Business The unrelenting ‘Great Betrayal’ has killed the dream of the cushy tech job - The rise of generative AI and new layoffs at Amazon, Google, and other companies have reinforced a sense of betrayal among employeees and an increasing turn to freelance work, a new survey finds.

broketop.png
[Source image: Jorg Greuel/Getty Images]

Two weeks ago, Brittany Pietsch, an account executive at Cloudflare, sat down for a suspicious 10-minute call with HR. Secretly, she set up her phone to record whatever happened next.

Two anonymous HR people she had never met before unceremoniously told her she was being let go for performance-related issues. But Pietsch was ready. She had already caught wind that other people on her team were getting a similar explanation.
“I’m gonna stop you right there,” Pietsch said, before defending her performance, reminding them that she had only been on the team for three months—a period that included the holiday break—and suggesting that the real reason she was being fired had more to do with Cloudshare “overhiring.”
When she posted the story to her thousands of TikTok followers, the video went viral, tapping into the frustration that many tech workers feel right now. There’s an enduring sense of betrayal, even if the pace of the layoffs has waned.

Though the scale of cuts has lessened from a year ago this time, there still has been plenty so far this year: Twitch, Amazon, Duolingo, Discord, and Google are among the companies that have reduced headcount. On top of that, CEOs are talking incessantly about replacing people with AI. A blog post from the head of the IMF predicted that 60% of jobs in advanced economies would be impacted by the rise of AI. Some big tech companies are already pointing to a renewed focus on AI as a justification for layoffs.
Propelled by these macro forces, there’s an ongoing shift in sentiment—a change in how workers think about their jobs. Our collective trust in full-time employment is faltering. If the security of a big tech job is no longer the aspirational goal, what will replace it?
Last year, we here at A.Team surveyed 500 knowledge workers to find out how the massive wave of big tech layoffs impacted employees’ feelings about their jobs. The results were dramatic: respondents resoundingly wanted more flexibility and autonomy and did not feel secure committing to one employer. Our findings sparked a viral workforce trend, The Great Betrayal.

As the layoffs tapered off slightly over the course of 2023—and AI emerged—we wanted to return to knowledge workers to see if their sentiments had changed.

This time we surveyed 1,000 knowledge workers and right away it was obvious that the trend was entrenched. The results from this year were almost exactly the same as last year—within the margin of error. The appeal of freelance work for knowledge workers and the push away from full-time work are both enduring.

Key Findings​

In A.Team’s survey of 1,000 knowledge workers in the US:
  • ▪86% said they would like to have more control and flexibility over their work schedule than traditional full-time employment can offer.
  • ▪73% said that the waves of layoffs over the past two years have made freelance work more attractive than before.
  • ▪61% said that the waves of layoffs have made them feel less secure committing to one employer.
  • ▪64% said that the waves of layoffs have made them lose trust in the stability and security of full-time employment.‍
  • ▪67% of knowledge workers said the emergence of generative AI technologies has made freelance work more attractive.
These results reflect a major ongoing shift in how highly skilled workers feel about full-time employment. Last year, we saw signs of The Great Betrayal: a stinging sense that the promise of the reliability of full time employment had been shattered. This year, we’ve discovered that this wasn’t just a one-time deal.

Some workers feel so betrayed that they’re juggling two full-time jobs without alerting either company. As one such worker explained it: “My parents told me, ‘Don’t switch companies, grow in one company, be loyal to one company, and they’ll be loyal to you.’ That may have been true in their days, but it definitely isn’t today anymore.” Loyalty, it seems, is at an all-time low on both sides.

Our findings suggest that freelancing is emerging as a safe haven for tech workers. After two years of turmoil in tech, people are fundamentally changing the way they work. In our data, we’ve discovered two major trends:

Knowledge workers still feel betrayed by the empty promises of traditional full-time employment​

“The veil of invincibility has been pierced.”

