Thoughts?
View attachment 5726940
View attachment 5726941
Archive.
View attachment 5726943
Archive.
Or...better yet, you could have the ability to
kill your would be rapist so he never does it to you or anyone else. But these people are against that. Sam there follows Mouse, who had this to say:
View attachment 5726949
Archive.
These all seem to be more of a genderspecial/regular leftie people, but however they are a perfect example of what I really wanted to vent/talk about it.
First of all, how fucking retarded do you have to be that when people talk about sex crimes and how they can have a physical and a mental toll on victims, and how many of the victims of it say they'd rather be killed than experience that, they don't go "Wow, it's kind of fucked that many of sexual crimes victims would rather suffer death than deal with sexual crime being committed on them and the aftermath, especially if they are in extremely conformist society that strips them of value if they were raped", rather they jump to the most hysterical exaggerated conclusion of "SO YOU WANT ALL SEX CRIME VICTIMS DEAD?!".
There's a big reason why women in past especially ancient times and middle ages would kill themselves when they would see enemy armies/bandits arriving and pillaging neighboring villages.
Secondly, what the fuck is with leftists, especially left leaning men that advocate and defend pedophiles and sex offenders? Seriously. I've seen leftists put more effort into defending pedos, sex offenders, crying "Two wrongs doesn't make a right" and calls for rehabilitation when the topic of death penalty for nonces would be brought up than they ever put effort into defending marginalized groups they so allegedly care about.
I remember getting into a debate with a very sniveling left-leaning moid who was saying how pedos shouldn't be killed rather rehabilitated because
"being put on sex offender registry is already bad for them", which is absolutely fucking retarded because:
1)That's like calling a drug addict a junkie and thinking you can somehow shame them into not taking drugs because you put a label on them
2)Sex offenders, especially pedophiles tend to reoffend.
3) How is this fair to the victims? Why do pedophiles and sex offenders get to have a second chance along with ""healing and rehabilitation"" so they can return to how "things used to be", that is provided from tax payer's money, meanwhile the victims not only never can get a second chance in life, but they can never return to have things used to be and also have to pay for their therapy, healing and rehabilitation from their own pockets?
He also proceeded to go how sex offender registries itself are terrible, because of few minor cases where some teenagers would be put on the registry because they had a 2-5 year age gap relationship in a US states where it's illegal or something. Which is absolutely retarded reasoning to abolish the whole thing.
If I was an American I'd rather want my tax money to go to executing pedophiles and rapists along with supporting less fortunate families that had to deal with that than rehabilitating Epstein's chosen that will most likely after 2 years get caught with CP again.
"
