Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
It’s over, vaushites, we know about the loli horse porn.
 
It's just drawings, I don't know what any of you guys are freaking out about.

I'm still over here trying to fathom why this faggot allows himself to be seen looking like this and still has the audacity to sperg about men's fashion.
Because it's just funny as fuck that Vaush is a degenerate coomer that jacks it to weeb shit. Hopefully(🌈) his braindead young followers will reject him and find something worthwhile to spend their time on instead of circlejerking breadtubers.
 
Last edited:
Which isn't the point, because it's disgusting enough that he likes children
While that is true, just because it's AI generated doesn't really wash away any marginal effect it has on children victimized by that kind of thing. Those generative models still had to be trained on genuine data of some sort or another. I personally think it's sort of disturbing that someone went and likely hashed the products of, potentially, a bunch people's traumas into a pure mathematical structure that can produce more of it on demand.

At best it has the same marginal effect on children as regular loli, at worst someone's abuse got turned into a component of a disturbing numeric Potpourri. There is also an interesting case for, like, legislation here. Idk about the law side of things, but a generative model trained on actual real CP isn't itself CP, you can't even recover the original images used in training. So I don't even know the legal status of this nightmare.

Imagine explaining to the Unabomber that while he was locked up we figured out how to make computers produce child pornography lmao
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Smar Mijou
View attachment 5702100
I know the resolution is shit but there's nothing I can do about it. The picture in the xxx gifs folder looks like a balding tranny. We all know that Vaush is a notorious troon chaser.
Impossible to tell since I can only see the head from the eyes down.

Seeing as how that's an animated GIF, I doubt it's even a real person, probably a 3D porno render of some vidya character. It looks like none of Vaush's porn is of real people.
 
Seriously keep that in a separate folder how hard is it
Don't keep a folder at all. Don't look for it. Don't download it. Don't have anything to do with it. Period. End of story.

How difficult is that?

None of this shit surprises me with these people anymore. It's no wonder they say the things they do--it's all a cover for their own degeneracy. I cannot fucking believe people have ever wanted to debate Vaush and take him seriously.

"These people want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny." ~Sam Hyde
 
While that is true, just because it's AI generated doesn't really wash away any marginal effect it has on children victimized by that kind of thing. Those generative models still had to be trained on genuine data of some sort or another. I personally think it's sort of disturbing that someone went and likely hashed the products of, potentially, a bunch people's traumas into a pure mathematical structure that can produce more of it on demand.

At best it has the same marginal effect on children as regular loli, at worst someone's abuse got turned into a component of a disturbing numeric Potpourri. There is also an interesting case for, like, legislation here. Idk about the law side of things, but a generative model trained on actual real CP isn't itself CP, you can't even recover the original images used in training. So I don't even know the legal status of this nightmare.

Imagine explaining to the Unabomber that while he was locked up we figured out how to make computers produce child pornography lmao
Artificially created photorealistic depictions are illegal if you can't tell it's fake by looking at it it's treated as real if it's obviously fake it can be charged as CP if the material is deemed to be obscene which sounds easy in theory but in practice no prosecutor wants to do anything with obscenity laws unless they have to for a number of reasons. I don't think the model itself is currently illegal it's output probably is. The only difference I can potentially see for this is that AI loli would probably immediately fail the artistic merit test as it's hard to argue it having any artistic merit because well no artist ergo you can't argue it having some deeper or important meaning.

Edit: all of this only applies to the USA notably
 
Last edited:
Dude, this is so stupid that I can't believe it was unintentional, it's not possible for someone to be so dumb and carefree to that point.
It most certainly wasn't intentional. This is no different than spouses discovering their husband or wife was cheating on them later on down the line. People are usually careful the first few times they do something they know they're not supposed to do, but if they keep on doing it they eventually become lazy about it. Sometimes people forget to lock their phones, erase their internet history, browse in incognito mode, etc. It's why you don't start any of this in the first place because, eventually, you will get caught.

There isn't a doubt in my mind that Vaush just wasn't being vigilant because this is more than likely something he has been doing constantly.
 
For a few hours I’ve been trying to make a joke about how Vaush and his obsession for horse cock led to his downfall but every set up I tried to make is just terribly unfunny.
In the words of the calmest scotsman to ever live,

Artificially created photorealistic depictions are illegal if you can't tell it's fake by looking at it it's treated as real if it's obviously fake it can be charged as CP if the material is deemed to be obscene which sounds easy in theory but in practice no prosecutor wants to do anything with obscenity laws unless they have to for a number of reasons. I don't think the model itself is currently illegal it's output probably is the only difference I can potentially see for this is that AI loli would probably immediately fail the artistic merit test as it's hard to argue it having any artistic merit because well no artist ergo you can't argue it having some deeper or important meaning.

Edit: all of this only applies to the USA notably
Thank you, that was actually very informative!
 
Back