That’s a quote from Jeff Spector—the CEO of Karat, a tech-interviewing platform—explaining to CNBC how Silicon Valley may have lost its monopoly on workers after another round of big tech job cuts.

This frustration isn’t new. We knew from our survey last year that many workers felt betrayed following the deluge of callous layoffs, as the illusion of stability in full-time employment was broken. In asking many of the same questions again, we found that these sentiments haven’t changed. Even as layoffs have slowed over the past year, that sense of betrayal remains.

The vast majority of respondents (86%) said they would like to have more control and flexibility over their work schedule than traditional full-time employment can offer. Some 60% of knowledge workers said that the waves of layoffs over the past two years have motivated them to rethink the focus of their career. And 73% said that the recent waves of layoffs have made freelance work more attractive than before.

The fact that this year’s responses are remarkably similar to last year’s suggests that this trend isn’t just a temporary reaction to the current job market but a fundamental rethinking of career paths and work-life balance.

Freelance work is even more attractive in the age of AI​

The proliferation of generative AI only seems to expedite this trend. Of the knowledge workers we asked, 67% said the emergence of generative AI makes freelance work even more attractive. And of people who are already freelancing, that number jumps to 74%. We can speculate on why this might be the case—one possible reason is that AI skills are more lucrative as a freelancer than as a full-time employee because of the broader skills shortage.

Three out of four independent workers say there’s been an uptick in freelance opportunities in their industry over the past year. The freelance economy, already valued at $5.4 trillion, is expected to grow as companies increasingly hire independent workers. And, as an upcoming study of AI productivity gains will show, builders in the A.Team network have increased their income since the advent of generative AI by an average of 12%.

At the same time, less than half of laid-off workers are looking for another full-time role within the same field; 26% are pivoting to an entirely new field, while the other 25% have decided to forgo full-time employment altogether by freelancing or starting their own business.

These findings underscore a paradigm shift in the white-collar world—a growing number of workers not just seeking but thriving in the freelance market. As traditional employment models are forced to become less rigid, the rise of a dynamic, AI-enhanced freelance economy reflects a future where work is more personalized, adaptable, and aligned with the evolving aspirations of the modern worker.

Article Link

Archive
 
Honestly for those in the tech industry they need to look at the brighter side of things, the 3rd World is such a nightmare to deal that the end result is US Tech workers didn't get their jobs Outsourced to countries like China, India.

Anecdotal evidence: My friend works IT Manager for a billion dollar corporation, only cryptic hint I can give is that if you've been in a city you've used their product or you've seen it. But anyway they have a big contract with Macau & Hong Kong and part of that deal meant they needed to hire Chinese IT engineers. And it repeats again and again, the Chinese hire sounds great on paper and appears qualified and then they turn totally retarded. They will tell my friend "I DO NOT UNDERSTAND" during business meetings, they just act like they hit a wall. They apparently will miss regular meetings and not even have good excuses. It has gotten to the point where he has just done the work for them because firing during crunch time makes my friend look bad. Indian employees on US Visa are are just as lousy in his experience. Only one Indian ended up being great the others just a waste of time. US Education has been criticized for incompetent people pass but China and India are significantly worse. From his perspective he doesn't think he would have done his major if he were a college student today. But it's not like AI will just replace the take the jobs outright. In the same way you still need an engineer or architect to overview schematics there will always need to be people who can understand a system.

Rockstar Games is what we agree on is the sterling example of follies of trying to maximize profits. The GTAVI data leak is just downright hilarious for such a company to not have secured servers. And the GTA3 Trilogy Remaster is what happens when you entrust Outsourced Indians to do a job. If you're in the tech industry find corporations which CANNOT AFFORD TO FUCK UP.

Anyway this article ending with the claim that people want to be "Freelance" sounds like total bullshit. That sounds like the dream of a ruthless CEO. If they're freelance then they don't even have to be fired they never were permanent in the first place.
 
