Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Honestly, something that makes me really internally roll my eyes is when women express
their frustration with being blamed for the current state of the world, only to have smug retards crawl out of the woodwork and go:

"Well...This is just how men felt when they were blamed for everything for the past 10 years...Enjoy your turn ladies :smug:"

Which to that I say, NIGGER, women have been blamed for everything since dawn of civilization!! It's nothing new!! Women have been literally blamed for:

  • Ruination, corruptions and falls of empire and kingdoms, just look at Chinese and Roman history to see how often this occurred, look there many cases of women being accused of puppeteering emperors behind the curtains when he'd be a major fuck-up

  • For not birthing strong leaders and soldiers, if the current leader/king/emperor was a weak and soldiers were also weak men, it's always because those evil mothers corrupted them by coddling them

  • For the sin of birthing baby girls (Just look at Henry VIII) or men that
    turned into terrible people

  • Preventing men from advancing academically, job-wise or achieving some sort of enlightenment, because women just dragged them down

  • For men underperforming in their jobs, because their wives weren't good
    wives thus overburdening them
I can go on, but this post would be long, but my point is all these retards pretending that women being blamed for everything is something entire new and are upset that 10 years ago retarded Tumblrinas gave them sperm cramps, would probably kill themselves if they even got a fraction of blaming and being scapegoated as women did through history.
 
Last edited:
Oh no moidsisters, is the plan backfiring?

GGLuEqrX0AANQmb.jpeg
 
Arab women : suffering and dying

Terminally online moid that stinks up his basement with his greasy balls
and hasn't left it for 3 days: How can I weaponize the suffering of women
for my gay ideology, politics and le epic checkmates?

View attachment 5717115View attachment 5717136
Wheeeeere are the feminiiiiiists?? <-moids who pay zero attention to women's organizations and feminist chatter.

  • Ruination, corruptions and falls of empire and kingdoms, just look at Chinese and Roman history to see
    how often this occurred, look there many cases of women being accused of puppeteering emperors
    behind the curtains when he'd be a major fuck-up
This. I wanted to get into Chinese history because of the battle aesthetic, drama, and games (romance of the three kingdoms is like its own genre lol). But when I started studying it, the only mentions of women are when they are evil concubines or nth wife of some important guy, also palace harem shenanigans. It's still interesting, but it's so male it reeks.
 
"despite her wealth, she's very low quality "
Lmao , literally treating women like meatsack. Years ago, I would have think it was satire.
Anyway, don't you hate how men treat mid-looking women like freaks of nature but hype up ugly men? Even if a woman is conventionally attractive, they'd find anything about her appearance to criticize and grossly exaggerate her features when describing her.
I'm gonna be very autistic here, but I'm a cartoon nerd and I made the mistake to visit /co/ way too often. There was a thread about Dan povenwire, co-creator of Phineas and Ferb divorcing his wife (who's young enough to be his daughter). The anons went on how he's a good looking man, a "silver fox" who could definitely pull off any other women 30 years younger than him. This is what he looks like
View attachment 5717635
This picture also got a lot of disgust toward Rebecca on the right, despite her husband on the left not being any more attractive than her.
View attachment 5717642
Men just can't imagine settling down with a woman their own age and own range of attractiveness.
Okay, but that picture of Dan makes him look uncannily like kissless porn-addicted autist Jon Frímann:

1000011775.png

And, you know what, good for Rebecca and her husband there. They may not be supermodels, but they look happy, and that's more than the moids slagging them off can say.
 
My husband is away on a trip and before he left I did his hair up in a bun. These past three days he’s been messaging me pictures of bobby pins he’s “discovered” while showering.
Forgetting I used pins is one thing, but how do you go through multiple showers without finding them all? I suspect he’s trying to keep the bun intact so he won’t have to figure out how to redo it himself.
 
Moids often blame birth control for contaminating the water supply and lowering testosterone levels in men and making everyone gay, and often use this claim to justify banning it. Or to shame women who are on it.

It’s all so tiring.
Remind them that EE2 is easily filtered out of water and the vast majority (>90%) of estriadol contamination comes from livestock waste, and then ask them if we should ban meat or shame men who eat it.
4a2defb8-3e3f-4275-9001-306b58f7127b_screenshot.jpg
I think them pretending to have really high standards is how they overcompensate for how horny and desperate they are. They really wish they were the selectors instead of the beggars so they just LARP as picky. Them being constantly mean about women's bodies is fueled by anger over how undesirable they themselves feel.
What really vexes me is that these same men have asked women to be these gatekeepers of sexual access. Plenty of guys here think it is a woman's job to discern the asshole users and abusers from the Mr. Bigs and Mr. Rights, and if they choose wrong or exploited by bad men, well, that woman should have known better. And yet, the men are also mad because women have to be the gatekeepers of sexual access and can say "no" to a man, can choose a partner he wouldn't have chosen, can break up with him unilaterally. How are the women supposed to do what men say is our evo-psych duty and choose the right men, the ones who won't rape, don't cheat, who will "treat you right" if you have no tools to get the dense and boorish suitors to GTFO?

It is very scary. Step-Moms can be a nightmare, but I've known several Step-Fathers who view the kids in their care as minor inconveniences at best, objects at worst.
No, there are much worse things that can happen between a step-dad and his step-daughter. They can do so much worse than that.
 
