Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 56 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
(Note; I only half believe that Ralph asked Balldoman about cooming on Harry Morris's gravestone, but I would believe if asked, Balldoman would give that dumb of an answer. The other, equal probabilities are 1. Ralph lied about it and 2. Ralph and Force Ghost Andrew Tate asked Balldoman about cooming in a Xannie Berry hallucination.)
Ralph was just kiddin. It’s one of the funniest jokes he’s said all year, maybe in the last decade
 
Why does nick keep touching his face? Is he just sitting in his chair arms crossed?
Screenshot 2024-01-23 203845.png
 
Nick did a hot tub stream after his show last night:

- Nick opened talking about his woes with his hot tub water levels being low (caused by his forgetfulness),

- Chat had to remind him to make the stream supporter-only.

- He might set up a karaoke session at a meet-up. Nick went on about 'the spirit of karaoke' for a while. It is supposed to be bad, but you are supposed to have fun and no one cares if you are bad if you are fun.

- They use his equipment at home and like to do karaoke with his microphone setup. He will try to convince her to do a karaoke night hang-out at a Vegas show.

- He talked about his tattoo artist and having to meet back up with them at a convention out-of-state, go to them, fly him back, or wait until July when he is back. His artist did the shoulder area really quickly--'Like 3 minutes' but the rest took a longer time.

- Tattoos are an interesting experience and slightly nerve-wracking. Unless you get a pre-made stencil, you do not know what it will look like. Some will free-hand it or do sharpie stencils. His wife goes to a guy who only does hip, leg, thigh, and side of torso that does it all free-hand.

- Nick's suggestion to people who want tattoos is that you should 'just do it, then it is whatever' or you could 'be very selective'. 'Some people get inked all over and really like it'. 'You don't really notice you have tattoos most of the time'. Nick forgets he has them most of the time, and 'other people notice them way more than you'.

- He has 3 more to get for sure, but he is open to more. 2 of the 3 are about her and him.

- He saw a girl with cross swords on her cheek below her eye and it looked amazing. He could never do something like that. He doesn't care what people do to their bodies, though.

- He made a joke that he flashes people to show off his tattoos.

- Someone said they needed to get more work on their tattoo, and he asked 'How many naked women are going to be on it.'

- Nick said he likes seeing chat move, but they he 'sees it is Still-[Born] and is like: "Ohhhhh..."'.

- Nick is going to go on with Camelot and bring him on. He has awesome stories about joining NASCAR.

- Nick said 800 viewers for a trial is 'shitty'. He can never predict which trials will be interesting. He does not think the one about the boyfriend in suitcase will be sad and not popular.

- He thinks Baldwin will plead down to a misdemeanor.

- He had a tangent about how and why OF girls are popular, and how he wishes he could make money from it.

- He has to get guest on this week. He has a BUNCH of people and is not taking suggestions; he just has to pick one to invite. He will try to get people on this week.
 
Let us return to see what LOCALS thinks of The Farms and Josh's situation:

Not terribly interesting, but I took a look.

A new excuse has dropped:

RekietaLaw​
Wheee. Working on being on time...gonna fail...Makin lady r ramen

Dave Portnoy owns part of Rumble:

Charlie101101​
@RekietaLaw did you see that Dave Portnoy owns a portion of rumble now


A foreign lawyer chimes in:

AussieOverLawd​
Still not a great look for Josh if it comes out during discrovery that CP was on the site


This guy linked 5-7 tweets directly to Nick 3-5 times each since he could not find them:

TimcastIRL​
@RekietaLaw https://nitter.net/EpikLLC/status/1749461213493481968 this is one of the tweets dick replied to with Epik looking apologetic and saying it was a rogue employee


LOCALS on Kiwi Farms' Situation:

--Still--Life--​
KIWI FARMS are stupid little fed fagot wanna-bees

DarkHumar87​
Kiddypedofarms

--Still--Life--​
Fuck Kiwi Farms, I'll stab those little faggots in the name of God.
DarkHumar87​
They should just change the name

Jochoy​
Not everyone will like you but not everyone is a retarded kiwi farms faggot

--Still--Life--​
STAB some KIWI FAGGTOT in the face FR

jcornman24​
In order to be a good domain registrar you have to support free speech imo

BenSC​
I think Josh will have trouble proving any actual damages

KevinSomewhere​
The reputation of KiwiFarms has been damaged beyond rehahahahahahahaha

BenSC​
Kinda like Monty

sdsmosher​
@RekietaLaw Section 230 claim by Josh since he in good faith tried to remove the alleged content?

DarkHumar87​
If anything he would be liable though lol 😂 cause the judge is going to say well you did

DarkHumar87​
Then he’ll have to pay them for their court fees lol

SleepingPsycho​
Didn’t he say that he banned porn completely on KF?
DarkHumar87​
It’s not easy to prove a loss having happened when you yourself could be held accountable for having insufficient child pornography saftey measures lol 😂 I think it would be funny
SleepingPsycho​
I feel like I remember that from the last time Josh was on Nick’s channel—so, like, a year ago

Buzzion​
Epik is going to be able to attempt the Darrel Brooks defense. "Is the plaintiff here?"

Gurnolla​
"Have you ever met or spoken to kiwi farms?" lol Brooksy's first case in his new legal career.

YaBoyHPLovecraft​
Did I miss whether or not KF had some form of cp on it?

Skull-Leader​
JOSH IS A PEDO
Skull-Leader​
!!



