Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

Here we go!
Screenshot 2024-01-27 4.41.55 PM.png
 
I see some saber-rattling in this thread and it needs to be pointed out.
I personally will give shekels when it comes to crowd funding against defamatory statements made by a corporate entity that's related to the Internet infrastructure.
I won't give a cent if there's a lawsuit against some internet sperg that shouts inane ramblings on twitter.
One is worth the effort and sets a worthwhile precedent, the other is frivolous.
Basically, all you niggers that call for a lawsuit need to chill the fuck out and remember that you're on this site to laugh at retards, not do legal battles with them. Money for legal suits is a rather finite source, so let's use it wisely and pick only the battles that are worth fighting.
 
So you're offering to foot the bill, then?

Nah, lol. I’m a poor. Even if money was not a consideration, the juice wouldn’t be worth the squeeze. It would be nice to see the bitch get fat(ter) from having to eat her own words though.

@skunt summed it up best here:

You're 100% correct. I should have phrased it better.
Winning a case against jackie means nothing because 1) she can't pay you 2) she's a nobody who's clearly retarded so a win means nothing and 3) presumably 75k would be needed (again) just to bring a case forward.

Epik is a different matter as their name holds a little weight, plus they're in the industry that's actively harming the farms.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre
Anyone with some psych background understand how someone has a sub 10% rate for being correct on their accusations, assumptions and generic statements, and is still violently confident?

It registers with her that she is probably wrong because she hides evidence when it happens, and when caught out doubles down?

Is this some melding of ODD, abject stupidity, God complex and psychopathy?
 
Anyone with some psych background understand how someone has a sub 10% rate for being correct on their accusations, assumptions and generic statements, and is still violently confident?

It registers with her that she is probably wrong because she hides evidence when it happens, and when caught out doubles down?

Is this some melding of ODD, abject stupidity, God complex and psychopathy?
I diagnose her as completely banana buttfuck mental. I'm currently trying to get it added to the DSM-VI. BBFM.
 

this is literal schizophrenia, is she going to accuse null of killing JFK too?
Again, she has absolutely nothing going for her and is desperate to gain any amount of attention or victimhood so that she can try to grift off of it for money. Best to ignore this zero.
 
Back