The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
But why lie, though? I mean, if nothing else, it immediately makes me suspicious when they give an obviously fake name. Like, there are plenty of Pajeet immigrants to Bongland, if they just said, "Hello to you, muddam, this is Satinder Shidsendastreet and I am calling from your phone company," or whatever, I would be much more inclined to believe them, because they have a name that it's far more probable someone from their ethnic background, who speaks with that kind of accent, would have.


People have talked about the incomptency of the Pajeet in this thread before, but it's like they're not even good at being deceitful.
 
Last edited:
Like, I can fucking tell from your durka-durka accent, nigger!
Oh no, I've heard scambaiters interrogate scammers, the scammers actually do think they sound American.
Because they mainly target old, senile, out of touch boomers. 73 year old Shirley won't immediately become suspicious when she receives a call from Abraham Washington at Best Trusted Phone Repair.
This might be an unpopular opinion, but with how widespread scam calls are, and with how well known they are, there's just no excuse other than literal dementia to fall for one.
"Hewwo my name ees John, and I'm cawling from de Micwosowft Windows Technicahl Depawtment, am I speaking with Mistar/Misses <your name here>?"
If you do NOT have dementia, and you hear someone with a clearly foreign accent who speaks in janky, broken Engrish, and you legitimately believe what they're saying, you deserve to lose your money.
 
oh boy
1707311181508171.jpg
 
I loathe India and Indians in a way that only a fellow Pajeet can understand. Yeah, it's ironic that a Pajeet would hate his fellow Pajeets at such a level, but the only fitting comparison I can give is the hatred of an Indianised Hood Mentality. (Laws are meant to be abused. Social niceties and consideration should be abused. Defrauding the System is respectable if you get money from it.)

It's intolerable how so many are coming to the UK legally. It can not be emphasised enough that the modern Indian, regardless of wealth, social class or caste, do not like you.
The sudden influx and acceptance of millions of Indian Immigrants to the West is a giant remittance scam, milking the coloniser for everything they have.

America, Canada, The United Kingdom, and now Israel + Japan are all soft targets to earn (and send back) money and buy (then rent) property, all done by abusing the laws and social conventions of the host nation.

Fuck, I don't even like the Sikhs arriving. They act and think like a bunch of niggers, with flashy cars and ostentatious clothes, blasting ethnic music as they ghettoise the area.
 
Last edited:
I loathe India and Indians in a way that only a fellow Pajeet can understand. Yeah, it's ironic that a Pajeet would hate his fellow Pajeets at such a level, but the only fitting comparison I can give is the hatred of an Indianised Hood Mentality. (Laws are meant to be abused. Social niceties and consideration should be abused. Defrauding the System is respectable if you get money from it.)

It's intolerable how so many are coming to the UK legally. It can not be emphasised enough that the modern Indian, regardless of wealth, social class or caste, do not like you.
The sudden influx and acceptance of millions of Indian Immigrants to the West is a giant remittance scam, milking the coloniser for everything they have.

America, Canada, The United Kingdom, and now Israel + Japan are all soft targets to earn (and send back) money and buy (then rent) property, all done by abusing the laws and social conventions of the host nation.

Fuck, I don't even like the Sikhs arriving. They act and think like a bunch of niggers, with flashy cars and ostentatious clothes, blasting ethnic music as they ghettoise the area.
Very apt. I wish more westerners would understand all of this. I've met so many people who can't grasp what people from low trust societies are like. It's not Indians where I'm at, at least not many, it's mostly africans and middle easterners. And of course they scam the system wherever possible, they don't give a shit, they are not thankful, if they are smart they think we are idiots and if they are dumb they think it's a gift from allah. If they open businesses and they don't pay taxes or ignore hygiene or work safety rules, you know what happens? The state sends a strongly worded letter, because at so many points the assumption is that you mean well and were just misinformed and want to follow the rules. But the sandniggers open businesses to scam customers or business loans or whatever you can get and as soon as it gets too bad with impending lawsuits etc they just abandon it wholesale. Some go back to their shitholes, some just assume another identity and reregister as refugees or go to the next shitlib country that gives them welfare.
 
From this documentary, I'm convinced that the British did nothing wrong during colonial times. A while ago I was reluctant to believe the burning widows story, only because I was taught that colonial accounts were lies.

But now I think the British’s accounts were far more accurate than I thought. Everything they've accused Indian men of being during those times is proven true.

It's no wonder the women seek out western men as soon as they move out to the west, and why its Indian men who bitch the most about “muh colonialism”.
 
But now I think the British’s accounts were far more accurate than I thought. Everything they've accused Indian men of being during those times is proven true.

It's no wonder the women seek out western men as soon as they move out to the west, and why its Indian men who bitch the most about “muh colonialism”.

