Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

Oh God these are part of a countdown to "year 2" (with muscial notes emojis)
View attachment 5804685
(L-R a Real Housewife, a Tiktok Starlet and "a queer black/latinx trans woman seeking to change the world", all professionally photographed on some sort of set)
I think we might be getting a Day 365 of Girlhood II: Day 730. Probably not quite as large a production, but no doubt we'll be getting more of Dylan singing out of tune in the very near future.
How long has his neck been extensible like that?
 
I'm unironically entertaining an idea that Alok irl is very much based bordering alt-right individual who sacrifices his reputation and image to let everyone know how fucking pathetic and uncunny a hairy ogre looks in a woman's dress. If you have anyone believing in the gender ideology - just show them Alok.

Also, fucking Gaga. Where are the new albums? Where is music, Gaga? Less faggots, more music.
 
Dylan was on a panel at SXSW - When Beer Goes Viral: The Role of Brands & Media in Fighting Hate
gettyimages-2066795258-2048x2048.jpggettyimages-2066794974-2048x2048.jpg
"When trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney partnered with a major beer brand, the right-wing seized on the campaign. The company’s response only exacerbated things further – while conventional and social media platforms helped elevate small groups of anti-trans radicals. This panel will dive into the responsibility of brands and the media to not fuel the fire of misinformation and discrimination. Attendees will better understand how to spot the pitfalls of elevating sensational, hate-filled content aimed at undermining the acceptance and inclusion of LGBTQ+ people."
He was joined by Kelley Robinson (President of the Human Rights Campaign), Aaron Walton (CEO of Walton Isaacson, a "culture driven" advertising agency) and Jo Yurcaba (freelance NBC News LGBT correspondent).
During the panel, Mulvaney discussed her personal experience being at the center of an anti-LGBTQ+ corporate controversy and the precautions content creators can take to ensure they are working with brands who will fully support them.

“To see all of the hate that came from just one advertisement on Instagram was so disheartening. And then it became a very real world thing where I had people showing up to my house and being followed and harassed in public. That was something I would have never thought was going to be a part of my daily life. I would never wish that on anyone, especially any other trans or queer content creator…More than ever, for any queer or trans talent, we need to be communicating with actual humans behind these campaigns. A lot of the times when a brand puts together a campaign, there’s no trans or queer person even on that team shaping this content…That extra step of really getting to know a talent and what they want to put out into the world and what their hopes are for this campaign can make everything a lot smoother.”

Aaron Walton also mentioned how it’s critical for brands to support the LGBTQ+ community all year round and the steps they can take to be good corporate allies.

“Good partners aren’t there just during the good times, good partners are there when a community like ours is under attack. That's the definition of a good partner. Those are the people that we are going to remember. Those are the people that are going to survive and wake up on the ride side of history because they did the right thing….It is an ongoing journey to be a partner with the LGBTQ+ community. And that doesn’t mean just stepping up during June and Pride months. I tell folks I am Black and gay 365 days a year. I am not just Black in February during Black History month. Nor am I just gay in June during Pride month. So, if you want my loyalty, if you want my relationship as an advocate for your brand you have to be talking to me 365 days a year.”

Yurcaba discussed best practices for how reporters can responsibly cover LGBTQ+ issues while combating misinformation.

“In covering what happened to Dylan, the first thing that we really wanted to do was obviously center the hate that she was facing. A lot of people were talking about beer sales. And so we really want to focus on how this is actually affecting people’s lives. This happened within the context of state legislatures last year considered more than 500 bills targeting LGBTQ+ people. And we saw Target face similar backlash for a Pride campaign they did over the summer. So, we show people that this isn’t happening in a vacuum and this has real effects on people’s lives.”

While moderating the panel, Kelley Robinson reinforced the importance of LGBTQ+ advocacy in the corporate space and beyond.

