Im late to the tank sperging, but I want to throw my observations in because I've been seeing a lot of cope on X about the wunderwaffen Abrams getting destroyed.
It reminds me of how Hamas took out a few Merkavas. Those are supposed to be one of the safest tanks for the crew and very well protected against most threats but some well placed anti-tank missiles and drone attacks took them out. I have no idea how the crew fared in those attacks.
This is something I see a lot, and really just speaks to normal peoples ignorance of the Tank. Despite popular belief, armor and ERA and its kin are the absolute last ditch effort to protect the vehicle, not the main line. In arms races, armor is always going to be a generation behind, just because its far easier to put holes in things than it is to make them impregnable. As a result, a lot of protective focus has moved towards making a mission kill survivable for the crew - We've hit the upper limit of what we can reasonably do with current materials to stop shells entirely, so all we can do now is reduce how many tankers get pasted when we're not good enough. Everything else has been focused into screening, awareness, etc to make it less likely you get surprised by light infantry with RPG's - Can't get shot in the ass if you spot and retaliate against light infantry before they get the angle.
However, this contrasts with the Normie perception of the tank, which is an impenetrable bulwark of steel that cannot be stopped. To normal folks, a tank that can have a hole put in it is a shitty tank. Video games and popular media have made this worse, with tanks eating RPG's and being "ok" or bouncing shot after shot after shot (Lol not against modern weapons, that's for sure). The Gulf wars made this even worse, with the Abrams trading extremely favorably against shitty outdated tanks with untrained crews. But now they're facing comparatively modern vehicles, with reasonably trained crews, firing modern ammunitions. The myth of Abrams invulnerability was spread so hard and held onto so desperately, with people coping in prior losses about crew kill vs mission kill (Which doesn't fucking matter, a dismounted tank crew cannot perform the job of a tank, its good their alive but that operation is still in jeopardy) to hold onto the myth.
The Abrams has pretty good crew preservation techniques, and in its Depleted Uranium armored state, is right up near the edge of what we can do material science wise. The export models, lacking said uranium, fall short of that, but the overall armor scheme is still sound, if now a bit overwrought and underdelivered for the cost. But even Depleted Uranium isn't impregnable.
Anyone with a modicum of knowledge knew that these tanks would get fucked up just as much as Russia's fancy next generation tanks would, because Tanks are merely rolling direct fire artillery platforms, not iron fortresses. The coping and seething is just normies catching up to another reality of warfare.