Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

[Stan]

Mentioning the Jews is exactly that, a tactic to associate all criticism with anti-Semitism and to dismiss it as bigoted.

I'm doing it because the chimps did it first and I think it's silly and ridiculous. This whole conspiracy that the feminists/SJWs/Deep State is coming to forcibly feminize the video games is just mindblowingly silly to me. If you want I can swap out Jews for lizard people, and the joke still works.

Are there some cringe trannies on the fringe making cringe games? Yes. But there's a lot of cringe and dross games out there made by straight guys/boys. @Lowtax did a whole channel doing Let's Plays of these pieces of crap. Why do you think that cringe is somehow only found in games made by/for women, gays, troons and what have you? and why are you moids so threatened by the idea of troons chilling in the NEET lair playing Dream Daddy or Ladykiller in a Bind, or whatever?? Give the troons their stupid indie games! The poor things don't even have penises anymore.

As for the wokeness coming from the top: why do the moids think they are the OG and only market AAA wants to cater to? Why are you boys pissing yourselves because corporate AAA studios might put some content in the game meant to appeal to a player other than yourself? Is it really so hard to comprehend that if a certain game takes idk, ~$5 million to make, that the people at the top (distributors, executive producers, etc.) would want to hedge their bets to try and get the game to appeal to the widest audience possible? Why is this difficult for you to understand, AP?

What strikes me here is the selfishness. Like in OG Gamergate, you spuds think that you are the OG, only and forever market for games. I'm sorry guys, but that's not true.

So Marge, why should "the chuds", who enjoyed positive representation, should just be OK with these changes? Why should the chuds not fight back and refuse to relinquish any of their social capital?

I think a better question is "Why is it so threatening to these apes if someone makes a game for an audience that isn't them?" Seriously, why do they care? I don't care when Rammstein releases a new album, because I don't listen to that band. If I buy a book and it's too woke for me, I stop reading it and maybe bomb it on Goodreads. If I really hate it I might return it. But I don't see me reading a book with parts I did not like as evidence of a conspiracy to attack my "social capital".

AP, what the fuck does "social capital" mean with respect to video games? Because IIRC, video games aren't the most "social" activity. A video game with elements you do not personally enjoy does not amount to an attack on male privilege and dominance in society. Mario can't be "emasculated"; he's a fictional cartoon character. I don't really understand why having some black NPCs in God of War is going to ruin it for you. And it's not as if there's a set quota of games that can be created each year.

However, if a 'woke game' you don't like becomes popular and critically acclaimed, that would suggest that gamers are voting with their dollars, and that this game might actually have some merit and appeal (mon Deiu!) The male-centered games you like are not being pushed out of the spotlight and forced to share the stage because of video-game affirmative action. Your games are waning in popularity because there are newer, better games out there.

Spoiler

final thought. This Gamergate right-wing game policing is basically like purity testing for video games. (seperating them out as woke vs. tradmasc) If you believe in freedom of expression, it follows that you need to be prepared that others may say or make things you don't like.

 

[AgendaPoster]

(((No Jews)))

Go and beg outside my Marks & Spencer so I can kick your cup over and laugh at you.

You are a fucking idiot.

Imma report you for derailing this lolcow thread.
This is NOT your Man Hate hugbox.

 

[Tablet County]

As for the wokeness coming from the top: why do the moids think they are the OG and only market AAA wants to cater to? Why are you boys pissing yourselves because corporate AAA studios might put some content in the game meant to appeal to a player other than yourself? Is it really so hard to comprehend that if a certain game takes idk, ~$5 million to make, that the people at the top (distributors, executive producers, etc.) would want to hedge their bets to try and get the game to appeal to the widest audience possible? Why is this difficult for you to understand, AP?

Look I appreciate that not everybody who plays games is a straight white dude, but you're going to bat for consulting agencies, a profession that is a cancer upon any industry, not just vidya. Lotta people like to call journalists parasites, but that's probably only because they don't know that consultants exist.
All of the games these agencies are involved with are worse off for them. Even good games are less good because of their unnecessary additions. And their fees are exhorbitant, driving up the cost of making what is already an expensive game and fucking them over in the event that the game sucks dick.
PS: You eat ass.

 

[Stan]

As expected, she is trying to diminish the relevance of the war progressives wage on culture and mock people that see (or worse, care about) how culture and media have been changed by progressives infiltrating it.

