- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Oh no. Anything but that. I don't think he cares after ripping Row V Wade to piecesThey'd be shrieking at Based Uncle Clarence for defending an "extremist forum", more so than they already do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh no. Anything but that. I don't think he cares after ripping Row V Wade to piecesThey'd be shrieking at Based Uncle Clarence for defending an "extremist forum", more so than they already do.
who knows. it seems like there aren't any actual rules for anything with this case.Could the Supreme Court remand this back down to the Appellate Court and tell them, "Fix this, retards"?
Even if he goes down in flames, he will have made his bones. Will be able to say he fully briefed and argued a Supreme Court case. Considering he stuck his neck out for you even during drop kiwi farms, bro deserves the honor of carrying the flag if he wants it IMO.I'm going to put Hardin and his friend up for it if it comes to that. If they fuck it up and make fair use a death penalty, blame the EFF, I asked them for help first.
Crazy how the www is, what, 33 years old now? and that question isn't completely set in stone legally. How was this not established completely unambiguously by like 1992?3. Whether the posting of a link to copyrighted material saved at a third-party storage provider is the same as posting the infringing material itself.
I guess you've probably scraped the bottom of the barrel looking around different orgs already, but have you tried reaching out to the public knowledge foundation?ACLU and FIRE both ignored. I've emailed EFF a few incredibly bitter messages
https://publicknowledge.org/issue/copyright-reform/Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.
This case sounds right up their street. FYI Brewster Kahle (Internet Archive guy) is on their board of directors but it might still be worth a shot?Copyright law has grown into a clunky, convoluted system that prevents people without legal training from understanding what they can and can’t create or share. This gives corporate rightsholders the power to slap online creators with takedown notices courtesy of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
I was wondering what he was talking about on Sean's podcast.
SCOTUS is not Woke America. That said they'll probably not grant it. It just doesn't happen. Often.
The very possibility of a Supreme Court case involving the Farms is hilarious though.
And it would not be unique for an utterly reviled entity to be in a SCOTUS case. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby anyone? (That was cited by Randazza in the oral arguments in Rekieta's appellate case yesterday.)
Oooooo this is a bold and ambitious move. I honestly hope this doesn't backfire on you nor the Internet at large, Josh. Nothing ventured, nothing gained, but I don't think anyone expected this large of a move.Josh has petitioned SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari over the appellate decision.
View attachment 5769640View attachment 5769641View attachment 5769643View attachment 5769644View attachment 5769645View attachment 5769646View attachment 5769648View attachment 5769649View attachment 5769650View attachment 5769652View attachment 5769653View attachment 5769654View attachment 5769656View attachment 5769657View attachment 5769658View attachment 5769659View attachment 5769660View attachment 5769661View attachment 5769662View attachment 5769663View attachment 5769665View attachment 5769666View attachment 5769667View attachment 5769668View attachment 5769669View attachment 5769670View attachment 5769671View attachment 5769672View attachment 5769673View attachment 5769674View attachment 5769675View attachment 5769676View attachment 5769677View attachment 5769678View attachment 5769679View attachment 5769680View attachment 5769681View attachment 5769682View attachment 5769683View attachment 5769684View attachment 5769685View attachment 5769686View attachment 5769687
By" and Kiwi Farms, a website" does he mean Lolcow LLC, or us, the users of the site? I'm actually curious because of the wording.
is he the guy related to Taylor Lorenz that censored the archive for her and got us blacklisted?FYI Brewster Kahle (Internet Archive guy)
Lolcow LLC is d/b/a Kiwi Farms in WV, however Russell Greer was too stupid to name the company. I reiterate, read the filings, this is a pending question we're waiting Greer to answer. If you're going to try and claim I'm lying about what's being filed, read what was actually filed prior in District.It does not appear that Lolcow LLC is a party to the proceedings at all.
I mean if we are to take this literally, he is suing Kiwi Farms, which is a site on a server rack. He is suing fucking hardware.is he the guy related to Taylor Lorenz that censored the archive for her and got us blacklisted?
Lolcow LLC is d/b/a Kiwi Farms in WV, however Russell Greer was too stupid to name the company. I reiterate, read the filings, this is a pending question we're waiting Greer to answer. If you're going to try and claim I'm lying about what's being filed, read what was actually filed prior in District.
According to the petition that’s what they’re asking for OR hear it in full court in front of the Supremes.Could the Supreme Court remand this back down to the Appellate Court and tell them, "Fix this, retards"?
They also may want to revisit the Napster decision considering the tenth circuit taking that and massively broadening the nature of copyright liability to implicating a URL. That is a huge problem for everyone. Be they Google or an Autistic little gossip forum.But in that case you might as well face the wormy ball; so it might come down to if Roberts wants to solidify free speech…
He's the founder of the IA, I can't remember whether it's known if he personally authorised the blacklisting, but he's since disputed that he's related to Lorenz https://archive.is/HdIhBis he the guy related to Taylor Lorenz that censored the archive for her and got us blacklisted?
He's only one board member though, so it might not make much difference unless he actually did have a huge personal grudge against KF.Taylor Lorenz is not my niece, nor have I met her.