Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 14.1%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.6%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 159 34.0%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 114 24.4%

  • Total voters
    468
Out of curiosity, you said on the KiwiFarmsDotNet Xitter account that FIRE refused to help you. Did they just ignore your messages when you tried to reach out or did they just tell you to go fuck yourself?
ACLU and FIRE both ignored. I've emailed EFF a few incredibly bitter messages calling them faggots and have received "Thank you for bringing this to our attention" emails.

By" and Kiwi Farms, a website" does he mean Lolcow LLC, or us, the users of the site? I'm actually curious because of the wording.
GOOD FUCKING QUESTION ASK RUSSELL GREER. NOBODY KNOWS. IT'S IN OUR FILINGS.
 
There is a singular typo... i think it's over........
1709253365133.png

By" and Kiwi Farms, a website" does he mean Lolcow LLC, or us, the users of the site? I'm actually curious because of the wording.
I think it's just the way Greer did it originally. It is likely nonsense and there were motions to handle that, sadly Russ has not responded yet. E: dammit, sniped. shouldn't have gone looking for the reference.
 
Oral arguments are broadcast in audio form only. But if this actually happened, people like Alex Caraballo would show up to take pictures and harass Josh.
Remember the legal fund: K-farmers® Defense Force will turn up, both volunteer & paid mall cops. Imagine the black shades and tie saying "Twinkletard for five-hunnid says 'back the fuck up, tranny.'"
 
I have a retarded question.

Why are the margins on legal documents so fucking huge? You can barely fit 5 words on one line, why not use the other 50% of the page?
The Supreme Court requires special formatting with even larger margins.


Official decisions are issued on small-sized paper. I still have one of the first 50 of the Bush v. Gore decision that ended the recounts and gave Bush the 2000 election that was rushed out the printroom door for TV producers before it was cut down to size. Never happened before in the history of the court.
 
Last edited:
I have a retarded question.

Why are the margins on legal documents so fucking huge? You can barely fit 5 words on one line, why not use the other 50% of the page?
Probably required because boomers keep them in old fucking ass binders that would punch holes in the actual text had it been formatted improperly.
 
If anything it's good. More publicity the better. The more noise there is, the more the Justices might be interested in it at all.
It's still aggravating when you can soothsay what the lies about us will be before those who say them have even thought of them. Or heard of us, for that matter.
 
I have a retarded question.

Why are the margins on legal documents so fucking huge? You can barely fit 5 words on one line, why not use the other 50% of the page?
SCOTUS is incredibly persnickety about this and has very strict rules. This is how these petitions are formatted unless you want them instantly thrown in the trash.
 
Probably required because boomers keep them in old fucking ass binders that would punch holes in the actual text had it been formatted improperly.
Federal courts still have fax machines, so you could be right. The Supreme Court does have its whole unique citation and formatting styles, and they're not shy about saying your petition fucked up some obscure requirement, before anyone with legal training actually reads a word of it.

Anyways, here's the judicial rule of the Supreme Court that directs how the justices are supposed to consider petitions:

Review on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. A petition for a writ of certiorari will be granted only for compelling reasons. The following, although neither controlling nor fully measuring the Court's discretion, indicate the character of the reasons the Court considers:
  • (a) a United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matter; has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by a state court of last resort; or has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power;
  • (b) a state court of last resort has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the decision of another state court of last resort or of a United States court of appeals;
  • (c) a state court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court.
A petition for a writ of certiorari is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of erroneous factual findings or the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law.
 
It's still aggravating when you can soothsay what the lies about us will be before those who say them have even thought of them. Or heard of us, for that matter.
I mean our chance of this going through are at 1% as is. Their lies can do precious little to affect our success and might even rebound and make some of the justices raise a eyebrow or two. I'm actually excited. Especially if they have to eat those lies.
 
I mean our chance of this going through are at 1% as is. Their lies can do precious little to affect our success and might even rebound and make some of the justices raise a eyebrow or two. I'm actually excited. Especially if they have to eat those lies.
They'd be shrieking at Based Uncle Clarence for defending an "extremist forum", more so than they already do.
 
Back