𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

So.... is some good kiwi samaritan going to post the uncensored ai lewds in question? For my friend, swim.
Don't really need to, just generate an infinite amount of them yourself trivially. Install A1111, find a Taylor Swift LORA (there are likely quite a few), find a porn-focused model (hardblend or whatever), and enter almost any old prompt to generate an infinite volume of porno Tay-Tays.
 
... I've come across this schizo Xitter account that accuses all famous people of being trannies and he's convinced that Taylor Swift is a man. Not sure if this guy is trolling or he actually believes that all of these people are trannies.
ps://twitter.com/MAVERIC68078049/status/1750561907260715164?t=zDO8QtXhRL_YC8vKQnf8ZQ&s=19[/URL]
That might be part of a group called the Transvestigation, who believe that everyone even remotely famous is transgender and part of some satanic/Illuminati conspiracy. Apparently they are (largely) genuine in this belief. Shoe0nHead made a video about it.

 
What I find funny: X is adding new features in a way faster rate then before despite laying of nearly 75% of it's staff. Just look at this

X

I mean, we got a (paywalled) edit button, streaming option, now this Media tab. And what, within 1 year? What were they actually doing before? Tiktoking their great work enviroment? Or were the developers overladen with "block these asshole! Shadowban this pesky right-winger!"?

And at the same time, if numbers are to be believed X is getting more and more visits and users.
 
Don't really need to, just generate an infinite amount of them yourself trivially. Install A1111, find a Taylor Swift LORA (there are likely quite a few), find a porn-focused model (hardblend or whatever), and enter almost any old prompt to generate an infinite volume of porno Tay-Tays.
Then post them from a fake Xitter account seeded with bogus info to lead to some retard you want swarmed by Swiftards. Obviously don't actually do this.
 
Also before you accuse me of MATI Ive seen his whole youtube output, Ive studied him and I dont like him or his ilk.
Dear lord lmao.
His point maybe true but its not coming from a neutral source
There is no such thing as neutrality, we all have interests.
Considering hes an Irish nationalist he could be attacking Varadkar or somebody instead of obsessively tweeting about Jewish pedophiles and Israel
Denied.
You don't get to attempt to shift people's attention from a target that's rather legitimate.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Georgio Cocklord
i agree that on some level it's fucked up to make ai porn of people. but it's also fucked up to make pencil drawing porn of real people, too. doesn't mean it's illegal, or that suing the pencil company makes sense.
Not really no, most people learn anatomy by drawing porn of real people. Hell there was an entire industry in the 80s and 90s dedicated to tracing playboy models. The most famous instance of this, arguably the posterchild of that industry was bettie davis but a lot of artists specialised in lewd/nude pinups of real people. The problem with ai is that it's more realistic and people don't like that it's more realistic cause it feels more non consensual, I'm sure there was a similar moral outrage back in the 80s where people drew porn of celebs and models. I think it will pass after a while once ai becomes more normalised. The only way to shut it down is ignoring it and not feeding the trolls I'm sure.
 
i agree that on some level it's fucked up to make ai porn of people. but it's also fucked up to make pencil drawing porn of real people, too. doesn't mean it's illegal, or that suing the pencil company makes sense.
Except it is illegal. Shadman was sued for drawing CP of a real-life little girl. Now imagine all the Shadmans who are making hyper-realistic CP with AI technologies. We live in a nightmare coomer world.
 
Watch this doxing spree be portrayed as a fight against misogyny. and totally righteous and an example to be followed.
But when we dox sex offender trannies it's an unforgivable sin, and we should be exiled from the whole internet
0 days since leftists proving they have no morals so will never be ethically consistent.
i agree that on some level it's fucked up to make ai porn of people. but it's also fucked up to make pencil drawing porn of real people, too. doesn't mean it's illegal, or that suing the pencil company makes sense.
It's a sort of thing that should be socially discouraged to ever see the light of day and be hidden in a box under your bed, imo.
 
Except it is illegal. Shadman was sued for drawing CP of a real-life little girl. Now imagine all the Shadmans who are making hyper-realistic CP with AI technologies. We live in a nightmare coomer world.
Yeah but that's children. You'd have to fit in ai fake porn of adult women into some other offense, and it's likely such offenses are neither widely prosecuted nor harshly punishable.

Not that I care about brown Canadian coomers getting destroyed by the Internet. Taylor Swift is just an average songwriter whose music all kinda sounds the same to me, but she's a traditionally attractive, white American girl who doesn't sing about degeneracy or get up to societally destructive activities. She doesn't really get involved in politics or divisive nonsense, from what I know about her. Almost every other artist or musician out there is a worse person to idolize, especially for young girls. I will take her side over that of pornsick coomers every single time.
 
Except it is illegal. Shadman was sued for drawing CP of a real-life little girl. Now imagine all the Shadmans who are making hyper-realistic CP with AI technologies. We live in a nightmare coomer world.
cp is already illegal, so that makes sense. i do agree with you about us living in a nightmare coomer world, and i personally think porn in general should be illegal. lenin and marx were right about prostitution and i'm sure they'd have felt the same way about modern pornography in general. i was speaking to the current legality of the material in the country it was created.
 
Except it is illegal. Shadman was sued for drawing CP of a real-life little girl. Now imagine all the Shadmans who are making hyper-realistic CP with AI technologies. We live in a nightmare coomer world.
AI has to be trained first, on actual data. Such as actual porn and lots of pics of Taylor Swift. It can then combine them.
If AI can make hyper-realistic CP, then it's already trained on CP and the dataset itself is already illegal. Just as it'd be illegal to watch/own CP and use it as inspiration for actual drawings.

Though the point about Shadman is fair. How did that lawsuit go? Couldn't he just argue it's not supposed to be her, and just happens to look similair? It'd be bullshit ofcourse but you cannot proof that. If he openly stated it's her, well, that's different then
 
Even if AI Porn gets banned, you still get TayTay in a Nazi uniform in front of a burning synagogue.
Yes, not very good, didn't waste much time on these.
SNEED_9321.jpgSNEED_251.jpg
 
Back