The Coyote Vs. Acme film is being deleted and while on principle I feel that the idea a company can shelve an entire completed movie for a tax write off is pretty lousy, but my faint interest in seeing what the film was all about died off as soon as I saw that it looked like another Tom & Jerry 2020-type of CG slop ordeal, another re-re-re-re-re-re-rehash of Roger Rabbit, but where Roger Rabbit was one of several major events that lead up to the "90s Renaissance" in animation, have any of the live-action/cartoon hybrid films really done anything for animation?
Did people including studios start "respecting animation" and realizing "Animation Is Cinema" because of Space Jam 2, or Rocky & Bullwinkle, or that terrible film where Russell Brand voiced the son of the Easter Bunny, and so on. These movies reduce animation to a gimmick and are mostly written and created and shepherded by people who don't care about animation, asides from trying to sell marketable IPs. Ralph Bakshi tried to make a live-action/cartoon hybrid for adults with Cool World, that explored a creator vs. creation narrative and he was totally ratfucked by Paramount. Bakshi approached the idea of a live action-animation hybrid from the view of an animator and filmmaker, which what most of these people who make movies like the Tom & Jerry movie and so on don't. in their lizard brains, Roger Rabbit was a huge hit (36 years ago, but still) and they just want to recreate that success.
I also can't get upset about Coyote vs. Acme because the premise is based in that 1990s proto-TVTropes referential meta-humor which non-cartoonists who wrote cartoons were using after Roger Rabbit. I suppose you might have been psyched for this film if you were looking forward to jokes about how cartoon "tropes" are silly and unrealistic.