29 November 2014 Seriously, Every Day I still see either of those Blue-Arm-Fucked games on the store shelves, hear the cartoon is still on the CN, or No Recall is taking place, the more Pissed I feel. And you know I have messaged those SOBs at SEGA a number of times with No Response since after seeing the cartoon trailer MOTHS ago during E3 time. It makes me so Angry and Frustrated being continuously ignored and swept under the rug to the point where the Action and Growing from Small Threats to make the Manajerks there Listen Up... Yeah, Fuck Them!!! And I never thought I would ever have anything against my favorite colour before that trailer. But, now I am looking to slit their throats with my long fingernails to force the Total Recall of Everything Sonic Boom to Fix the Mistake to happen SOONER! Ugh. And I have no concern of how much money SEGA loses; the Recall of Everything Sonic Boom and Changing the Arm Colour Back MUST Happen IMMEDIATELY AND RIGHT NOW!!!

hard channeling the "SONIC'S ARMS ARE TAN NOT BLUE" tantrum tbqh.

 

[RedMage]

It's a good thing that a list of games exist so people know what not to buy - particularly from developers/publishers that hate them.

It's not their money anyways so I'm not really following on what the issue is if that curation group exists.

 

[AgendaPoster]

As for the wokeness coming from the top: why do the moids think they are the OG and only market AAA wants to cater to? Why are you boys pissing yourselves because corporate AAA studios might put some content in the game meant to appeal to a player other than yourself? Is it really so hard to comprehend that if a certain game takes idk, ~$5 million to make, that the people at the top (distributors, executive producers, etc.) would want to hedge their bets to try and get the game to appeal to the widest audience possible? Why is this difficult for you to understand, AP?

What strikes me here is the selfishness. Like in OG Gamergate, you spuds think that you are the OG, only and forever market for games. I'm sorry guys, but that's not true.

Selfishness indeed. We do NOT want to share things we already owned with anyone else. And if you want to force sharing, well, I will do my best to rile the moids up into an outraged frenzy at their loss.
Is it because I care about games?
FUCK NO LMAO
You know me.
I care about power, institutions, influence, and hierarchy.
I do not intend to share even O2 with progressives. Of any kind.
If I tolerate libs, I will do it on my own terms, when the grugs get too boring and chuddy.
Always remember. It's NEVER about the games.
It's never about you or me.
It's always systems, and the continual flow of power.
Which should be forbidden for you to own, basically.

 

[Marble Jack]

The problem with liberal think-tanks, especially those that focus on media pointed at the Internet, is that they automatically assume gamers are a "white, heterosexual majority", which in itself is bigoted and racist. They also assume that "true diversity" comes from people who look different; not from character arcs or great writing. Self-inserts for the sake of self-aggrandizing behavior under the guise of "inclusion" into multimedia products simply detracts from the substance of the property.

Any character worth its salt is written, not to just overcome an obstacle as a means to "beat a level" or arbitrarily "learn a lesson" but should enrapture the player, the reader or viewer who is accompanying them on their journey so as to make it a meaningful one.

It's not a "conspiracy theory" to want people to write coherently and without a predilection towards preaching their ideologies depending upon a fictional world that shouldn't have them. Whether indie or Triple A, the consumer has the right to demand to this from their supplier as a part of their transactional relationship. Consumers will always vote with their wallets regardless. If you don't like that, then release your games for free.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

I don't know what's got Marge so worked up about a second grassroots consumer revolt. Maybe it's that she's a failed journo wokescold who was BTFO'd the first time around, and she slunk away to her den a decade ago because she's too woman-weak to hold a job.

Marge's world is shitty diapers, sagging tits, expanding waist, cleaning house, enjoying her male forebears money, and enjoying her chink husband's money he brings to her while she sits and eats. She's never had to work a day in her life. Now she makes and minds babies. What a liberated, modern sow woman.

 

[AgendaPoster]

liberal think-tanks, especially those that focus on media pointed at the Internet,

To clarify.
This is what Marge and her libs allies are trying to whitewash here:

These people are your sworn enemies if you are a right wing white cishet male. Hell, if you are a right wing male of ANY kind, these are your enemies.
They are explicitly trying to destroy your status in society. They explicitly hate and demean your demographic. They want revenge on you.
So you should be fighting with overwhelming, crushing power against these people.
Bundle of sticks strong together.
The video should be watched in full. No, it's not "cringe", it's enemy propaganda and should be never underestimated.

 

[Stan]

Look I appreciate that not everybody who plays games is a straight white dude, but you're going to bat for consulting agencies, a profession that is a cancer upon any industry, not just vidya. Lotta people like to call journalists parasites, but that's probably only because they don't know that consultants exist.

