Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

[Jaimas]

I'm probably fucking retarded for even suggesting this, but you don't strive to correct the things you got wrong? It's not about doing favors, or even bending the knee, I'd want to do what i could to get things right. My biggest issue with journos isn't that they openly lie, everyone does that, my issue with most of them is they don't give a shit about what they get wrong, they just let stuff they got wrong stand. Give it soem thought at least. And where the FUCK are the new recipes you mentioned!!!

I'll answer that, because it highlights something interesting.

Very broadly speaking, people like Pless do not believe objective reality exists independently from human perception. Instead, they believe that all knowledge is subjective, and can be viewed through the lenses of class, race, gender, and above all others, power. You can see this in the articles she's written (the ones that aren't blatant hit-pieces at least) where she intentionally reinforces a narrative, even if the logical steps taken to explain that narrative involve making things up or misrepresenting things.

A side effect of this is that she is systemically a hypocrite, and is because that hypocrisy serves a purpose. She will gleefully hold others to standards she has absolutely no intention of ever meeting. She will never have any discussion in good faith (while complaining about the lack of good faith herself), never actually reflect on the nature of her actions, and certainly never respond directly to any post who strays from simply calling her filthy names and instead bends her over and gives her both barrels because of her behavior specifically. Every single thing she complains about when it comes to online behavior is something she, herself, has done - and she does not see any of the horrible things she's done over the years as wrong.

The proof is in the pudding, or in this case, the posting: Pless has been doing this shit for over a decade. She fucking brags about it, and feels she's above everyone else over it, while at the same time being morally bankrupt. All of this macks of a hilarious amount of projection and compensation. Just read her works, and especially her recent posts, and you'll see exactly what the fuck I'm talking about.

Pless would sooner die than own her own fuck-ups. That's what makes her a lolcow.

 

[Teghern]

The proof is in the pudding, or in this case, the posting: Pless has been doing this shit for over a decade. She fucking brags about it, and feels she's above everyone else over it, while at the same time being morally bankrupt. All of this macks of a hilarious amount of projection and compensation. Just read her works, and especially her recent posts, and you'll see exactly what the fuck I'm talking about.

Yes she is truly an archetype defined as a perfect specimen of everything one could despise about the journoscum.
What drives her to remain here however? She proclaims she dislikes this place, she declares herself above it, yet still she remains.
A retard too dumb to realize just where they are and what they're doing, a Bryan Dunn?
An extreme example of the hysteria of attention seeking, an echo of Elaine?
Or maybe she just enjoys it here and like a functional addict of a pill popping alcoholic still keeps up that 9-5 kindly letting us all know whenever she'll be away for the weekend before zipping back early anyway. I really don't get it.

 

[Montalbane]

Is she any good at eating ass?

 

[AgendaPoster]

Is she any good at eating ass?

How Jewish affluent are you?

 

[Stan]

I'll answer that, because it highlights something interesting.

Very broadly speaking, people like Pless do not believe objective reality exists independently from human perception. Instead, they believe that all knowledge is subjective, and can be viewed through the lenses of class, race, gender, and above all others, power. You can see this in the articles she's written (the ones that aren't blatant hit-pieces at least) where she intentionally reinforces a narrative, even if the logical steps taken to explain that narrative involve making things up or misrepresenting things.

A side effect of this is that she is systemically a hypocrite, and is because that hypocrisy serves a purpose. She will gleefully hold others to standards she has absolutely no intention of ever meeting. She will never have any discussion in good faith (while complaining about the lack of good faith herself), never actually reflect on the nature of her actions, and certainly never respond directly to any post who strays from simply calling her filthy names and instead bends her over and gives her both barrels because of her behavior specifically. Every single thing she complains about when it comes to online behavior is something she, herself, has done - and she does not see any of the horrible things she's done over the years as wrong.

The proof is in the pudding, or in this case, the posting: Pless has been doing this shit for over a decade. She fucking brags about it, and feels she's above everyone else over it, while at the same time being morally bankrupt. All of this macks of a hilarious amount of projection and compensation. Just read her works, and especially her recent posts, and you'll see exactly what the fuck I'm talking about.

Pless would sooner die than own her own fuck-ups. That's what makes her a lolcow.

Yes she is truly an archetype defined as a perfect specimen of everything one could despise about the journoscum.
What drives her to remain here however? She proclaims she dislikes this place, she declares herself above it, yet still she remains.
A retard too dumb to realize just where they are and what they're doing, a Bryan Dunn?
An extreme example of the hysteria of attention seeking, an echo of Elaine?
Or maybe she just enjoys it here and like a functional addict of a pill popping alcoholic still keeps up that 9-5 kindly letting us all know whenever she'll be away for the weekend before zipping back early anyway. I really don't get it.

