Careercow Wil Wheaton + Felicia Day - The "Man" who soy'd the World and the Fakest of Geek Girls, SJW sexual harassment fence-sitters

  • Thread starter Thread starter LN 910
  • Start date Start date

Pick a side

  • Wil "Soyboy" Wheaton

  • Felicia "Crybaby" Day

  • That shotgun’s looking pretty good right about now...

  • Just shut the fuck up Wesley

  • Felicia blew me for this vote


Results are only viewable after voting.
I used to have the DVDs of season 1, and apparently Gene Roddenberry had a rule that there should be no references to the original series (I agree with this, otherwise it would have degenerated into a fanfic show). But apparently he decided to just break it anyway in the second episode of the show because he liked the episode. Apparently nobody else did.
Not to get too far afield from laughing at Wil Wheaton, the behind the scenes stuff that has come out over the years from the first three or four years of TNG is really interesting. Between Roddenberry sniffing his own farts and deciding an unrealistic future where men had perfected themselves to the viper's nest that was the producers and how they drove the best writers away to how catty the actors have been over the years makes for some compelling reading.
 
She was bad in the new MST3K but so was everyone so I can't blame her for what was clearly a doomed production.

She was actually one of the cleaner ends of that turd. The scripts/her lines were fucking awful, but that's on the writing. I don't like them as people but I can't really fault her or Oswald for their performances.
 
She was actually one of the cleaner ends of that turd. The scripts/her lines were fucking awful, but that's on the writing. I don't like them as people but I can't really fault her or Oswald for their performances.
I absolutely can and will, simply because they showed up.

The whole production to me reeked of the "cool kids who thought this geeky thing solidifies their geek cred".

MST3K's charm was the fact that it was produced by some Midwestern schlubs who simply didn't have the backing to produce something polished the way a moneyed outfit might. So when you have wannabe big shots that have at least some amount of glory off the backs of nerd culture picking up the mantle and trying to look low-brow, it looks deeply inauthentic.

I read one review of the movie "The Menu" as something to the effect that it (being an "eat the rich" sort of movie) was written by the kind of people who have never had student loans. That's what nu-MST3K reminded me of. The "hey fellow poors" of it all just turned me right off, and much like every soulless cash grab remake you've ever seen, if you showed up for it, you were undoubtedly aware of what you were doing, and you've earned all the disdain you get for it.
 
Something I never got with the concept of Wesley was what Roddenberry was thinking when he conceived of the character. One of his dictates for TOS was if something wouldn't be realistic on the bridge of the USS Iowa battleship, then it shouldn't be on the bridge of the starship Enterprise. Meaning, a civilian child as the helmsman. Fast forward twenty years and suddenly Roddenberry was fine with it. I get the whole ego thing Roddenberry had, and Wesley was his underappreciated self-insert, but what changed?

Had he made Wesley a fresh out of the academy ensign, who was put in there in the Chekov role to see the universe through fresh eyes (and gotten teenage girls to tune in), that would have been great. But for Picard to put an untrained boy behind the wheel is just too unrealistic, even for Star Trek. I mean, what was Picard's defense at his court-martial going to be when he gets the Enterprise shot out from under him and the untrained boy hit the wrong button on the bridge console? "But you don't understand, he's really, really smart!"
 
One of his dictates for TOS was if something wouldn't be realistic on the bridge of the USS Iowa battleship, then it shouldn't be on the bridge of the starship Enterprise. Meaning, a civilian child as the helmsman. Fast forward twenty years and suddenly Roddenberry was fine with it. I get the whole ego thing Roddenberry had, and Wesley was his underappreciated self-insert, but what changed?

I'm not fully conversant with Roddenberry's history or views, but it definitely seems in the years between TOS going off the air and the franchise being revived with the films he became less enamored with the military. Not only did he make such a 180-degree turn when it came to the nature of Starfleet (it's not just Wesley; why are there enough small children and families on board to necessitate a school?), but he quite infamously disliked the uniforms that debuted with Wrath of Khan for being too militaristic ... despite them being by far the most popular iteration of the uniform among the fanbase.