No, there are much worse things that can happen between a step-dad and his step-daughter. They can do so much worse than that.
That's what I meant by objects. I didn't feel a need to be explicit about what can happen.

Moids often blame birth control for contaminating the water supply and lowering testosterone levels in men and making everyone gay, and often use this claim to justify banning it. Or to shame women who are on it.

It’s all so tiring.
This one is actually new to me on the "reasons people want BC banned" list. That's pretty insane.
 
That's what I meant by objects. I didn't feel a need to be explicit about what can happen.


This one is actually new to me on the "reasons people want BC banned" list. That's pretty insane.
I figured but some of the moids hate-reading this thread are incapable of abstract thought so I thought I would say the implied part out loud.
 
Geckos on dick in the vaush thread now pasta fucking is there anything that men don't stick their dick into?

Also lol can i say full sleeve tattoos are like the tramp stamp on men .
Lets not talk about kero the Wolf....
No, theres absolutely nothing thats off limits for a horny scrote.
 
Gorls, how much does it make you seethe when whuite men that no white woman wants go to asia to buy a wife?

View attachment 5716394

Aren't you incredibly jealous to be missing out on this man now that you see him with a hot TRADWIFE?! Don't you wish you could have him now?! Well it's too late bitches! All the undesirable undersocialized autistic porn addicted 1/10 men are going to Asia and there's nothing you can do about it! Cope and seethe! You had your chance you entitled Stacies!
Tbh, Big Ed is a beaner
 
Can someone clue me in here? I thought white moids and moidettes hated the NFL because of Colin Kaepernick and the kneeling. I was under the impression that NFL stood for ”Nigger Fuckin Large.” Yet they’re all sore in the ass over Taylor Swift taking attention away from Their Game? When did it become acceptable to watch the NFL again?
 
Can someone clue me in here? I thought white moids and moidettes hated the NFL because of Colin Kaepernick and the kneeling. I was under the impression that NFL stood for ”Nigger Fuckin Large.” Yet they’re all sore in the ass over Taylor Swift taking attention away from Their Game? When did it become acceptable to watch the NFL again?
Wider society doesn't give a fuck about whatever twitter tantrums wignats are having on any particular day, normal people might have complained about Kaepernick's dumb protest but none of them boycotted the NFL over it.
 
One argument from the male supremacy types that I cannot stand is: "Well, if women are truly equal to men, why have they historically contributed so little in terms of discoveries and accomplishments? Hm? :smug:"
Probably, because they were preoccupied with bearing, birthing, feeding and raising their 5 (often more!) children, to say nothing of all the housework they also had to do on top of that. Doesn't leave much time for formulating theorems or philosophical debates, does it?
babies-per-woman-1024x645.png

And, even if you take that argument at face value, you have to consider the fact that the human civilization would have still existed if things like electricity or antibiotics were never invented, but we would've gone completely extinct if no one was birthing and bringing up childen.
Begs the question of whose contribution to the civilization was more significant after all.
 
One argument from the male supremacy types that I cannot stand is: "Well, if women are truly equal to men, why have they historically contributed so little in terms of discoveries and accomplishments? Hm? :smug:"
Probably, because they were preoccupied with bearing, birthing, feeding and raising their 5 (often more!) children, to say nothing of all the housework they also had to do on top of that. Doesn't leave much time for formulating theorems or philosophical debates, does it?
View attachment 5724810

And, even if you take that argument at face value, you have to consider the fact that the human civilization would have still existed if things like electricity or antibiotics were never invented, but we would've gone completely extinct if no one was birthing and bringing up childen.
Begs the question of whose contribution to the civilization was more significant after all.
Women also weren't allowed to be in school and universities or any male professions. Men will literally use them oppressing women for all of human history as a gotcha against us somehow. 🙄
 
One argument from the male supremacy types that I cannot stand is: "Well, if women are truly equal to men, why have they historically contributed so little in terms of discoveries and accomplishments? Hm? :smug:"
Probably, because they were preoccupied with bearing, birthing, feeding and raising their 5 (often more!) children, to say nothing of all the housework they also had to do on top of that. Doesn't leave much time for formulating theorems or philosophical debates, does it?
View attachment 5724810

And, even if you take that argument at face value, you have to consider the fact that the human civilization would have still existed if things like electricity or antibiotics were never invented, but we would've gone completely extinct if no one was birthing and bringing up childen.
Begs the question of whose contribution to the civilization was more significant after all.
And when women did have opportunities to explore scientific pursuits, they were often explicitly shunned from scientific institutions and organizations likes Mary Anning (one of the most important early paleontologists who wasn't allowed to join relevant scientific institutions of her time since she was a woman).

Most people know Beatrix Potter as a children's book author, but she was actually an accomplished mycologist whose drawings of fungi and plants are still considered to be of exceptional quality. Unfortunately she wasn't allowed to participate in formal scientific organizations, so she had to settle with making children's books.

Countless other women throughout history were in the same boat. When they weren't having their discoveries straight up stolen and claimed by moids (i.e. Rosalind Franklin).

Hell, I've heard Einstein's wife was actually a better mathematician than him and contributed to a lot of discoveries and theories exclusively credited to him.
 
Last edited:
Back