I appreciate that consulting companies are hot garbage fires of style over substance (one of my friends worked in consultancy before moving on to ECC), but the idea that this one firm is responsible for everything you hate, and that there's this shadowy liberal conspiracy to brainwash you with games, doesn't make sense.

IMO I'm not really sticking my neck out for SBI, idc about them. I do think it's noteworthy how many of you feel so entitled that you want mandated fan service and games with only explicitly white characters, and I'm amazed by how threatened the userbase here is by the idea of games written to appeal to a broader audience than just them.

Selfishness indeed. We do NOT want to share things we already owned with anyone else. And if you want to force sharing, well, I will do my best to rile the moids up into an outraged frenzy at their loss.

What is there for you to share?! If you don't like a game for being too woke, dont fucking play it! Do you honestly believe men have the right to decide whether or not women and troons can make, market, and play games that appeal to them? You sound like a little boy telling me that the playground is for boys only; we got here first, no girls on the playground, and if we see you playing elsewhere we'll throw rocks at you to make you stop. Why do you think men have (or should have) the authority to stop anyone from making the novel/game/movie/album they want to make?

It's a really authoritarian view, like a video game version of Heroic Socialism, where you could get yourself (or your game) sent to the gulag because you emasculated Mario one too many times.

I care about power, institutions, influence, and hierarchy.
I do not intend to share even O2 with progressives. Of any kind.

I don't know why you talk to me so often, then.

Are you aware how aggressively authoritarian your idealized world appears? You seem to desire a world where being liberal gets you sent to the gulag, where 'degenerate' media can be purged, where the press is just a mouthpiece for the administration, where history is airbrushed by the censors into lore. Are you sure this is what you want? Because this world sounds like a right-wing riff on the plot of 1984.

It's always systems, and the continual flow of power.
Which should be forbidden for you to own, basically.

OK then you are my eternal political enemy. You want to suppress my political views, would like to not "share O2" with people like me, would like to ban media meant to appeal to me, and uh, you want to make it "forbidden" for people like me to exercise any political power. So you're not only as purge-y and ideologically rigid as those on the Left, you're also diametrically opposed to my political existence.

I still like you though. Mostly because I know you can't achieve any of this, no more than I can bring about the start of a glorious, worldwide Socialist utopia. And it makes you seethe that you can't, because moids like you kind of think the world should revolve around them.

 

[AgendaPoster]

If you don't like a game for being too woke, dont fucking play it! Do you honestly believe men have the right to decide whether or not women and troons can make, market, and play games that appeal to them? You sound like a little boy telling me that the playground is for boys only; we got here first, no girls on the playground, and if we see you playing elsewhere we'll throw rocks at you to make you stop. Why do you think men have (or should have) the authority to stop anyone from making the novel/game/movie/album they want to make?

I am illiberal and anti-libertarian, I hate free markets and corporate "liberty", so yes babe.

 

[Stan]

Bundle of sticks strong together.

Can I call a Godwin's Law yet? Because you are bringing up explicitly fascist symbology and telling me you are fine with media purges and book burnings and political imprisonment.

Anyway, good luck trying to force the world to conform to your will.

 

[Ken Barlow]

Clitoris. Find it.

And we be quiet about "things"

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Can I call a Godwin's Law yet? Because you are bringing up explicitly fascist symbology and telling me you are fine with media purges and book burnings and political imprisonment.

Book burnings like the Quran during the Reconquista, or Hirschfeld's trans butchery? Nothing oppressive about burning objectively evil books.

Anyway, good luck trying to force the world to conform to your will.

Projection. You failed hard trying this.

 

[AgendaPoster]

OK then you are my eternal political enemy. You want to suppress my political views, would like to not "share O2" with people like me, would like to ban media meant to appeal to me, and uh, you want to make it "forbidden" for people like me to exercise any political power. So you're not only as purge-y and ideologically rigid as those on the Left, you're also diametrically opposed to my political existence.

Sadly, I am. But I am also honest about it, so you know what to expect from me.
I am more intolerant nowadays, cause the situation is quite critical and a lot of people that should be my allies are fucking asleep and getting fat and lazy, not understanding what comes next. But as we restore normalcy and people stop rebelling all the damn time, I would become far more friendly. I would not ban much, just media positively representing degeneracy, demanding inclusion, or marginalized group empowerment. All attempts to rewrite history, yeah.
Not the first time being done. Denazification, remember it? Was far larger in scope than burning the books on trannies from Weimar etc.
It's OK Marge.
Sometimes there's a conflict between groups, and until one wins and subdues the other, situation is a bit tense. That's basically all, but that shouldn't really affect our good friendship
After all, you are not respecting any progressive males. So... yeah.

