Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The short stack stock has plummeted ever since vaush used it as a defense. This is a dark day for people spanking it to Dwarven women all over the world
Liking bearded women is gay, real shortstacksigmas like gnomes.
 
You know your argument concerning CP (or anything really) is really bad when even fucking Rational Wiki struggles to defend you.

1707636463343.png

"Alright Alright... here's the thing. He's TOTALLY against CP. HONEST! But ummm... yeah... his argument was really badly worded."

I'm surprised the rest of Breadtube hasn't disavowed him as brand damaging, but maybe I shouldn't be.
 
He'll probably try and leave the internet for a couple months, maybe a year, and see if this blows over, but I doubt it will. Very few people recover from sex scandals like this. Cryaotic had to move in with his sister after his scandal came out.
It’s a possibility; or his friends will do damage control and he’ll try develop a persecution complex and just cry “misinformation”

His fans are some of the most mentally ill mongoloids in existence. They are pseudo-intellectuals and if they lose Vaush, they lose their prophet who is the only person in their life who makes them feel smart.

My favorite part is when he mentions @Null only in passing and while the Farms is alluded to by the major players in the video, no one says it by name.
Genuinely hilarious how Booblax doesn't know who CoachRedPill is.

EDIT: Sorry for the doublepost, I didn't mean to :(
 
As a certified shortstack enjoyer I can't believe that fucking retard would think for a second anyone would actually buy that excuse. also great excuse to post rape horse. View attachment 5712163
7be.png
Also, another issue is that Vaush has videos calling anime full of degeneracy when he himself revels in said degeneracy.
I've noticed a lot of people that go out of their way to talk about or "spread awareness of" anime degeneracy wind up being into the stuff themselves.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised the rest of Breadtube hasn't disavowed him as brand damaging, but maybe I shouldn't be.
what rest of breadtube? its like five astroturfed people and hasan who is mostly only popular for non political low iq reasons but he makes that crowd feel like theyre political, and hasan disavowed him. ig hbomberguy? contra already hates him, philosophy tube and thought slime too iirc, and they dont really get traction with other groups because theyre boring anyway
 
You know your argument concerning CP (or anything really) is really bad when even fucking Rational Wiki struggles to defend you.

View attachment 5712305

"Alright Alright... here's the thing. He's TOTALLY against CP. HONEST! But ummm... yeah... his argument was really badly worded."

I'm surprised the rest of Breadtube hasn't disavowed him as brand damaging, but maybe I shouldn't be.
All these people talk like they're fags and their shit's all retarded. You see he compared it to blah blah blah he has since admitted blah blah blah and now (he) advocates blah blah blah lol shut up it's child porn. There is no great philosophical depth to sound here unless the guy who wants to do the sounding is a retard. Or likes the idea of sounding a ten year old's depths with his (in this case, fantasy literal horse) dick
 
Do you know what's funny about this?
18 U.S. Code § 2252 - under federal law child pornography is defined as verbatim "Any DEPICTION of a child engaged in a sexually explicit conduct". Any depiction. I does not have to be a video or a photograph. It can be AI-generated imagery, a pasta collage, a crayon drawing, a fucking statue if you will. Loli falls squarely under this statute. Now there's two tests to this: 1. the image has to be indistinguishable from an actual child (real or fictional) - loli is meant to portray children so it's not an issue. The image also has to have a artistic or scientific value to be protected under first ammendment- images of children getting fucked by horses are neither a work of art nor an image from a physiology textbook.
What's even funnier: people have been prosecuted and sentenced for mere posession of lolicon under US federal law. The feds usually don't go after loli itself but if Vaush is ever a subject of a federal investigation and the feds get in possession of his hard drives... yeah.
>B-But a miller test and allthat
Here's how it usually works:
-You get charged with posession of a depiction of a child engaged in a sexually explicit conduct
-You plead guilty: you're fucked. It's federal sex offender registry including minors, most likely some federal prison time and a fine. Judges are not amused when they see this kind of shit.
-You plead not guilty: you're absolutely fucked. You get sat in front of a "jury of your peers" meaning that store clerk miller from Wisconsin, aunt Carlie from Texas and farmer Mcmann from Minnesota will be shown those images in a redacted form and given the statute with an instruction: does the person possess a depiction of a child engaged in a sexually explicit conduct? The child being a 2000-year old dragon is not a defense with normal people from all over the country btw. You are then sentenced and federal courts punish people for pleading not guilty all the time. You can be sentenced to whatever the judge deems adequate, you don't have points for taking "ownership of the offense" (aka pleading guilty) and each and every picture is a different count of the felony.
>B-but he can appeal and the appelant court will say that loli IS legal because I say so!
Loli is an inherently murky area of US law because it's rarely prosecuted. The feds prefer to go after material presenting actual children. But currently as it is loli IS contraband under federal law. And whether depictions of children are child pornography is no a question that's on the mind of every appelant judge or on the mind of the federal court. They chances of winning on appeal are miniscule and the process takes years. While you're sitting in a federal prison. As a convicted sex offender against children. You think the 2000-year old dragon defense will work on Tyrone from next cell when he gets the hold of your paperwork?
The moral being: the loli subhumans are pedophiles and they belong in federal penitentiary, Vaush included. The law says so, God says so and I say so.
 