I'd be curious to learn more.
 
I mean, what was Picard's defense at his court-martial going to be when he gets the Enterprise shot out from under him and the untrained boy hit the wrong button on the bridge console? "But you don't understand, he's really, really smart!"
"His mom is really fucking hot and I was trying to get into that uniform."
1707871703710.png

Jim and Q knew what were up.
 
(it's not just Wesley; why are there enough small children and families on board to necessitate a school?)
It actually makes sense in a way. The USS Enterprise D wasn't just a military vessel. It was more like a roaming military/science base/embassy. Normally housed 1000 crew and family members, and I guess in roddenberry's ideal future entire families of starfleet personnel would venture off into the unknown... full of danger the entire time. Same thing with DS9, if you think of it like an overseas US military base in South Korea or something, it makes more sense. It's also why the Enterprise D had the saucer separation thing, so if it actually was needed for a strictly military operation they could leave the saucer section with all of the civilian and non combatant workers at a base/port/whatever and pick them up later. On top of that, it was supposed to house 12-15k people "comfortably" for a rescue operation, and more if absolutely necessary(on cots in cargo bays, etc.) as a disaster relief vessel. Remember, Starfleet wasn't purely a "military" organization by that point. It was practically a space UN cruise ship really. Voyager, the NX-01, originaly 1701, and 1701-A on the other hand were around the size of the drive section of the Enterprise D.
 
I have the impression that Roddenberry was something of a mild transhumanist too. It would explain the whole magic "space and time and thought aren't the separate things we think" theme that was visited several times in TNG, especially re: Wesley. Like the kid was going to be the next stage of human evolution and it had to be presented in a "from the mouths of babes and sucklings" way rather than via an adult crew member. 🤷‍♀️
 
I'm not fully conversant with Roddenberry's history or views, but it definitely seems in the years between TOS going off the air and the franchise being revived with the films he became less enamored with the military. Not only did he make such a 180-degree turn when it came to the nature of Starfleet (it's not just Wesley; why are there enough small children and families on board to necessitate a school?), but he quite infamously disliked the uniforms that debuted with Wrath of Khan for being too militaristic ... despite them being by far the most popular iteration of the uniform among the fanbase.

I'd be curious to learn more.
Clearly something had changed. Obviously in TV, show formats had changed somewhat. TOS was very much a Kirk/Spock/McCoy with the other six being recurring characters while on TNG the show was designed as an ensemble show color TV was the norm so the brighter colors of TOS gave way to a more muted color palette, the sets could no longer look like a studio backlot in late 1960s Burbank, and we had fewer and fewer human aliens in favor of forehead aliens. But something else had changed. TOS was very much an action show, which reflected the late 60s, where Kirk would just as readily throw fists and shoot a phaser and fire photon torpedoes as the next guy. And Picard was supposed to be an older, more reflective Kirk-type character while Riker was supposed to be a younger and more brash Kirk-type character. But TNG didn't have the same kind of action. Worf would get thrown around like a rag doll just to show us how dangerous the badguy was, but Riker rarely got into a fistfight. Kirk would gladly admit humanity was still striving to be better and would keep trying while Picard would pretty much just pontificate about how humanity got it all figured out (in the space of 80 years or so). The emotional drama of Spock working through his problems to get to the point where he could fix the technological hurdle was replaced with LaForge just running a diagnostic and then [TECHNOBABBLING] the [TECHNOBABBLE]. They even brought on Guinan as Picard's confidant, which essentially gave her Troi's job.