Both of you are wrong. I've stated my reasoning to not retract my article a couple of times, but here's the Cliff's Notes:

1. I don't want to rehabilitate the Farms' earned reputation as a cesspit of bigotry and abuse.

2. Trying to bully me into writing an article extolling the Kiwi Farms is not going to work. You can keep calling me fat and dumb and self-absorbed, Jewish, whatever you want. It does not move me one jot and you're collectively retarded to think you can coerce me into doing you a giant favor like that, given the way you talk about and to me.

3. Even if I wanted to help you, I couldn't. This is because the Kiwi Farms is not so radically different from when I described it in 2016 to warrant the wholesale retraction that you guys want me to write you. What am I going to do? Extol your rampant racism and bigotry to the normies like that is worth preserving? Please, pitch me things I could discuss in writing to try and burnish Kiwi Farms' reputation. Cause in my experience whenever you guys get a win (like the monkeys) , you've also gotten like 10 technical fouls and doxxed someone based on their drawer pulls.

4. And this is the smallest concern: It's really hard to pull retractions or make corrections on articles that are 8 years old.

 

[Gremperor]

You can keep calling me fat and dumb and self-absorbed, Jewish

I like how you lumped "jewish" in with the other insults lol.

 

[Teghern]

Both of you are wrong. I've stated my reasoning to not retract my article a couple of times, but here's the Cliff's Notes:

We were quite clearly musing about your presence here using the website you dimwit, maybe try and address the subject matter instead of dodging it in favour of the latest rent-free phantasm and people might treat you less contemptuously. I do like this ghost though.

In regards to your article, you don't want to, fine.
No interest in coercing you on my part because that would defeat my purpose; for you to do so of your own will, the journey being the destination.
As for the website not being different, most of the people posting here giving you grief weren't even around, how is that not different in the Theseusian sense? And that's with setting aside what is actually at fault here.
Because none of this changes the fact for you should make an effort, as it is an historic document now and the fact is contains blatant inaccuracies that are 100% purely simply not true like the "spawned from 4chan" nonsense (I wouldn't call them lies as I sincerely believe you didn't know any better) means it ought to be fixed.
Even the Bible gets an update every so often, I think a retrospective anniversy edition (revised) would be worth it.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

1. I don't want to rehabilitate the Farms' earned reputation as a cesspit of bigotry and abuse.

I give as good as I get.

You're no better.

2. Trying to bully me into writing an article

Your hitpiece article was bullying and misrepresenting us. You're the bully. Progressivism is why you can't say Feminism excludes men in dresses anywhere else online. You're the cancer, Marge, you lumpy, fast-growing tumor.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

1. I don't want to rehabilitate the Farms' earned reputation as a cesspit of bigotry and abuse.

You mean a reputation based of provable lies?

2. Trying to bully me into writing an article extolling the Kiwi Farms is not going to work. You can keep calling me fat and dumb and self-absorbed, Jewish, whatever you want. It does not move me one jot and you're collectively retarded to think you can coerce me into doing you a giant favor like that, given the way you talk about and to me.

Imagine being what? In your 40's and claiming people are bulling you I taught my daughter to stand up for herself if she ever got bulled again and she was 5 at the time. What the fucks is your excuse?

3. Even if I wanted to help you, I couldn't. This is because the Kiwi Farms is not so radically different from when I described it in 2016 to warrant the wholesale retraction that you guys want me to write you. What am I going to do? Extol your rampant racism and bigotry to the normies like that is worth preserving? Please, pitch me things I could discuss in writing to try and burnish Kiwi Farms' reputation. Cause in my experience whenever you guys get a win (like the monkeys) , you've also gotten like 10 technical fouls and doxxed someone based on their drawer pulls.

I've been here for seven years, it's quite different. Certainly different than how the media perceives it. For starters it's not the echo chamber the media wants society to think it is. There's no trolling plains going on because doing such stupid things will get you doxed. No one has died because of this website and in truth this site has archived the reasons for peoples deaths. Not one website has gone off and talked about users have helped put criminals behind bars either. Or ties Cloudflare has with former FBI agents, or how one host has people who are pedophiles working for them. Everything is archived so it's easy to take that and run a story, no one wants to though because journalists today are just simple bloggers that are too lazy to do any work.

By the way, I've seen racist remarks and bigotry come from your posts too so try and not throw stones around here. Remember what I said about the users here.

4. And this is the smallest concern: It's really hard to pull retractions or make corrections on articles that are 8 years old.

When one can't retract or make corrections because a site doesn't allow them to do so they make an all new article. At least that's what real journalists do here. Even if it's an opinion piece that not many people will read.