As a professional computer toucher(r)(tm) I've learned the way to keep my job is to be smarter than everyone else. Sadly that makes work boring so I've become a consultant, not freelance though, then I'd have to spend half my time doing sales and paperwork. I have an employer who pimps me out and gives me a steady paycheck. Money isn't as good but there's less BS. And they're big enough that I do get to work on interesting problems and not stuff that ChatGPT or Pajeets can solve... for now. And often faster than the vendors who are supposedly the "experts" on these products.

In hindsight maybe I should have been an electrician though.
 
Any white liberal losing their job should celebrate the fact that more company resources are freed up to hire BIPOCs and bring equity to the world.

I'm not sure that any job will be safe from automation of some sort.

I can't think of a single job today that does not rely on automation of some sort.
 
Weren't you career military?
And the military is extremely good at making sure every enlisted spends every second of their eighteen hour days, seven days a week, doing something for 'em, even if its watering the rock garden to grow a new pair of stones for private dumbass over here.

You can argue whether it was productive, but try pulling a "Day in the Life Of" coffee and chill day in the military and see how long it takes for them to break out the knife hands.
 
Lol workers aren't preferring freelance work, that's all that is offered in the current market.
Turns out conducting layoffs are bad PR and all the shitholes these corpos are headquartered in have onerous employment laws, so it's much easier to just make everyone a W2 "independent" contractor so you can quietly let the contract run out every six/twelve months instead of going through the process of getting rid of salaried employees.

The gig economy has always been soulless bastards at the top of the chain doing everything they can to get out of having any obligation to, or long-term relationship with, their employees.
 
I would really, REALLY like to see the breakdown of what each survey participant's title was when they were employed. I suspect not so many Software Engineers or Database Administrators as there are 'Intermediate Micromanager of Break Room's Microwave System Regulator' or 'Designated DEI-Focused Hallway Thermostat Programmer'
 
It turns out a lot of the people fired are QA/testers, and it's sad to see as a consumer. I've always liked QA because "lol free beta access" for years but knew it was a dogshit job/pay. I wrote at least 40 bug tickets for WoW's Battle for Azeroth beta, and was not invited back/given access to future expansions. Won't pay employees, won't give the nerds access willing to do it for free, is it any wonder Blizzard games feel like untested trash and launch with dogshit features? It's like this in most tech companies though, my non-game company has testing departments struggling to prove they're needed and executives just don't seem to get it. It's almost like there's an industry-wide agreement to just launch trash and apologize later/patch it if it's bad enough, and that's okay with everyone apparently.

I don't get it, but I'm also not paid to. I got mine, get fucked freshly-fired.
 
I would really, REALLY like to see the breakdown of what each survey participant's title was when they were employed. I suspect not so many Software Engineers or Database Administrators as there are 'Intermediate Micromanager of Break Room's Microwave System Regulator' or 'Designated DEI-Focused Hallway Thermostat Programmer'
Even this article starts out with an interview with an account executive, which is HR for "writes 5 emails a day for a living"
 
I take my family to the same church as the owner of my companies family and my kids play boardgames with his kids, I automated and outsourced 80% of my job and just approve invoices instead of doing any IT anymore.

I don't follow up on newest trends and I don't know half if the systems these kids today come in with but I'll never lose my job.
 
"Great betrayal"...

You were all working for massive faceless multinational megacorps, what did you expect? that they would care about you the little cog in the machine? about your stupid baizou "hopes and dreams"? that once the metaphorical clock went digital they wouldn't replace all the little useless cogs like you with a couple transistors that do the same job but better and cheaper?

You all worked building this, for years defended this and now you're pikachufaced because for once you're on the receiving end of what you've done.
 
Last edited:
If you have a general idea of what you are doing (code-wise) you can use ChatGPT to enhance your code, add functions. I think "learn to code" will age terribly.
It's already aged terribly. Most of the code monkeys these days are just parroting what they read on Stack Overflow anyway. It's all crap.