Third world females dream about being bleached for a reason, White men are actually respectful and honorable people. Unfortunately some White men fall for the trickery of non-white women despite the fact race mixing is wrong and immoral.
 
Also, is Tulsi Gabbards a pajeeta?
She is mixed European/Pacific Islander.
It's not Indians where I'm at, at least not many, it's mostly africans and middle easterners.
It already applies to people like Balkanites, outsiders generally treat Western countries as shopping malls/casinos where you consoom, get rich quick and then fuck off.
 
The US has the EB-1 visa, commonly known as the "Einstein Visa", which is designed to let in only the top 0.01% of a field.
Here are the requirements for straight from United States Customs and Immigration Services (archive):

Criteria for Demonstrating Extraordinary Ability​

In order to demonstrate you have sustained national or international acclaim and that your achievements have been recognized in your field of expertise, you must either include evidence of a one-time achievement (major internationally-recognized award) or 3 of the 10 listed criteria below (or comparable evidence if any of the criteria do not readily apply):
  • Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
  • Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members
  • Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media
  • Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel
  • Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field
  • Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
  • Evidence that your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
  • Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations
  • Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
  • Evidence of your commercial successes in the performing arts

Examples of Documentary Evidence That a Person is an Outstanding Professor or Researcher​

In order to demonstrate you are an outstanding professor or researcher, you must include evidence of 2 of the 6 listed criteria below (or comparable evidence if any of the criteria do not readily apply):
  • Evidence of receipt of major prizes or awards for outstanding achievement
  • Evidence of membership in associations that require their members to demonstrate outstanding achievement
  • Evidence of published material in professional publications written by others about the noncitizen's work in the academic field
  • Evidence of participation, either on a panel or individually, as a judge of the work of others in the same or allied academic field
  • Evidence of original scientific or scholarly research contributions in the field
  • Evidence of authorship of scholarly books or articles (in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the field

Certain Multinational manager or executive​

Your petitioning employer must be a U.S. employer and intend to employ you in a managerial or executive capacity. The petitioner must have been doing business in the U.S. for at least 1 year, as a legal entity with a qualifying relationship to the entity that employed you abroad in a managerial or executive capacity.
No labor certification is required.

Sounds like you need to be either an executive of a major company, Nobel Laureate, a Fields Medalist, an Olympian, etc. to be admitted right? Maybe a pro athlete or a top researcher/specialist with decades of experience could be admitted as well.

Well, if you're Indian, the bar for being in the top 0.01% is a lot, lot lower:

I don’t think I meet any of these. How can I change that?​

Don’t fret. Most applicants go out and do things specifically so they can get evidence to meet these criteria. In my experience, there are people with barely any evidence for 3 categories who get approved on the first try and others with tremendous evidence and a long history of success who take multiple attempts to get approved. Ultimately, the decision is made by a single officer within 10-15 minutes and is not reproducible, just like admissions into a college. That officer has little to no understanding of what consitutes “impressive” or meaningful in your field. They just read your application and attempt to insurance that it meets a legal definition.

Here are some things you can do to build your profile for an EB-1A:

Just claim that reviewing open source code, administering an adult hackathon, or handing out some meaningless awards to YouTubers makes you a judge of a nationally recognized competition:

Judging
  • You can simply go online and apply to be a judge in the following awards. They’re pretty pointless awards but they help strengthen your app. While I was applying to these, I found so many of my friends’ profiles on these websites and realized that they did it for their EB-1! These award programs typically have one of their many categories active at different times of the year. I would estimate ~3 months to register, be accepted, judge ~50 submisions and get a public or private certificate.
  • You can use code reviews of popular open source repositories as “reviewing the work of others”.
  • You can use judging hackathons here, as long as they’re not student events.

Don't make more than what 90% of the people in your field do? Just claim that you're actually in some lower paid field or that the equity in your startup is worth millions:

High Salary
  • Your salary + equity has to be above 90% for your job code. You can check at OneStop and the BLS website. You can find a suitable job title to make your case stronger. For example, if 15-1252 Software Developers shows too high a salary for you, you can always try 15-1251 Computer Programmers or any of the other Category 15 Job Codes.
  • Venture funding can count towards high salary and USCIS says so too.
  • For entrepreneurs or founders of startup businesses, officers consider evidence that the business has received significant funding from government entities, venture capital funds, angel investors, or other such funders in evaluating the credibility of submitted contracts, job offer letters, or other evidence of prospective salary or remuneration for services.”
  • You can use equity according to the USCIS too.
  • As another example, if the petitioner demonstrates that receipt of a high salary is not readily applicable to the person’s position as an entrepreneur, the petitioner might present evidence that the person’s highly valued equity holdings in the startup are of comparable significance to the high salary criterion.

Get your friends to claim that you're in a critical role at work. Don't have any? Just found your own company and claim whatever you want!

