- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
He's skinny but not fit. He has a somatoform midway between Sméagol and Gollum.I agree with your post, but my main point is that he’s just fucking skinny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's skinny but not fit. He has a somatoform midway between Sméagol and Gollum.I agree with your post, but my main point is that he’s just fucking skinny.
MATI is still very much on Rumble. Null simultaneously streams to it and like three other platforms. The Friday show is on there.
Yep.It's dumber than that. Montegraph first asked for a retraction. And as shown with a prior incident with Null, Montegraph doesn't want to sue people. Rakieta in his swiss cheese brain pulled a mix of wigger and kike. Thinking that it would be bitch made to back down so to show he ain't scared of no melon fucking pedophile he didn't retract shit. While also seeing dollar signs imagining it will be like the Maddox lawsuit where he can milk it and make money from it.
Ty had his fair share too. It happens. Nick should know that. He actually did call out Ty at one point. Only like once though. Probably out of sheer frustration with how shit was going.It gets better. In the Weeb Wars arc and other legal cases, Nick and others mocked the opposition for typographical errors.
In hindsight this rant is painfully ironic, the vitriolic hubris is palpable.More wigger though, I would say.
@AnOminous had a good and funny point about the Jew theory: Nick is too incompetent as a lawyer to be a proper Jew. A proper Jew probably wouldn't have self-owned like Rekieta did.
July just straight up won, IMO. He got to keep doing what he wanted to do and all it took was having his lawyers hammer out an agreement to not do shit he wasn't going to do anyway. That's just a cost of doing business when you're actually big. However good or bad in general they are, they were good enough to win the case in like 2 months without going to court. On a strictly results based analysis they blew Ty out of the water.That whole ISOM vs. ISOM thing ended in a mouse fart. Given that, I would think July's lawyers did just fine. Way better than Ty anyways.
Nick's bad conduct around the lawsuit is basically the kind of stuff you'd put in a professional development book for other lawyers as "stuff to tell your client to not do" or "reasons you should avoid trial if any kind of uncapped damages are on the table". I think in the back of his mind he has to know that the only way out is procedural victory or settlement. This is very down in the weeds, but if nick is found liable I think he could potentially be on the hook for unlimited punitive damages given the unhinges bullshit he's said about Monty.It's dumber than that. Montegraph first asked for a retraction. And as shown with a prior incident with Null, Montegraph doesn't want to sue people. Rakieta in his swiss cheese brain pulled a mix of wigger and kike. Thinking that it would be bitch made to back down so to show he ain't scared of no melon fucking pedophile he didn't retract shit. While also seeing dollar signs imagining it will be like the Maddox lawsuit where he can milk it and make money from it.
Attacking typographical errors in a pleading that don't effect it's readability or clarity in a major way is low rent bullshit, IMO.It gets better. In the Weeb Wars arc and other legal cases, Nick and others mocked the opposition for typographical errors. It was shameless PR ans SM signaling that failed to impact the outcome there either, so he has a pattern of doing this for failed cases.
I am not suggesting this is causative, but merely an interesting and humourous pattern that has repeated.
July just straight up won, IMO. He got to keep doing what he wanted to do and all it took was having his lawyers hammer out an agreement to not do shit he wasn't going to do anyway. That's just a cost of doing business when you're actually big. However good or bad in general they are, they were good enough to win the case in like 2 months without going to court. On a strictly results based analysis they blew Ty out of the water.
I still think Ty's professional malpractice insurance ended up making a big payment to Vic, and either they payed the Korean appeal guy, or Ty did out of pocket to try an save the case. The whole appeal had a fell of Ty's insurance saying "we'll cover it, because you fucked up, but so did the judge and it may be savable - so appeal it and we'll pay out if you loose", That's absolutely a way those carriers handle stuff sometime. Vic knowing that he is going to be taken care of would be the only reason for him to stay on sides like that.
I'm certain Nick would complain if he were DoublePegged by Our Wife and her clone as neither would be giving him the Real BBC he craves.between Sméagol and Gollum.
It would be one thing if Nick used the typos for actual comedic bits. For example, lets say one of Greer's ProSe docs in his case against Null was riddled with typos. Nick could read it in a funny voice and attempt to speak the typos aloud and it could be funny. But instead, he's so butthurt about being non-practicing that he chimed in on Dax's tweet to make it seem like July's practicing lawyers' typo was the end of the world and highly embarassing. At least July's lawyers aren't sperging am0lestinground on Xitter being unfunny as fuck.Attacking typographical errors in a pleading that don't effect it's readability or clarity in a major way is low rent bullshit, IMO.
- Nick was confirmed at St. Paul's cathedral,, but he does not think his children would sit through a Mass.
Nor will we ever know if Vivek likes to have a sugar daddy. Nick knows when to ask the hard hitting questions.Now we will never know if Vivek Ramaswamy prefers balls or no balls on his futa.
One-half US pint, or 240ml.
Seriously, it has a fixed value. They are are not talking about some random cup.
Far be it from anyone to suggest that the superchats Nick got during the Depp and Rittenhouse trials had any relation to legal topics. Au contraire, people were just thrilled that the trials gave the famous comedian Nick Rekieta an excuse to hang out online!
I think that Polish guy is drunkIn hindsight this rant is painfully ironic, the vitriolic hubris is palpable.
View attachment 5654146
Short answer, yes.Quick question: are the Locals post-streams a requirement with his rumble contract? I thought they were just something he did randomly, but I remember someone or Nick himself saying they were part of it. Am I wrong? That doesn't seem to make any sense if it is the case. Can someone fill me in?
But, not allowing their son to act like a spoiled degenerate retard his entire life is what ruined Nick. He isn't going to make that mistake with his kids. He'll spend $10,000 a month on that snack drawer if it means his kids can eat doritos and those bougie cashew butter cups for every meal because they feel like it.Is it really that long ago, that if your parents said you’d go to church, you’d fucking go, no matter if you felt like it or not?
It's worth noting the obvious for posterity: Rumble and Locals are run by the same entity, so anything would be one contract. However, you don't need a special contract to get on Locals, it's like right-leaning patreon, and Nick was on it (and very active on it) before his Rumble deal.Short answer, yes.
My understanding is that he has (had?) a contract with Locals but it seems to be tied to Rumble. I have no idea if the Locals was/will be renewed, haven’t seen much discussion on it
Here’s a short of him discussing the Locals contract, if that helps
Yes. He has represented having two separate contracts between Locals and Rumble though.It's worth noting the obvious for posterity: Rumble and Locals are run by the same entity, so anything would be one contract. However, you don't need a special contract to get on Locals, it's like right-leaning patreon, and Nick was on it (and very active on it) before his Rumble deal.