Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Your Starter for 10]

Going to continue to decorate my new apartment here at Delphi.

 

[RodgerDodger]

He's going to attempt to reply to Nulls answer in his other filings. He always does.

 

[Jotch]

He's going to attempt to reply to Nulls answer in his other filings. He always does.

You can always refute the claims in unrelated extra paragraphs in every filing from now to the end of time. Even in other people's cases.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

He's going to attempt to reply to Nulls answer in his other filings. He always does.

Can't he get in trouble for that?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Can't he get in trouble for that?

Technically? Sure. Will he? Not so sure about that

 

[Mind Goblins]

It strikes me as the sort of thing that, at most, Null would respond to with something along the lines of "We request that paragraphs x through y be stricken as irrelevant." Based solely on how I've seen judges behave in other Greer suits and most of Acerthorn's, the judge might say "Plaintiff should refrain from using motion replies to reply to other case files," but unless things get stupidly out of hand they won't throw the book at him or anything.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Can't he get in trouble for that?

Whether or not he does, we get content.

 

[waffle]

I think in his other federal cases Russ has had the habit of asserting his right to district judge review of every decision he dislikes. I'm interested to see if he does that about filing a reply.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Technically? Sure. Will he? Not so sure about that

I am well aware of the lolcow exemption rule for the courts where all lolcows can just avoid the consequences of their actions. Just wanted to make sure a non retard deciding to do that would be punished.

Whether or not he does, we get content.

Anytime Russell posts is content

 

[Kosher Salt]

I think in his other federal cases Russ has had the habit of asserting his right to district judge review of every decision he dislikes. I'm interested to see if he does that about filing a reply.

Are you thinking of Melinda Scott? I do recall her having issues with "not consenting to a magistrate justice" for the orders in her failed lawsuit against KF.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I do recall her having issues with "not consenting to a magistrate justice" for the orders in her failed lawsuit against KF.

I must reiterate that she was right about that in the end even if I disagree with it.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-14925249

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-14926941

I am well aware of the lolcow exemption rule for the courts where all lolcows can just avoid the consequences of their actions. Just wanted to make sure a non retard deciding to do that would be punished.

It all depends on how much that annoys the court, and how much the other party is pressing the issue.

 

[mindlessobserver]

There ya go Russel! You get 5 weeks to finish all your assignments! Yes, they will be graded. It is not recommended you start the night prior.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

It is not recommended you start the night prior.

The day it's due, he's going to file a request for an extension, and he'll make sure to file it just at the end of the day.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

There ya go Russel! You get 5 weeks to finish all your assignments! Yes, they will be graded. It is not recommended you start the night prior.

But he won't print anything out until an HOUR before court is in session

 

[mindlessobserver]

The day it's due, he's going to file a request for an extension, and he'll make sure to file it just at the end of the day.

Its not that hard to finish all the Judges assignments, even pro se. He needs to respond to 4 motions in 5 weeks. So, just dedicate a weekend for each motion and spend it in a law library with free access to Westlaw and PACER. Judge isn't looking for a 70 page dissertation. Just a few pages on each motion explaining Greer's opposition to Nulls motion, and the relevant case law behind his reasoning. Greer was a Paralegal if memory serves, so for sure he's heard of IRAC. I'm sure the judge won't care if his filing looks like it got run through legal zooms generative AI. Just so long as its coherent.

But I think that last part is the issue when it comes to Greer.

 

[AnOminous]

Greer was a Paralegal if memory serves, so for sure he's heard of IRAC.

At best he's vaguely aware it's in Africa or South America or something and we had a war against it at some point.

 

[Dong-Liquor]

Greer was a Paralegal if memory serves...

Russell has the greatest paralegal mind in the history of paralegality, paralegalism, and paralegalosophy. His downfall is that his legal writings are on a completely different level of brilliance that confuses everyone who is not him. He uses legal theories that no other paralegal or lawyer could ever think of. For his bosses, legal opponents, and judges handling his cases, it is a toss-up as to which is harder for them to comprehend, the written word of Russell Greer or the spoken word of Russell Greer.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What’s funny to me is that Greer’s response is due February 29th, one day after Nick will be attempting to convince appellate judges that they should protect his right to accuse people of being pedophiles who like sucking off children. So, we’ll get double lolcow special essentially.

 

[R00T]

Russ there's this new law firm on the block I've been hearing about called Chat, G, P, and T associates. I'm sure they'll help you with all those darn dirty filings.

 

[Poop Shoot]

Just a few pages on each motion explaining Greer's opposition to Nulls motion, and the relevant case law behind his reasoning

I’m really, really looking forward to these. He always wants to just explain, and now he gets the chance. I deeply enjoy reading his version of things. I hope he gets as creative as in his Taylor swift book and it’ll be on the record forever.