Crime Pro-life activists face up to 11 years in prison after conviction over prayer vigil outside abortion clinic - Video footage of the protest shows the group praying and singing Christian hymns in the hallway outside the clinic's doors.

face.png

Six pro-life activists face up to 11 years in prison after a Nashville jury found them guilty on Tuesday of conspiracy and violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act over their peaceful protest outside of an abortion clinic in March 2021.

The charges were brought by President Joe Biden's Department of Justice.

The six defendants are Chet Gallagher, Coleman Boyd, Heather Idoni, Cal Zastrow, Dennis Green, and Paul Vaughn. They are accused in the charging documents of using social media to organize a blockade at the entrance of an abortion clinic in Mount Juliet.

Video footage of the protest shows the group peacefully praying and singing Christian hymns in the hallway outside the clinic's doors.

The defendants were later targeted and arrested by the FBI for "conspiracy against rights secured by the FACE Act, and committing FACE Act violations."

The Justice Department issued a release in Oct. 2022 that states: "Gallagher utilized social media to promote a series of anti-abortion events scheduled for March 4-7, 2021, in the Nashville area. Other co-conspirators then utilized Facebook to coordinate travel and logistics and to identify other participants for the blockade."

"In his social media post, Gallagher referred to the blockade as a 'rescue,'" the release states. "Boyd also began a Facebook livestream broadcast of the clinic blockade at 7:45 a.m. on March 5, 2021. This livestream broadcast was titled, in part, 'Mt. Juliet, TN Rescue March 5, 2021,' and livestreamed the blockade event as his co-conspirators and others blocked the clinic’s entry doors and prevented a patient and an employee from entering."

"The livestream also broadcast members of the group attempting to engage a patient and her companion as Boyd told his livestream audience that the patient was a 'mom coming to kill her baby,'" according to the release.

Video footage obtained by the Daily Signal shows FBI agents arriving at the home of defendant Paul Vaughn. Federal authorities placed him in handcuffs and took him into custody.

Vaughn told the outlet that the FBI arrived at his home with "guns pointed at the door, banging on the house, yelling and screaming, ‘Open up. FBI,’ that kind of thing. When I opened the door and saw the guns pointed at me, I asked them what they wanted, who they were looking for, and they said they wanted me."

"I had kids in the yard walking out to get in the car to go to school, I was about to take them to school, and other kids in the house," he said. "So, seeing that the easiest path to de-escalation was me in handcuffs, I stepped outside and put an end to the ranting and the banging and the yelling."

Vaughn was represented by Thomas More Society attorneys in March, who argued that the Department of Justice under President Biden has exhibited a consistent tendency to selectively enforce the FACE Act against individuals who are pro-life.

Vaughn's attorneys petitioned the court to vacate the indictment levied by the DOJ on the grounds of selective prosecution. They contended that the FACE Act, which regulates speech based on content and violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, is an unconstitutional regulation.

"Defendants submit that the government has engaged in selective and/or vindictive prosecution motivated by an intent to punish defendants for the content of their viewpoints and their protected expressions thus making this case an unconstitutional application of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act," the filing states, according to the Daily Signal.

"In addition, FACE is an unconstitutional content-based regulation of speech; as applied, it violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, as well as the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment; and this court lacks jurisdiction because, especially after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, FACE is an invalid exercise of Congress’ Commerce Clause authority," it continues.

Furthermore, the court filing adds that the Justice Department arrested Vaughn "and ten other defendants into court for a single alleged nonviolent violation" of the FACE Act “with over 170 uncharged incidents of destruction and vandalism at pro-life centers and churches across the country."

"The DOJ has demonstrated clear and illegal hostility toward the pro-life viewpoint in its statements and enforcement decisions, running roughshod over fundamental religious freedoms and free speech rights, and bringing an illegal selective prosecution here,” the filing alleges.

Article Link

Archive
 
I'm happy for that to happen. You would've been able to infer that position from my post if you hadn't chosen to abort your intelligence by preferring circle jerking with retards to reading comprehension. I'm also happy to make it a physical lesson if you're ever trying to have a "political protest" in front of a doorway I'm trying to walk through
We've got a tough guy here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony Vivaldi
You do realise this site is on the clear net and and you've just confirmed what I said about you being mentally retarded with no reading comprehension right? And that doubling down on stupidity doesn't make it less embarrassing?
I don't care what you say or think.
You don't believe in basic human rights.
 
