. And you can swap it out with any of these other things like the chat rooms I listed. Thing is, for a while they would just take the Pride flag down after June.

But the pattern I noticed, of leaving the flag up permanently. I feel like it's going a step further than merely making it an RPG forum (or whatever else) second. I feel like it's going into the territory of making it only nominally about the original topic. Like they will only barely even bother talking about the stated topic.

I can't put my finger on exactly what it is but leaving the Pride flag up indefinitely just strikes me as an escalation of sorts.
 
Have any of you noticed this as well?
Yeah, that shit is on the Eberron discord as well...

Eberron_discord.png
 
View attachment 5626726
The official Lancer discord does away with the pretense and just makes its banner the trans flag. However, appealing to the trans community makes sense in this case because they're the only demographic that plays Lancer.
Because of the devs or is there some other reason? Never played Lancer but I've heard it's actually a functional game and not just outrage bait like Meatpunk or Stigmata.
 
Because of the devs or is there some other reason? Never played Lancer but I've heard it's actually a functional game and not just outrage bait like Meatpunk or Stigmata.
Lancer isn't a mech game, it's just D&D 4e but reskinned to be about mechs instead of fantasy. The setting itself is what attracts trannies, because it is unironic Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism. Everyone is gay, everyone is trans, and everyone is communist except for the bad guys, who are cackling evil robber barons. Nothing about the setting makes any sense if you look at it for more than five seconds (like how there's no money because it's communism, and mechs are 3D printed en masse, but you need to pay a software license to build them, but there's no money because it's communism etc).

This is not a minor issue, either. The first (and therefore most popular) campaign for Lancer, No Room for a Wallflower, is about defending a city under attack from evil capitalists, and the ENTIRE CAMPAIGN falls apart if one party member says, "hey wait a second, this town has 3D mech printers. Why don't we just make one mech for everyone?" The best explanation the GM is given is "software license fees," but then that raises the question of how they're paid if there's no money. It's a shitshow.

The most important thing to remember about Massif Press, or anything else by Abbadon (Tom Parkinson-Morgan, formerly Tom Bloom) is that he's all style, no substance. Kill Six Billion Demons isn't about the main character, it's about Tom trying and failing to one-up Wayne Barlowe's depiction of Hell because he got bored of drawing feeder porn on /d/. Lancer isn't a mech game, it's Tom wanting to draw mechs because he got bored of drawing demons and caught a bad case of communism. ICON isn't about being a fantasy TTRPG, it's about Tom wanting to draw fantasy creatures because he got bored of drawing mechs and stapled Powered by the Apocalypse mechanics onto Lancer because he's a hack. Maleghast isn't about being a board game, it's about Tom wanting to draw in a softened faux-black-metal style because he got bored of drawing fantasy creatures and he wanted to cash in on the kind of retards that like Mork Borg.
 
Last edited:
This is not a minor issue, either. The first (and therefore most popular) campaign for Lancer, No Room for a Wallflower, is about defending a city under attack from evil capitalists, and the ENTIRE CAMPAIGN falls apart if one party member says, "hey wait a second, this town has 3D mech printers. Why don't we just make one mech for everyone?" The best explanation the GM is given is "software license fees," but then that raises the question of how they're paid if there's no money. It's a shitshow.

Imagine if the tank crews of WW2 had to pay the state a "license fee" before they could hop into their tanks, the Revolution, Stalin and continued existence of the USSR be damned.

I did devise a fix for this while taking a walk earlier: in lieu of money, make verbal bullshit and gaming the bureaucracy the way to acquire gear. fill out requisitions, trade favors, sweet-talk people in the commissariat, nurture a friendship with a corrupt quartermaster somewhere. Beg, borrow or steal shit and make sure you succeed or else it's the fully automated space gay gulag for you.

This would, however, be too nuanced for these people.

Hell, i'd explain away the inability to equip everyone with mechs by simple logistics: either there aren't enough mechs (everything goes to the front lines) or not enough raw materials. Want a mech? steal one or go hijack a cargo hauler full of steel and bring it here, and we'll see what we can do.
Connect this to the favor trading and bureaucracy gaming and it could become interesting.

