@Android Raptor Hate Thread

Why? What this tells me is that Android Raptor's greatest sin is simply having opinions other people disagree with. That's hardly disruptive.
She has received bans for being disruptive, as well as being scolded for constantly doing it and derailing threads. You're objectively wrong.

Neither is android 18
Um ackshually, they don't use the term android in the original Japanese, they are referred to as artificial humans.

I wouldn't really consider a 12 year old as having reproductive capabilities.
Those pregnant babysitters and teachers would suggest otherwise.

Children can get pregnant, doesn't mean they can go thru the whole process safely since their bodies are still underdeveloped.
I didn't claim otherwise.

Contrary to popular belief, menarche is not the end of female bodily development. Unfortunately many creepy weirdoes want to act like it is for reasons I'm sure totally have nothing to do with how much they want to diddle little girls.
Contrary to your belief, not everybody thinks of diddling kids constantly like you do. Most people only think of it when they see a news article about it or see a homosexual.

Where do you think 11 y/o me got the Android part of my handle
Based, the one thing we have in common.

Dragon ball is garbage.
This is the worst thing you've ever said.

What kind of porn do you want me to post of the Androids?
Android 19 and 15, because it probably doesn't exist.
 
She has received bans for being disruptive, as well as being scolded for constantly doing it and derailing threads. You're objectively wrong.
Okay? Still don't see a pink triangle. That is an objectively correct observation.

What I do see is people constantly writing Android raptor threads in particular. If people didn't want her being disruptive or derailing threads, what's the deal with constantly begging for her attention? And, yes, I'm aware she says a lot of batshit things. But then again a lot of people say batshit things on KF for attention. In her case, it seems to be extremely effective.

Contrary to your belief, not everybody thinks of diddling kids constantly like you do.
I'm curious, when you write "diddling kids" are you not thinking about that as you write the words? Do you turn your brain off temporarily so you can say the word without thinking about what the word means? With how often pedophilia is talked about in all corners of the internet, I'm surprised anyone have the audacity to say it's not something they think about as they refer to it.
 
Okay? Still don't see a pink triangle.
You realize it isn't a mark bestowed by God, correct? They essentially hand it out on a whim, so not everyone who needs one has one, and not everyone who has one deserves it.

What I do see is people constantly writing Android raptor threads in particular. If people didn't want her being disruptive or derailing threads, what's the deal with constantly begging for her attention? And, yes, I'm aware she says a lot of batshit things. But then again a lot of people say batshit things on KF for attention. In her case, it seems to be extremely effective.
That's a lot of words for "she attention whores effectively", and I don't disagree. That should be criteria for pink triangles too, but apparently isn't.

I'm curious, when you write "diddling kids" are you not thinking about that as you write the words? Do you turn your brain off temporarily so you can say the word without thinking about what the word means?
I'm not sure what you're suggesting here, that you imagine the actions or something? Do you not have the capacity to not envision unpleasant things...? Unless the actions are specifically detailed in an article, which they're mercifully usually not (often the gender of the victim isn't even clear), you'd need to actively use your imagination to envision what "diddling" encompasses specifically.

It's a strange point of discussion for you to focus on, but I guess it is an interesting subject, I can't think of any other actions where something specific doesn't come to mind. I never analyzed how my brain works in this regard, but even if you generically say you killed somebody I'll envision a shooting or stabbing practically unconsciously regardless of how they may have actually been killed, but if you say you diddled a kid then the mental image of an adult and child do come to mind, but I guess I have subconscious mental breaks at that point. Do you not?
 
not everyone who has one deserves it
Says you.

Do you not have the capacity to not envision unpleasant things...?
No. You would have to be a robot not to envision something repulsive if you're talking about something repulsive. In fact, that's why how you know it is repulsive. But the way you came across is like, "You mentioned diddling, therefore you constantly think about diddling." It doesn't strike me as an honest way of addressing it.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: PistachiosOnMyDesk
Ignore @Cheeseknife, he is a retard who believes viruses are not real.
The Thunderdome really is the place where even the most retarded conspiracy theories can fester.

I'm still waiting for some tradtards to cut to the chase and bring back vidya causing schools shootings. Some are already trying to bring back the Satanic Panic, might as well have a full reboot of all the retarded 90s 700 Club moral panics.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu
Ignore @Cheeseknife, he is a retard who believes viruses are not real.
He strikes me as a monumentally retarded authority-worshiping faggot. "Oh person A has a pink triangle, person B does not, therefore person A is in the wrong." If pink triangles are simply handed out by forum staff (are they? I don't know), it's nothing more than a mark that one or more mods don't like you. Literally meaningless except to people who think that authority = right. The comedy is that the pink triangle's subtext says "disruptive guest," and Android constantly disrupts threads. The fact that she doesn't have one is actually great vindication for everything I've been saying.
She has received bans for being disruptive, as well as being scolded for constantly doing it and derailing threads. You're objectively wrong.
Man, is that true? Why didn't Null just say that instead of rage-sperging at me for multiple pages of this thread? It would have been a way more effective shutdown of what I was saying. Instead he just came across as a frothing-at-the-mouth prick. Fucking baffling.
 
Back