Of course, these are just generalizations and I can find episodes where Picard and Riker throw a fist and there are human looking aliens without latex foreheads. And not every change was for the better when Pillar took over for Roddenberry. Getting rid of the composers and musical cues in favor of sonic wallpaper for example. More holodeck stories (which was something Roddenberry was counselled against adding in the first place. One writer said if they have to have holodeck adventures to make the bleeding edge of the known universe interesting then they needed better writers), more story arcs instead of just an adventure and onto the next planet, more family shows up shows (which they had already had by that point with Riker's dad and Lwaxana Troi), more war (which was something Roddenberry was firmly against. He pulled FASA's STRPG license over it).
 
With all of this going on in the show(which I find genuinely fascinating @William Murderface), I'm starting to see why Wheaton has a love/hate relationship with TNG. The back-and-forth of politics between Roddenberry, the writers, and the cast is pretty much a terrible environment for a kid to be in. If you believe his stories about his home life, Wheaton pretty much was just surrounded by adults that failed him. No wonder he's such an insufferable prick.
 
Something I never got with the concept of Wesley was what Roddenberry was thinking when he conceived of the character. One of his dictates for TOS was if something wouldn't be realistic on the bridge of the USS Iowa battleship, then it shouldn't be on the bridge of the starship Enterprise. Meaning, a civilian child as the helmsman. Fast forward twenty years and suddenly Roddenberry was fine with it. I get the whole ego thing Roddenberry had, and Wesley was his underappreciated self-insert, but what changed?

Had he made Wesley a fresh out of the academy ensign, who was put in there in the Chekov role to see the universe through fresh eyes (and gotten teenage girls to tune in), that would have been great. But for Picard to put an untrained boy behind the wheel is just too unrealistic, even for Star Trek. I mean, what was Picard's defense at his court-martial going to be when he gets the Enterprise shot out from under him and the untrained boy hit the wrong button on the bridge console? "But you don't understand, he's really, really smart!"
TOS was based off the idea Starfleet is a future Space Navy. By the Motion Picture Gene wanted Starfleet to be of a Futuristic Version of NASA. Hence why the Enterprise-D had families. After Gene's Death Berman and the writers notably Ronald D. Moore made Starfleet see the folly in that when they redesigned the Fleet post Wolf 359 with the new ships not having family spaces and being for Starfleet Officers and Enlisted only even creating the Defiant Starfleet's 1st war ship. Voyager had some kids on it only because they were lost in the Delta Quadrant and Naomi was born on the ship and the Borg kids were refugees. Voyager wasn't built to have kids on board though.
 
With all of this going on in the show(which I find genuinely fascinating @William Murderface), I'm starting to see why Wheaton has a love/hate relationship with TNG. The back-and-forth of politics between Roddenberry, the writers, and the cast is pretty much a terrible environment for a kid to be in. If you believe his stories about his home life, Wheaton pretty much was just surrounded by adults that failed him. No wonder he's such an insufferable prick.
That's an interesting point I hadn't really considered. We know that the other actors were in the middle of a three-way tug-of-war with them and the writers and the producers from the beginning. Wheaton was 14 or so when he was thrown in the middle of a real toxic situation and was the only kid his age. And we know once Roddenberry was basically kicked off his own show Berman changed a lot of the dynamics and I guess didn't give Wheaton the same latitude Roddenberry had. He was probably a little resentful and it showed (because that's how teenagers are) and Berman gave it right back to him. There's the story about Wil asking for a particular episode off so he could go shoot some movie, Berman told him no, and Wil missed the movie. Just to rub salt in the wound, Berman made Wil sit that particular week out anyway for daring to ask for it off in the first place. Who knows, though? That could just be Wheaton's take on it where he's the victim, but a lot of Hollywood producers have a mean streak a mile wide and don't hesitate to stomp on actors.