That's because you're projecting your own insincerety and someone with principles is as incomprehensible to you as someone hitting puberty before him is to the shmuck who thinks he should be allowed to impregnate 12 year olds. What I'm saying is I'll walk through an asshole trying to block me even if I agree with their cause.
The guy I threw off the escalator was merely a workman's apprentice who was tasked with stopping people from using an escalator that was blocked at one end due to maintenance. His cause was just but he tried to prosecute it in an inappropriate way, instead of wearing a uniform or telling me the way was blocked he tried to play Gandalf with the wrong balrog.

God I miss the days when the left was well-meaning but hopelessly naive and the right was the opposite. When did that switch around?
Touch grass
 
(even many mothers getting abortion are innocent because as Ben Shapiro pointed out, due to pro-abortion & anti-natal propaganda these women are ignorant about what they're doing).
aw babe, come on. Absolutely no-one going for an abortion doesn't know what they are doing or what outcome they desire. They know exactly that they want fetus deletus. People of both genders don't talk about "getting rid of it" because they don't understand the products of conception will be destroyed.

This "they do not know what they do" stuff is a weird righty flex to somehow condemn abortion whilst not condemning the people who choose to have abortions done. It's not a sensible distinction. If moral and ethical blame attaches to anyone in this situation, it can only attach to the person who agrees to have it done. (I would separate out kids whose parents make the decision for them.) They know exactly what they are doing, and they go ahead and do it.

I would agree that a significant number of people getting abortions via medication and being sent home to "pass the tissue" have no idea quite how bloody and lumpy that can be, but as with all elective procedures, it's on the patient to get a clue about what the procedure and recovery involves.

Standard disclaimer: no I have not had any abortions
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hweeks
That's a completely not retarded response to a real life anecdote, can't imagine why you're all losing a debate to a solitary feminist this badly. Ironically I was on my way to purchase grass when it happened.
Did it really take you a month of seething before coughing up this nigger cattle response? Women amirite?
 
aw babe, come on. Absolutely no-one going for an abortion doesn't know what they are doing or what outcome they desire. They know exactly that they want fetus deletus. People of both genders don't talk about "getting rid of it" because they don't understand the products of conception will be destroyed.

This "they do not know what they do" stuff is a weird righty flex to somehow condemn abortion whilst not condemning the people who choose to have abortions done.
"Men's rights activists" are sub IQ 80, they don't understand that other people might want things, they simply don't have enough processing power to run a mental model of another person. Case in point, multiple threads where an unborn baby is killed and them whining about the perp getting punished for a baby-killing: "no, it should be vandalism / property destruction / etc", they simply don't understand that women might want kids.

Note that it doesn't prevent them from sneeding about "baby fever", "clock ticking" etc which presuppose that every woman must want kids, they don't see the contradiction because they can't imagine a woman (or another man) wanting anything. To them it's just mash keyboard, get sticker, ooga booga.
 
"Men's rights activists" are sub IQ 80, they don't understand that other people might want things, they simply don't have enough processing power to run a mental model of another person. Case in point, multiple threads where an unborn baby is killed and them whining about the perp getting punished for a baby-killing: "no, it should be vandalism / property destruction / etc", they simply don't understand that women might want kids.

Note that it doesn't prevent them from sneeding about "baby fever", "clock ticking" etc which presuppose that every woman must want kids, they don't see the contradiction because they can't imagine a woman (or another man) wanting anything. To them it's just mash keyboard, get sticker, ooga booga.
 
Did it really take you a month of seething before coughing up this nigger cattle response?
Do you want me to touch grass or do you want me sit in here hitting refresh all day? When you've decided maybe go ahead and click dumb on whichever one of your answers you're more embarrassed by. It'll save me the trouble because I can promise you nobody thinks about you when you're not in the same room, least of all me.
 
Do you want me to touch grass or do you want me sit in here hitting refresh all day? When you've decided maybe go ahead and click dumb on whichever one of your answers you're more embarrassed by. It'll save me the trouble because I can promise you nobody thinks about you when you're not in the same room, least of all me.
Just post the Navy Seals copy pasta next time, tough guy.
 
Back