Trashfire WPATH Medical Documents Leak

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I think these individuals represented the tiny fraction of intersex or truly trans people.
All I mean is that an adult that isn’t mentally ill or challenged can get surgery. You don’t have to treat them as the other sex, but it is their (bad) decision.
Boy, you're a mixed bag, aintchya? I disagreed with the "truly trans" statement, but stayed for the "mentally competent adults should be able to get whatever cosmetic surgery" statement.

I used to think "truly trans" existed, because I've known transfolk IRL that don't hurt nobody and keep their cocksucking lips shut. I wanted to give preference to these people that simply want to exist. But if I can think a "truly trans" 25 year old man can exist, occasionally retweeting an AssignedMale webcomic, who am I to deny that status to a 14 year old girl that got fingered by her touchy uncle and is desperate to not be seen as a sex object? Is she also "truly" a transman?

No. She is a victim of sexual assault and seeking the wrong avenue to deal with her trauma. There are no "truly trans" people. There are people with psych issues that pass as mentally sound and people with psych issues that obviously need stewardship (from someone without Munchausen's-by-Proxy). I will restate it in bold, there are no "truly trans" people. The criteria to sort them is compromised, so I (and most onlookers) will not be an impartial judge. Adults should be able to pay for their own cosmetic surgeries from their pockets, but until "trans kids" are not the focus of the debate (and until we're classifying gender reassignment as "cosmetic" care rather than "life-saving" care), you can count a reasonable red-blooded American like me among the enemies of this shit.
 
Screen Shot 2024-03-06 at 8.45.35 PM.png

J.K. Rowling has promoted the files! This is especially helpful as her recent controversy has garnered her some more attention.

Less fun, but amusing:
Screen Shot 2024-03-06 at 8.34.56 PM.png

Spoiler alert: the entire thread, and I mean this without hyperbole, is just them looking into the people who wrote the paper and offering no commentary on the document whatsoever. The conclusion is that the writers were funded by right-wing extremists so none of it can be trusted. Fucking amazing.

One thing that makes my blood boil is how people continue to eat up these "fact checks." Whoever predicted that Erin Reed's document would be used blindly as a debunking wherever the files were posted was correct, unfortunately, I see it everywhere now.

I'm going to stop checking Xitter for responses, its eating into my free time and I never walk away happy. I hope some others can continue to provide updates on the growing publicity of the WPATH files.

I, personally, hope to hear of a response from jammidodger. I used to watch him when I knew less about this shitshow.
 
The outcomes for SRS are almost universally catastrophic and permanent. People should be allowed to do what they want as long as it is only to themselves, but there also comes a point to where people or authorities should intervene when it comes to somebody who is mentally-ill.

No ethical physician would agree to perform gastric bypass surgery on an anorexic, just as no surgeon should prescribe HRT and SRS for people who are clearly delusional and the latter should be banned because of how poor the results are. Gender dysphoria is a mental illness, and should be treated as such, not with surgery and HRT, and true gender dysphoria is extremely rare. Most of these troons/pooners either have depression or self-esteem issues or are doing it out of some strange fetish.
 
Last edited:
Appreciate the input. But I lean pretty far on the principle of autonomy, so if someone decides, and is an adult without disability or serious health issues, and knows, let them do it. Freedom means freedom to make mistakes too. People can’t change biology, true, but ultimately it is their body.
This is the mindset that needs to be beaten and hacked to death with a rusty machete if we ever want to make any kind of positive change in our culture. This is the mindset of Satanists and libertarians, and, in my humble opinion, is directly responsible for the vast majority of ills in our society today, including transgenderism.

I used to be like you, the libertarian hippy-dippy "just let people do what they want, maaaaan." Over the years I've realized just how asinine and braindead it is. Let me just touch on two points.

First off, the entire principle of "informed consent" is inherently flawed. How does anybody know what's good for them or not? How can somebody have access to all of the knowledge required to consent to something? What about the people who are being lied to and don't realize it? What about people who are informed, who know what they're doing is bad, and yet proceed to do it anyway? Nobody can possibly be aware of all of the ramifications of their actions. Every single one of us does things that, in our minds, seems well-reasoned and informed, and yet it blows up spectacularly in our faces. None of us have a crystal ball to see into the future with, none of us can ever be truly informed on our decisions and actions. This isn't to say that we should have no freedom, or to say we should live in a nanny state where Big Brother makes all of our decisions for us, but it is merely to demonstrate that "informed consent" cannot be the baseline for all of our decision making. "Informed consent" is a mirage. It doesn't really exist.

Secondly, bodily autonomy is also false. Your choices are not made in a vacuum. Even choices that ostensibly only have to deal with you can have far-reaching effects on those around you. Think about how many things we ban that would absolutely fly in the face of "bodily autonomy." Take suicide as an example. Suicide, by all accounts, would be the perfect expression of bodily autonomy. It's my body, and I wish to kill myself, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do that? Why does anybody else have the right to intervene and prevent my suicide attempt? Wouldn't that be infringing on my bodily autonomy? Yes, it absolutely would, but it's because suicide does not just affect me.