 

[AgendaPoster]

1. I don't want to rehabilitate the Farms' earned reputation as a cesspit of bigotry and abuse.

And if you wanted, you could not.
It would be naive to assume other journos are not here and likely taking notes of your transgressions against progressive dogma, to use it in the future. Writing anything neutral or positive about KF would result in an online cancellation campaign and bullying so intense that you would BEG for these KF chuds to be the ones being nasty to you. Your church and univ would get phone calls and emails with all your collected data. Your bank even.
Your only choice is to pretend you're still the same progressive lady as you were in 2016-ish, while occassionally dropping some slurs and misgenderings and hoping nobody of worth notices.
Also, do keep in mind, this is the only place where the owner gave you a sheltered spot where you can be an anti-moid bigot (cause that's exactly what that thread is for) and no rightoid can attack you. Now that's not actually progressive, but it is kinda radfem, at least.
But yeah, you must surely know that right wingers pose no threat to you, compared to your shitlib and progressive compadres that would fucking destroy your life without a single fuck being given, as that's the real nature of this ideology.

 

[Dyn]

Please, pitch me things I could discuss in writing to try and burnish Kiwi Farms' reputation

Write a full length article about the quality of my penis selfies.

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

I don't think press is necessary for KF. I would rather not expose wider audiences to this place, especially more redditfags.

Please keep writing articles on how bad we are. Hopefully the peabrains will believe that shit and stay away.

 

[Sammich]

I don't think press is necessary for KF.

That's not really the point, I don't think. The point, for me at least, was to show just how she is fine with lies being run against others, but gets very upset and quick to report when they are told about her. Honestly, i wish she was banned along with a couple other posters here, but not my website, and i'm fine with it.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I don't think press is necessary for KF. I would rather not expose wider audiences to this place, especially more redditfags.

Please keep writing articles on how bad we are. Hopefully the peabrains will believe that shit and stay away.

X posts saying "Kiwifarms was right" has done more for the reputation of this site than any journalist could hope for. Normal every day people trust other normal people more than they trust any journalist.

 

[Stan]

But yeah, you must surely know that right wingers pose no threat to you, compared to your shitlib and progressive compadres that would fucking destroy your life without a single fuck being given, as that's the real nature of this ideology.

Who's going to call me out, Peter Coffin?

Write a full length article about the quality of my penis selfies.

See lads now that is a pitch I can work with!

That's not really the point, I don't think. The point, for me at least, was to show just how she is fine with lies being run against others, but gets very upset and quick to report when they are told about her. Honestly, i wish she was banned along with a couple other posters here, but not my website, and i'm fine with it.

Notes:
I don't necessarily notice when lies about other 3rd parties are posted on the Kiwi Farms.
Everyone using the report button has a measure of self-interest in their reports.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

I want her to write an article explaining why she preyed on innocent yeshiva men who didn't know that she was gonna eat out their asses. Why go after young sexually naive men or try to homewreck some "old" Jewish guys marriage? This topic hits hard because @Stan and I were around in the same areas at roughly the same time, if it wasn't for the grace of an infinitely kind and loving God it could have been my ass she preyed upon, both figuratively and literally.

 

[Dr. Jaime Reyes]

Write a full length article about the quality of my penis selfies.

If we get enough takers it could just be a listicle. Are those still in? YouTube thumbnail with a soy face, “TOP TEN KIWI DONGS! #7 Will Shock You!”

 

[Jaimas]

Write a full length article about the quality of my penis selfies.

That would actually be interesting, which immediately makes it off-limits.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Looks like more bloggers have to learn to code after all the people working at Deadspin lost their jobs. Such a great year for modern "journalists".

That would actually be interesting, which immediately makes it off-limits.

I thought such photos posted here were actually Likeicares' penis which got the site in trouble due to how small it was?

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

This is why you aren't as fat as Marge.

Apparently, he was, but marriage made all the difference.

I looked up the nutricional value of ass.

I love posts like this.

1. I don't want to rehabilitate the Farms' earned reputation as a cesspit of bigotry and abuse.

You have said many bigoted and abusive things here. It strikes as disingenuous to criticize a place for those things when the very nature of it enables you to do the exact same things - and you do.

You don't have any high ground. Yes, you're hit with a lot of low and stupid blows... as well as some fair criticism. You participate equally in that. I hate the dogpiling (on you or others, especially other women in a mostly male environment), but you spend 80% of your time/words provoking it and going as low as (just about) anyone.

And as a fellow Episcopalian - though not, in my case, a regular practitioner or attendant lately - I don't know how you can reconcile your behavior here with your position as church staff or your confidant relationship with your rector. Not the slurs, and not the smugness. One thing I love about the EC is the rationality leg of the stool, and the acceptance of human nature and behavior/ lack of hysteria about minor "sins." But deliberately ugly behavior is something I don't know how you defend or reconcile in good conscience with your church or as someone who makes a point of their piety*.

*same applies to other advertisers of faith here and anywhere