Leading / Critical Role
  • This is pretty easy to prove through letters from people who are familiar with your work. Many jobs can count towards this, including
    • Senior research position at academic or non academic institutions
    • Founder / cofounder of startup with distinguished reputation
    • Leading / critical role of a distinguished organization, as explained by a letter from a director / principal investigator of the org.
  • Well-funded startups count as distinguished reputation
  • The letter should contain
    • Intro and background of author
    • About the company and its own accomplishments
    • Description of your leading role
    • Description of your critical role
    • How your work impacts the company as a whole
    • Why the petitioner is “top” of their field
  • When getting letters, I would draft the letters myself and ask them to sign it. Most expert reviewers do not have the time or knowledge to draft a useful letter.

Need to show that you're innovative? Just file a patent. The patent doesn't even have to be granted!

Original Contributions
  • Patents help here — both pending or granted!
  • Published and cited research can also help here
  • Proof that the product you’ve built is commercially used widely.
  • Can use published material about the significance of your work.
  • Letters from experts talking about the nature and significance of your contribution, with info about the author’s expertise.

Can't get your work published in a scientific journal? Just publish in a pay-to-play one or give a speech to no one at a conference!

Scholarly Articles

Sign up for "prestigious" organizations:

Membership in Associations
  • IADAS (International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences) is trivial to apply to and get membership in, but is a well-recognized association that meets the EB-1 criteria. You can get this as a part of the Webby Awards which is used for Judging.
  • The criteria for this is open to interpretation. The USCIS uses this example as sufficient:
    may include membership as a fellow in a scientific society dedicated to artificial intelligence if the membership is based on recognition of a nominee’s significant, sustained contributions to the field of artificial intelligence, and a panel of current fellows makes the selection of new fellows.
  • You should be able to use Y Combinator, certain “hacker” group memberships, company memberships and more.
  • You can try to become a member of various open source organizations based on the merit of your contributions.

Write a blog or get your friends to write stuff about you. The law says that published material must exist about you, not that its actually read by anyone:

Published Material
  • You can use Trade Press Services, as mentioned above in “Scholarly Articles”, to aim to get articles written not just by you, but about you.
  • You can appear on podcasts, try to work with media organizations to get them to write about you, or be written about in a book.
  • Being written about even on tech blogs and several lesser known online articles can help, but you will have to cite readership numbers.

Winning a Nobel Prize is too hard? Just claim that your local hackathon's prize is equivalent!

Awards
  • While many think this award has to be of “Nobel Prize” level, it does not according to USCIS themselves:
    however, there is no specific requirement that an award be open to all members of the field, including the most experienced, in order to meet the requirements of this criterion. While limitations on competitors can be a relevant factor, in some instances the evidence may establish that an award or prize is nationally or internationally recognized despite being limited to youth, amateur competitors, or early-career professionals.” as well as “an award available only to persons within a single locality, employer, or school may have little national or international recognition, while an award open to members of a well-known national institution (including an R1 or R2 doctoral university) or professional organization may be nationally recognized.
  • You can count certain kinds of funding or membership to startup incubators like Y Combinator and South Park Commons as “awards”.
  • You can definitely use winning hackathons as an award, so long as they’re not “student” hackathons. Here’s a person who did that.

The author brags about getting an EB-1 despite not qualifying for one and lists other Indians who've publicly claimed to have gotten one:
You’re not a “Nobel” prize winner and don’t have the “Extraordinary Ability” to deserve an EB-1A — many people who have successfully gotten an EB-1A, including me, are nowhere close to a “Nobel” prize. The USCIS says the EB-1A requires:
a level of expertise indicating that the individual is one of that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor
Remember, an EB-1A at the end of the day is an objective legal judgment on whether you fulfil a set of requirements — “small” and “top” and “field of endeavor” are not clearly delineated concepts here. Take a look at the credentials of certain people who have been approved for an EB-1A to benchmark yourself:
None of them should have qualified for the visa. Data analysts, product/program managers, and low-level engineers are not who this visa is supposed to apply to. I also love how the author acknowledges that the "director" of business intelligence has an embellished title (in reality he's a data analyst).

The whole guide (archive) is insane and shows how little these people care about following the spirit of our laws and respecting our culture.
 
Last edited:
For some reason, criticism of Indians on 4chan is censored. You can talk about any religion, culture or ethnicity, except for Indians, that will get you banned. Some suspect that 4chan has an Indian janitor problem. According to an Indian poster, there are Discord servers where poos will raid threads they don't like by mass reporting and spamming.

A poll taken by 4chan users indicates that 82% want India to be rangebanned from the site.
1708398260538309.jpg Untitledf.png 1708398307976635.jpg1708405366578282.jpg 1708398322216162.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back