Me, personally, if I were to off myself, the effects would be devastating. My mother and father would never get over it. My mother would probably cry herself to sleep every night if I blew my brains out, and my father? My father would probably follow right behind me and off himself if I were to ever do it. My siblings would also have to deal with my self-deletion, and they would be impacted by it, which in turn would also affect all of their relationships. How would my brother's marriage turn out if my brother had to deal with the trauma of his older brother offing himself? How would my sister-in-law deal with that? What about my niece? All of those connections to me, severed by my suicide, and that unfathomably dark event would make waves like a boulder tossed into a tranquil river, disrupting everything around it.

Even if you don't have immediate family or friends, think about the people who have to witness your suicide. I've seen testimonies from first-responders, having to be the first ones on the scene for a person's suicide. They have to be the ones to see your pale, lifeless body hanging from the ceiling, or clean up the blood and bones from the wall from where you shot yourself, or however the method may be. That shit scars people for life. These strangers, people you never even knew, being profoundly affected by your choice. Some of them even go on to commit suicide themselves, because the trauma and depression you get from seeing that shit multiple times takes its toll on you.

All of this because someone decided to exercise their "bodily autonomy" and off themselves.

Think about other things besides suicide. Think about drugs. Drugs are another area where people - libertarians especially - will argue "bodily autonomy." It's my body, and if I want to do drugs in the privacy of my own home, why shouldn't I be allowed? Because again, it fucks up the people around you. Your friends and family have to sit back and watch you destroy yourself with drugs. You become a toxic element in all of your relationships. People no longer want to deal with you because you're high all the time. The drugs slowly poison your body and ruin your mind, and next thing you know you're a homeless person, terrorizing innocent people on the streets because you couldn't control yourself and made bad decisions.

Now think of transgenderism. You might want to modify your body in that way, but again, the people around you are hurt by it. Your parents have to watch their son mutilate himself, cut off his bloodline, and cross-dress because he's mentally ill and refuses to seek help. Think of all the trans-widows, whose marriages were selfishly and callously destroyed because their husbands wanted to put on skirts and LARP as women. I recall in the tranny L's thread, a tranny lamenting that his son decided to refer to his tranny dad as his "self mutilated not male y chromosome progenitor." Such is the level of hatred the son had for his father, a hatred born entirely out of dad's selfish desire to troon out.

There are many examples of laws against bodily autonomy, because the truth is this: it's not your body. What I mean by that is that you do not have ownership over it. You did not create it, you did not choose to live, you were made by forces outside of your control. At best your body is under lease; you are given temporary control over it in exchange for certain provisions. Those provisions include - but are not limited to - agreements to not commit crime, to not harm others, to not destroy yourself, to not be a nuisance to society, and other such stipulations. The lease can be rescinded if you violate the terms, as you will be thrown in jail, and eventually, even if you don't violate the terms, you will die eventually, and then the lease is up anyway.

You do not have the right to radically alter your body in such a way. You simply do not. It is delusional, it is insane, it is madness, and it is evil. You absolutely do not have the right to behave in such a way. Fuck your bodily autonomy, and fuck your "informed consent." Both concepts need to be chucked in the bin with the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny as the myths they are.
 
Last edited:
I wanted to give preference to these people that simply want to exist.
I'm with you in that, there was a time where I thought there were perfectly okay transes.

But you know something? I'm fucking exhausted with the kind of people who tell conservatives they have to police their own (one Nazi at a table of ten and no one does anything about the Nazi means you have ten Nazis, dumb bullshit though it is), but their fucking jokers get to run wild and free and for fuck's sake molesting kids.

No trans person gets a pass until they start standing up and denouncing the everloving fuck out of their numbers that can't keep their hands off other people's kids.

Also that their perception of reality is not a demand that they get to make on other people (as such, projecting onto kids).

In other words, full-scale acknowledgement that they have a disease that they are fully prohibited from making anyone else's problem. You think someone's kid is trans? None of your fucking business. You think I should acknowledge your pronouns? The fuck I have to. You have a male body and you think that because you say you're female, you get access to women's spaces? I should be allowed to call the police on your degenerate ass. Arguing that I don't acknowledge that you exist? Take your fatuous, fallacious arguments somewhere else; your argument is histrionic and requires many leaps of logic that are all made in bad faith.
 
@Irish Potato Farmer I guess what I mean is that a mentally healthy trans person who understands the risks would be really fucking rare. Perhaps nonexistent, so what to do for the best would be to improve mental health otherwise. If the circumstances and society change, and they still exist, we can discuss.
I don't mean to lay the hammer on you here, you seem like a reasonable sort from that demographic. It's just... this is the one website where you can see the emperor has no clothes, and you can call it out. You can actually speak the internal "wrongthink" here.

I am a Libertarian. I've voted gold in the countless midterms and generals in my adulthood. I believe "live and let live" and that "gay married couples should be able to protect their marijuana crop with fully automatic "assault" rifles with supressors", but "trans rights" crap sets me off so hard.

What "rights" are they being denied? The ability to transfer the cost of their completely-elective medical care to the taxpayer? The ability to nab gold medals from womens' sporting competitions? The ability to groom your children to take the shortest route to success and media acknowledgement/sympathy? I'm just so fucking done with it. These people are dangerous, they're suckling on my tax-paying teat and you're implicitly making excuses for some of them.
 