TOS was based off the idea Starfleet is a future Space Navy. By the Motion Picture Gene wanted Starfleet to be of a Futuristic Version of NASA. Hence why the Enterprise-D had families. After Gene's Death Berman and the writers notably Ronald D. Moore made Starfleet see the folly in that when they redesigned the Fleet post Wolf 359 with the new ships not having family spaces and being for Starfleet Officers and Enlisted only even creating the Defiant Starfleet's 1st war ship. Voyager had some kids on it only because they were lost in the Delta Quadrant and Naomi was born on the ship and the Borg kids were refugees. Voyager wasn't built to have kids on board though.
That's fair, although I never took the TOS or TNG Starfleets to be exclusively Navy or NASA as much as something like the Royal Navy in the 18th and 19th century. They were a military when they needed to be, supported scientific, or diplomatic, or colonial operations, or law enforcement, or anti-slavery, or whatever else the Crown or Parliament needed them to do at any particular moment.

I think one of the premises of the show that was all but abandoned was that the Enterprise would be on the edge of known space and stay there when right from the start they seemed to spend half their time running around the Federation proper. The whole point of having families on board was so the characters wouldn't be cut off from loved ones (which was subverted when only one of the characters had a family and even then he was a child supergenius and should have been in some special school for wunderkinder and not tagging along with his mother). If they were going to just go from starbase to starbase, then they didn't need to be a floating town at all. Of course, they kind of changed VOY's premise as well, by changing it from a ship where the Starfleet and Maquis blended together and stuff was always breaking down and couldn't be replaced and crewmen and women were pairing up to the ship always being pristine and everyone acting like they were Starfleet all along and only Paris and Torres getting together. C'est la vie.
 
I had honestly forgotten Doctor Who was still airing new episodes in the late 80s, but that's probably since it got even less air time in the US than the UK. Before it came back again and wound up on "syfy", I only ever recall seeing it randomly on PBS stations.
I grew up watching Dr. Who in the 80s in NYC. Channel 31 UHF was leased to the BBC. Evenings we watched Dr. Who, Later on at night was Benny Hill. Also a good diet of Blake's 7. I was the weird kid in school who talked about TV shows no one ever heard of lol. That's what happens when your dad is an anglophile.

Anyone remember years ago when someone tweeted the Navy Seal copypasta at Wil's wife and they went nuts believing it was real and she made a big deal about it tweeting about how she was reporting it to the FBI or some shit. I remember she got bullied hardcore after that for falling for it.
 
And we know once Roddenberry was basically kicked off his own show Berman changed a lot of the dynamics and I guess didn't give Wheaton the same latitude Roddenberry had.
There's a bit of a fandom-gag that after Berman took over, really attractive females started appearing as the helm officers - almost like an apology, "we're sorry for Wesley, have some eye candy."
1707878656090.png1707878671610.png1707878692184.png1707878715949.png1707878751063.png
 
Something I never got with the concept of Wesley was what Roddenberry was thinking when he conceived of the character. One of his dictates for TOS was if something wouldn't be realistic on the bridge of the USS Iowa battleship, then it shouldn't be on the bridge of the starship Enterprise. Meaning, a civilian child as the helmsman. Fast forward twenty years and suddenly Roddenberry was fine with it. I get the whole ego thing Roddenberry had, and Wesley was his underappreciated self-insert, but what changed?

Had he made Wesley a fresh out of the academy ensign, who was put in there in the Chekov role to see the universe through fresh eyes (and gotten teenage girls to tune in), that would have been great. But for Picard to put an untrained boy behind the wheel is just too unrealistic, even for Star Trek. I mean, what was Picard's defense at his court-martial going to be when he gets the Enterprise shot out from under him and the untrained boy hit the wrong button on the bridge console? "But you don't understand, he's really, really smart!"
God I always hated that shit as a kid because I got the impression he was a simp, violating rules to favor the son of the redhead doctor he was banging (ngl I thought she was a hot milf at the time lol)

Rager was fine af and my favorite but all of them were fit
 
It's always telling that when the TNG cast get together on their own it's always the core seven Stewart, Frakes, McFadden, Spiner, Burton, Dorn, & Sirtis and never Wil. The only time they're with him is when a check is involved.

Hell, even Crosby and Goldberg get more invites than him.
De Lancie (Q) gets more invites than Wil.
 
Back