The number of times I've been asked to check into performance issues or problems with code these days and found it to be utter crap is too damn high. Well, ok, fine, it's great for me, but bad for my customers who need someone who isn't a retarded monkey to look at their stuff.

"Have you considered NOT having 3 levels of nested loops making this code run the inner code n*n*n times and then giving it more data and wondering why it's slow?"
"Hey, your code is running the system out of disk space, have you considered passing a size limit to that stupid cache function you're using?"
etc. etc.

I'm looking forward to the day when a coder asks for some code for a database query and ChatGPT chooses the example code for an SQL Injection attack instead of the code designed to prevent one.
 
It's too early to blame "AI" for a lot of these job losses. I think these companies wanted to trim the fat and are blaming it on the AI boogeyman that is already in the news daily. Time your cuts with all of the other companies doing cuts, and you won't be pilloried for it.
We haven’t truly seen the impact of AI yet. What this is is low interest rates coming to an end, venture capital firms realising they need to invest in companies that make money, and the tech industry massively over hiring with insane wages to stop their hires going to rivals as they were betting on a boom that never came.
 
It's almost like there's an industry-wide agreement to just launch trash and apologize later/patch it if it's bad enough, and that's okay with everyone apparently.
That's basically exactly it. Its not official or anything, but customers have extremely limited recourse when it comes to quality on these things. For new releases, players have at best a handful of hours to realize just how fucked things are, and if they don't figure it out and refund in that time window, they're stuck with it. Preorders generally don't even have that guarantee, they're often not refundable or only partially refundable, giving up a deposit. For continuous services, customers don't even have that recourse - they voted with their wallet however long ago, and they're stuck with whatever shit is peddled to them.

Quality isn't rewarded, and often a game gets more praise for launching garbage and becoming ok, than it gets for launching OK in the first place. As a result, there's generally minimal interest in launching anywhere close to perfect. As long as it works, and works long enough to invalidate most refund requests, everything else is rosy. Either you can't fix it, but you already got paid, or you can fix it and get free PR for doing so.

Even if you decide to wait until the launch state is confirmed good to buy, your still not free of this as they can and do just break things later with patches anyway. It takes years for a product to settle and finally decide if its 'worth it'.

We haven’t truly seen the impact of AI yet. What this is is low interest rates coming to an end, venture capital firms realising they need to invest in companies that make money, and the tech industry massively over hiring with insane wages to stop their hires going to rivals as they were betting on a boom that never came.
For what its worth, this credit crunch has probably killed commercial AI, not secured it. Without bottomless credit, few organizations are willing to shoulder the not at all insignificant cost of shifting serious revenue generating workload over into AI, especially when there are no real success stories for it yet. Its got ok credibility in a few ancillary tasks and providing better interfaces to your organizations knowledge resources, but everything beyond that is dicey at best, and really only works as a collaborative tool with a human. The only way that a business could justify such a hail mary venture would be if the money to do so was practically free, so that they could retain all their talent that does it currently, and do the AI in parallel, and see how it goes. If that speculative AI partnership is now going to cost you millions of dollars a year in interest fees while you do the feasibility study, you're probably gonna say fuck it, let someone else take the first step. And nobody can really afford that first step.

Small, specialized firms may get more aggressive, using open source AI tools to try and leg up into the big leagues, but we're talking sub-50 head orgs, nothing that'd shatter the industry, and nothing the big players would consider indicative of at-scale deployment. They're just too risk adverse, especially in this economic climate.

Really, I do think the major impact of AI over the next five years will be the offshoots of the open source AI space providing a new realm of individual personal assistant style services. We may see the next tech giant start their rise down that path, but more likely it ends up a relative novelty for most and a tool for power users, similar to Miro, or Trello. People love offloading their life responsibilities, and a personal virtual assistant is a good fit for that.
 
Back