Last edited:
J.K. Rowling has promoted the files! This is especially helpful as her recent controversy has garnered her some more attention.
...and Rowling Derangement Syndrome has just shifted into maximum overdrive.
What "rights" are they being denied?
They're being denied the "right" to force other people to play into their delusions under penalty of law. You see right now in America it's very possible another person can intentionally not "respect" their pronouns and they can't be sent to jail for doing so...that's literally genociding trans people!!!
 
Horrifying thought:

>Go to hospital for life-saving surgery
>Member of medical staff doesn't like you
>Goes into your medical files
>Changes your upcoming surgery to include or be replaced by sex change
>Act of spite
>Wake up in hospital bed
>Notice severe pain in crotch
>Feel around to find stink ditch / necrotic mushroom
>Yell at medical staff
>"It clearly says here you wanted the sex change"
>"Oopsie doodle, we made a fucky wucky, pwease no sue, uWu"
Happy ending thought:

> Member of the medical staff who doesn't like you happens to be a sib of one of your past patients
> You used to be a doctor
> You were one of the doctors in the WPATH files
> You spend the next couple of decades coping, seething, and dilating, EVERY DAMN DAY FOR HOURS.
> You never, ever pass.
 
I used to be like you, the libertarian hippy-dippy "just let people do what they want, maaaaan." Over the years I've realized just how asinine and braindead it is. Let me just touch on two points.

This is simply beautiful, and illustrates so well why I gave up on lolbertarianism as well.
 
But I lean pretty far on the principle of autonomy, so if someone decides, and is an adult without disability or serious health issues, and knows, let them do it.
I’m all for bodily autonomy. This isnt bodily autonomy. Bodily autonomy is stuff like : I will not take a vaccine, I have control over my diet. I will not be forced to donate blood or organs. I will not be married off to someone I don’t want to be married to. It’s self contained. It requires nothing from others.
Trans surgeries require the input of others. If you’re operating on your own body, that’s up to you. But you aren’t. You demand the existence of surgeons who will operate, and that requires surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, hospitals, resources that in publically funded countries are very limited and should go to those that need not want. You also require society as a whole to allow it because otherwise there’s no surgery. The same applies for drugs and hormones - it requires a whole societal apparatus and approval from society. That’s NOT bodily autonomy, it’s changing and demanding from society.
You know it doesn’t help. You’ve managed to get out of it, thank goodness and I hope your life improves. But the only acceptable number of trans surgeries is nil. The very idea should horrify society, and if we allow any, we have to have the whole sordid apparatus of transition to exists.
 
You also require society as a whole to allow it because otherwise there’s no surgery. The same applies for drugs and hormones - it requires a whole societal apparatus and approval from society. That’s NOT bodily autonomy, it’s changing and demanding from society.
This is an issue with trying to apply the harm principle to such a socially subversive concept like trooning out, that to exist requires normalization. The entire trans thing started out like this anyways, it was just adults doing pretty degenerate shit, and defending it by saying they aren't harming anyone else. Maybe it was hard to see the slippery slope in foresight then, I don't know, I wasn't around when fags were doing that stone wall bullshit.

I don't like to be defeatist, but I really don't know what to do anymore. Though, it really is starting to look like people are slowly waking up, and this entire super progressive whatever-the-fuck movement is starting to implode, bit by bit. Hope that's not just me being optimistic though.
 
I studied German history, and there was nascent trans research and an LGB community in Berlin between the wars. There were a few dozen people who got trans treatment at that time- literally the most experimental there could be. Think literal one in a million people, that rare. They knew the astronomical risks, that they would be outcasts, that Hitler hated them. And still they did it. I think these individuals represented the tiny fraction of intersex or truly trans people. They were issued special papers and ID that acknowledged they hadn’t and couldn’t change sex, but were profoundly different people, and the idea was to keep them from being shot or beaten on the street by treating them as sort of gender “exceptions.”

This is fucking horseshit and you know it.

I don't care if they didn't think they could actually change sex, they were absolutely fucking retarded to do it, especially that one autogynephile who underwent a womb transplant. He absolutely deserves to be laughed at for self-deleting himself in such a way.

It was completely unnecessary, and it was mad scientist fuckery. If they knew they couldn't change sex, why didn't they just throw their hands up and accept what's between their legs? Why?

"Fun" fact, many of the doctors involved went on to perform horrific experiments on people in death camps during the Holocaust.

If you actually studied German history, you'd also realize that the Weimar Republic was horrifically corrupt, and it openly prided itself on being libertine to the point of insanity. The fact that the Weimar government actively facilitated such depravity was one of the factors that made people desperate enough to elect an extremist political group to power (yes, the nazis were considered a fringe extremist group during the 1920s in Germany).

If liberals were truly worried about nazis coming back, they'd do the smart thing and take the trash out. Before people become desperate enough, and radicalized enough, to elect madmen who will take out plenty of innocent people ALONGSIDE the trash.
 
Last edited:
Back