The Rekeita Theory of Defamation (according to LOCALS)

Demons_Wrath​
I remember nick said once "it's not defamatory to call him a murderer, because that's not a factual statement it's opinion"

Demons_Wrath​
anyone can believe rittenhouse is a murderer and say it, it'll be considered good faith provided they actually believe it.

Demons_Wrath​
But it's defamatory to say "he brought an ar15 across state lines" because it's a factual statement, which isn't true

DependasaurusRex​
Yes, a person can. But not an organization/media
 
Demons_Wrath​
I remember nick said once "it's not defamatory to call him a murderer, because that's not a factual statement it's opinion"

Demons_Wrath​
anyone can believe rittenhouse is a murderer and say it, it'll be considered good faith provided they actually believe it.

Demons_Wrath​
But it's defamatory to say "he brought an ar15 across state lines" because it's a factual statement, which isn't true
Can he be more retarded? Both hypotheticals involve statements of facts that can be defamatory if untrue. What is his logic? That because you're not stating which murder you're referring to, the statement isn't defamatory? Oh so you can just call people paedophiles in general so long as you don't specify a particular crime? What!? If anything the opposite is true, if you don't provide justification for why you're defaming someone, you're more likely to lose a suit!
 
Last edited:
AussieOverLawd​
Still not a great look for Josh if it comes out during discrovery that CP was on the site
Do these fucking idiots think that if csam has EVER been uploaded to a website that that means that you HOST CP. None of them stop and think "if that's the case doesn't twitter, facebook, reddit, and youtube all host CP"
Its like if somebody put a pride flag in your yard and you removed it instantly but now you're part of the fag flag community in perpetuity.
 
Clearly Balldoman's "legal" analysis last night was just a hasty, ill-thought out, emotional response to Sean's smack-down of Balldoman's great legal advice to Ralph regarding cooming.
Isn't there enough Ralph cum in that man's life already? I mean his daughter did bring some home and now they're stuck with it. Matthew and Harry of the gunted blood lines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboute Guilliman
I feel so hesitant to comment on the legality of a business or legal entity getting defamed because I am not lawyer people. But it looks like businesses can sue to retaliate against defamation.
1 2

If I'm missing something then someone please tell me, but I can't imagine a business wouldn't be able to sue for defamation considering all the rights afforded to such entities.

I think Nick's malice is starting to show its face because this is just pigheaded.

Also, regarding Greer, couldn't the argument be made that KF didn't make defamatory comments about Greer since KF is only a platform for other's commentary? And you know not capable of making comments on Greer in the first place.
 
Well that clip of drugged up Nick opining on KF vs. Epik without doing any show prep was good for one thing: Confirming that Nick is pushing himself to do a “professional” show where he talks as if he’s reading from a script.

It’s almost as if he’s afraid another month of his post-Rumble contract life is about to pass and TPTB don’t seem to even know he’s alive.
 
Do these fucking idiots think that if csam has EVER been uploaded to a website that that means that you HOST CP. None of them stop and think "if that's the case doesn't twitter, facebook, reddit, and youtube all host CP"

If you've ever responded to Vito or Drexel on Twitter or in the YouTube comment section, that's pretty clear evidence that you're a co-conspirator in a CP distribution ring, providing the ring-leaders with coded legal advice on the best ways to skirt the legal consequences of grooming and distributing CP.

In the case of Ralph, he's come right out and said as much. "Rekieta told me I could do X with impunity." Masturbating on-line to 13 year old Soph is perfectly legal. She had ALL of her clothes on. I'm free and clear.

I dunno though. If they find out in discovery that Aussie Overlawd has been stealing from his client's accounts, things could get really sticky for him.
 
I feel so hesitant to comment on the legality of a business or legal entity getting defamed because I am not lawyer people. But it looks like businesses can sue to retaliate against defamation.
1 2

If I'm missing something then someone please tell me, but I can't imagine a business wouldn't be able to sue for defamation considering all the rights afforded to such entities.

I think Nick's malice is starting to show its face because this is just pigheaded.
Saying that Rekieta Law LLC distributes balldos to small children or Walmart Best Value pepperoni is made from ground-up black children locally sourced from a fat white man in Milwaukee would be defamatory. Consider that Dominion, the sketchy company making the sketchy voting machines, won an enormous lawsuit for defamation since claiming their voting machines enables fraud is defamation unless you can prove it to the court (the court ignores the multitude of evidence that this is the case).
 
The fact that Rumble isn't picking up the phone is really starting to sink in and he's clawing at this in an attempt to get his titanic aiming away from the icebergs even as multiple sections are already flooding.

He thinks this going to let him finally get to dunk on kiwifarms effectively in a way with plausible deniability of still wanting to be friends with Josh.
 
He thinks this going to let him finally get to dunk on kiwifarms effectively in a way with plausible deniability of still wanting to be friends with Josh.
It's amazing how many people don't get the wisdom of Jim in pointing out there's literally no such thing as Internet "friends." People don't owe you just because you agreed with something they said or the other way around a year ago. They also aren't your "enemies" if shit changes and you no longer have some autistic, gay politics in common. They aren't "snaking" if they laugh when you publicly shit your pants.

That may be the most actually annoying thing about Balldo currently, his womanish attempts to pretend he's on good terms with people he's obviously full of seething hatred about. Just grow a pair and say fuck you, Null, you faggot. Even Ethan Ralph has the cojones to do that, despite being so spineless he'll be sucking up to you the instant he senses an advantage in that.

This fence-sitting Boogie-tier shit is as weak and gay as it comes.
 
Back