Once again, too nuanced for these people.
 
It only takes a little brain juice to come up with a better system than what's presented. Comrade AI that controls the mech printer has certain rationing protocols, or only gives mechs to people with a correct social credit score who haven't made any capitalist pig posts on space twitter, etc. Post-scarcity settings have a real struggle for that sort of thing; Eclipse Phase had basically Star Trek replicators and had to jump through a lot of hoops to try to claim that a bunch of communities were using facebook likes for money or shit like that.
 
That's because it's a stupid fantasy. Even in Star Trek, eternal poster child of a post-scarcity setup, people can't just whistle up a starship for free; there's still some scarcity in skilled labor if not in raw material. Something I consider much more interesting is post-scarcity poverty, a setup where sure, you'll get fed and housed, but the food is barely-flavored protein cubes, the housing is a bulk-printed apartment block with 300 square feet per family, the clothes are plasticky sheets churned out of a machine, etc.
 
Something I consider much more interesting is post-scarcity poverty, a setup where...
Ever read the short story Manna by Marshall Brain? It's basically what you're describing - 99.9% of people live like that and can't even kill themselves 'cause AI doesn't allow that, the other 0.1% own everything and sue each other out of boredom, then one guy buys Australia and invites people to use all that tech for something more interesting.
 
Right, that's exactly what I mean. They're demarcating it as a tranny zone first, and an RPG forum second. And you can swap it out with any of these other things like the chat rooms I listed. Thing is, for a while they would just take the Pride flag down after June.

But the pattern I noticed, of leaving the flag up permanently. I feel like it's going a step further than merely making it an RPG forum (or whatever else) second. I feel like it's going into the territory of making it only nominally about the original topic. Like they will only barely even bother talking about the stated topic.

I can't put my finger on exactly what it is but leaving the Pride flag up indefinitely just strikes me as an escalation of sorts.
It's called gentrification. Pushing out all the people who were already there so the "better" people can move in and pretty up the place.

Tax:
1.png

It's not extremely close, but it's close enough to be fodder for authoritarian regimes. Both conflicts involve a larger power claiming ancestral and ethno-religious dominion over a territory that is also claimed by a smaller ethnic group, which the larger group refuses to acknowledge has any kind of inherent ethnic or national identity. Both conflicts involve widespread bombardment of civilian areas by the larger power, ostensibly to root out terrorist elements (Hamas in the case of Israel, and "Nazis" in the case of Russia) and atrocities against civilians justified as necessary to remove the ability of the smaller group to take action while claiming that the smaller group is responsible for their own civilian casualties. Both conflicts also involve a pseudo-dictatorial strongman in charge of the larger polity whose continued well-being (physical in the case of Putin, legal in the case of Netanyahu) is dependent on the successful prosecution of a war that cannot be successfully prosecuted, although Russia probably doesn't want to make that comparison.

The parallels start to break down there. For one thing, Ukraine is not under the control of an equally awful force (for the parallel to apply, they'd basically have to be run entirely by the Azov Battalion.) Israel is also, for all its faults, not nearly as far down the fascism pipeline as Russia is, and the populace still has some ability to resist and protest - the entire staff of Haartez would be in jail if they were Russian - but on the other hand, they have far more authority and power over the region they're attacking than Russia does.
Except for the extremely obvious part where, unlike Ukraine, Gaza's initiation of the latest stage of the conflict was marked by the indiscriminate targeting of Israeli civilians, the mass taking of hostages, and the mass rape, torture and executions of civilians, combined with a periodic pattern of randomly lobbing rockets at Israeli population centers. And where unlike Ukraine the explicit ideological goal of Hamas is the extermination of Israelis from Israel.

These are not small things!

Moderator Text:​

By saying "Gaza's initiation of the latest stage of the conflict", you are equating all Palestinians with Hamas, something we very explicitly told people not to do. Also, Monochrome Tide, your posts in the Israeli threads have generated more reports than pretty much all of the other posters combined. So, we are banning you for a week, as well as from this thread and any future iterations. Additional sanctions may be forthcoming once we discuss it Backstage.

Silly user, victimizers can't be victims!
 
Last edited:
Back