You know your argument concerning CP (or anything really) is really bad when even fucking Rational Wiki struggles to defend you.

View attachment 5712305

"Alright Alright... here's the thing. He's TOTALLY against CP. HONEST! But ummm... yeah... his argument was really badly worded."

I'm surprised the rest of Breadtube hasn't disavowed him as brand damaging, but maybe I shouldn't be.

... Although child slaboury and child pornography are both heinous there is something about his argument that irks me.

Perhaps that pornography should not be compared to the production of goods? I just feel they shouldn't be in the same category.

Another Vaush L!
 
>Likes VTubers
>Is a pedophile


Like clockwork, baby!
You know what I find funny about that? According to his own words he didn't know it was a vtuber. He doesn't even have the excuse that he knew it was an adult puppeting the avatar, he just thought it was some random character. This retard shot down the one (shaky as hell) excuse he had. Now granted he could've been lying about that but I really do think he didn't know where it came from, mostly because he likely downloaded the images in that folder from his or some other coomer discord server. I'm guessing that's why he had several Chainsaw Man images in a row, he probably saved several chat or server's image dumps and one of them was Chainsaw Man porn...

Jesus that's fucking sad. Imagine being such a coomer you not only look in a discord porn chat, you check several server's porn chat in case there's stuff you missed.
 
It is CP. According to the PROTECT Act of 2003, lolicon meets the federal criteria for child pornography. If you are caught in possession of lolicon or shotacon, you could face federal criminal charges and significant prison time if convicted.

Not an expert here, but afaik someone could bring charges against him.

On that note, why hasn't his stream been banned for this?
The problem with this, I believe, is that simple possession of lolicon isn't illegal. You can only bring federal charges if there is enough proof to suggest that you intended to sell or distribute lolicon, or obtained it from somebody directly through the internet by e-mail, mail, or a carrier.

There are two "possession" charges: simple possession and possession (think drugs). Simple possession is when you have small quantities of it with no intention to sell it. Possession is if you have a lot of it with the intention to sell or distribute it. Merely having some pictures of lolicon pornography on your computer is creepy, but will probably not land you in jail. That's probably why anime image hosting websites that contain fringe content like this haven't been taken down from Western servers. They're merely displaying it with no "intention" on distributing it.

There's also the notion of what "obscene" means in a legal standing in the United States, which is another can of worms that I can't wrap my head around.

This is all just speculation of course, but I would not be surprised if Vaush had no prison time for this.
 
Last edited:
Vaush's obsession with debating
I hate the "debate bro" shtick it's so fucking retarded, these people stream for a living. If they didn't they'd either get a tugboat or begging on the street, as everyone knows they'd be unemployed. They aren't a politician that is challenged on their views on why the people should vote for him. These people are streamers that take politics and activism too seriously. Plus all of them argue in bad faith, create strawmen, and use logical fallices all the time.

Rant aside, no one on the left cared about this until Ethan Klein needed something juicy to use for his podcast. Now they're eating each other. It's not like these things were new or a secret. Hell, I knew about vaush's propensity for horse cock, loli, and his thoughts on cp for years because of the thread. His ideas are reprehensible and are way more dangerous than an Internet forum that says the nigger word and gossips about retards. Thanks to faggot like vaush and his band of chromosonally challenged misfits, the younger people that watch him have the belief that owning csam should be decriminalized. I understand the point he was trying to make how child slaves make products that people buy everyday, but conflating those two things are very different. When buying something, the person is ignorant to who's making the parts for the product. If someone is watching cp, they are completely aware of what went down to make it and they are active in creating the demand for more.
 
Also the second part of this post. From a leftist perspective what is wrong with what Vaush did ?
We've known this for years, atleast I thought we did, the Left is cannibalistic. They don't actually hold morals or values up to their own side, and only bring it up when they smell blood in the water.

This is why H3H3 can get away with so much shit (like calling for Ben Shapiro to be gassed or having had a right wing-adjacent history) whereas Idubbz has to basically live as a constant whipping boy apologising for what he did, because H3 has a far more secure position and more influence in leftist sphere.

H3 also has the advantage that (he seems to be) far less moralfaggy and ignores stuff that's potentially damaging to him, like the autistic defence of Israel that progs hate.
 
... Although child slaboury and child pornography are both heinous there is something about his argument that irks me.

Perhaps that pornography should not be compared to the production of goods? I just feel they shouldn't be in the same category.

Another Vaush L!
Hard to imagine your child being used as slave labor over here in the west. You hear about children being raped often enough though, and many people know someone who was diddled or abused as a kid., so there's a massive relatability aspect at play.

I'd also strongly argue that child rape is a different and worse type of evil to child slavery, but ranking these things is both a trap and a fools game, and just serves to obfuscate the main point: Vaush defends the use of CP. In multiple ways, multiple times.
 
Back