 

[Stan]

I don't know what's got Marge so worked up about a second grassroots consumer revolt. Maybe it's that she's a failed journo wokescold who was BTFO'd the first time around, and she slunk away to her den a decade ago because she's too woman-weak to hold a job.

Marge's world is shitty diapers, sagging tits, expanding waist, cleaning house, enjoying her male forebears money, and enjoying her chink husband's money he brings to her while she sits and eats. She's never had to work a day in her life. Now she makes and minds babies. What a liberated, modern sow woman.

Bless your heart, you're vile.

Seriously, kill yourself. It's not going to get any better for you, faggot.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Bless your heart, you're vile.

Seriously, kill yourself. It's not going to get any better for you, faggot.

Go check for chink SIDS.

 

[Gay Baby Jailer]

Marge's world is shitty diapers, sagging tits, expanding waist, cleaning house, enjoying her male forebears money, and enjoying her chink husband's money he brings to her while she sits and eats. She's never had to work a day in her life. Now she makes and minds babies. What a liberated, modern sow woman.

Dude do you know how many CHUDS she has to SHUT down on kwf? She has NO time for some stinky crotch baby.

and that there's this shadowy liberal conspiracy to brainwash you with games, doesn't make sense.

Whats so shadowy about it? They literally say they want representation in games mostly played by white men.

Why do you think men have (or should have) the authority to stop anyone from making the novel/game/movie/album they want to make?

Because its all thats offered. It is the dominating force setting the tone for all current works of art. Honestly whats your stake in it? Youre a fat jewess who eats ass and looks like a little boy, probably why you could only find some similarly androgynous chinaman to marry you. Do you even play games? Why shouldn't the majority faction be the majority represented? how many black women are playing Alan wake? How many women play borderlands? The cast has no main male characters anymore (other than a homosexual)
You're just dong the tired Saul Alinsky malicious compliance, don't like the way we handle roads? Then don't drive on them chud!

Is it really so hard to comprehend that if a certain game takes idk, ~$5 million to make, that the people at the top (distributors, executive producers, etc.) would want to hedge their bets to try and get the game to appeal to the widest audience possible? Why is this difficult for you to understand, AP?

There is no evidence this is the case.
Why not put white people in black entertainment television? then whites might actually watch it. All of this activity is only happening in one direction that is demonstrably anti white male.

 

[Tablet County]

but the idea that this one firm is responsible for everything you hate,

They aren't. They're just the ones who decided to chimp out about a steam page and brought public attention upon themselves. There are thousands of SBI-alikes who deserve to be thrown out on their ass without giving them their jacket.

and that there's this shadowy liberal conspiracy to brainwash you with games, doesn't make sense.

That's not the point, no matter what our gypsy scholar says. They aren't trying to brainwash people, they are trying to force something that would come about naturally without their intereference.
While I wouldn't call it a shadowy liberal conspiracy, given Blackrock's obsession with pushing left-wing ideals by handing out monetary rewards for adhering to them, it wouldn't be that much of a stretch.

I do think it's noteworthy how many of you feel so entitled that you want mandated fan service and games with only explicitly white characters, and I'm amazed by how threatened the userbase here is by the idea of games written to appeal to a broader audience than just them.

I'm not. It's not a desperate desire for white people that I give a shit about, it's that diversity is just another corporate tool now. A decade ago if I saw a gay, unattractive black woman in a video game I wouldn't have thought anything of it. But now that I know that said gay, unattractive black woman is only there because it was mandated by some overpaid glorified ideas guy, you can feel the artifice, it takes you out of the experience and it shouldn't.
It's like in the late 90s and early 2000s when corporate bigwigs would make something "cool" or "extreme". Diversity has gone from a desirable goal to a low-hanging fruit which you can dangle in front of simple-minded consumers, much like sex and "coolness" used to be. Only those things actually get people to buy shit, diversity only gets you bailouts from Blackrock.

Clitoris. Find it.

And we be quiet about "things"

This is completely irrelevant and you should kill yourself.

 

[Shidoen]

Of course a Gamer Gate Alumni would defend the recent revelations of bad writing and stupid insertions.