“One thing that’s very clear— we are in a moment where you have horrific anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation across the country. There are kids out there looking to adults to see what we are going to do. And not being visible, not being out loud about our allyship is simply not an option. So, we’ve got to make sure that these companies are doing the right thing internally. But also standing up boldly and publicly about these things that matter.”
When deciding on how to get dressed for this professional speaking panel, he apparently settled on "little girl"
gettyimages-2066795153-2048x2048 (1).jpggettyimages-2073944143-2048x2048.jpggettyimages-2073944139-2048x2048.jpggettyimages-2073925241-2048x2048.jpggettyimages-2073944138-2048x2048.jpg
The shirt is Miu Miu and costs £590/$750. I think the skirt is also Miu Miu and so easily could have cost an additional £1500/$1900 (at least - Miu Miu is expensive). This isn't actually that far removed from how Miu Miu styles their models, but I can't get over his weird Eloise skinwalking from before and his gurning isn't helping with the ick.
 

Attachments

  • gettyimages-2066795153-2048x2048 (1).jpg
    gettyimages-2066795153-2048x2048 (1).jpg
    333.7 KB · Views: 42
This panel will dive into the responsibility of brands and the media to not fuel the fire of misinformation and discrimination. Attendees will better understand how to spot the pitfalls of elevating sensational, hate-filled content aimed at undermining the acceptance and inclusion of LGBTQ+ people."
Jfc what a clueless panel. This is marketing 101. You don't shit on your core audience. You're selling cheap beer, not trannies.
Kelley Robinson (President of the Human Rights Campaign), Aaron Walton (CEO of Walton Isaacson, a "culture driven" advertising agency) and Jo Yurcaba (freelance NBC News LGBT correspondent).
Beer? [insert the 'Toss interracial burger ad comic here]
SXSW® is best known for its conference and festivals that celebrate the convergence of tech, film, music, education, and culture.
Idk what the hell this is supposed to be but it ain't marketing.
 
Could've used something a bit more supportive for that one.
Women would know this because we're used to wear bras since we're like 12. These are fetishes for these men.

Buying a bra that actually fits can be quite an odyssey for women, not some "tee hee" experience as troons make morons believe.
 
It's forcing a square peg into a round hole

For the few instances where it ain't forcing a square peg into a round hole, it's a colossal effort that's avant garde or otherwise meant to provoke and disturb. Case in point: Tim Curry's entire performance as Dr. Frank N. Furter in Rocky Horror.


Now I fucking love Rocky Horror: it's a fun movie to watch with drunk/high friends, and it's even more hilarious to witness the more prudish among your circle of friends freak out the moment that "Sweet Transvestite" starts playing (I still need to see the play, but that's neither here nor there). That said: it always struck me as fucking bizarre that trannies would take so well to 70s Tim Curry in drag, considering how Frank N. Furter is a canonically unrepentant murderer and sexual deviant.

Also, while Tim Curry in drag don't "pass," I will say that the look works for him for multiple reasons:

1. 70s Tim Curry was in the prime of his youth, and had an unmatched charisma that would shine through even his worst performances.
2. Rocky Horror was originally a stage production that Tim Curry already performed in, so he was intimately familiar with the role before the movie began production.
3. Costume/makeup/wardrobe teams exist, and Tim Curry definitely had multiple people doing his eyeliner, fitting him for the corset, assembling the look, blah blah blah.
4. Lastly, and this is the most important one: Tim Curry was (and still is) a dapper, well-groomed, and hygienic gentleman who put 110% into the roles he starred in.

Lazy, smelly, ugly men will look at 70s Tim Curry dressed as Frank N. Furter and think "Wow, she is literally me!" Many such cases, I'm afraid.
 
Last edited:
That said: it always struck me as fucking bizarre that trannies would take so well to 70s Tim Curry in drag, considering how Frank N. Furter is a canonically unrepentant murderer and sexual deviant.
Aguably it's not bizarre at all considering all the horrific shit we've seen troons do over the years.
 
The difference between a Frank n furter transvestite and a transgender is that the fnf transvestite is feminine in a way that emphasizes his manhood. That's why he's named after sausages. He might kill someone for misgendering him, but he is too dignified for a gassy "it's ma'am!"

But rocky horror being so trendy just before 2010 is probably why the trans thing is so big now. I even remember having grade schooler relatives who were enraptured by it. Maybe I should have been more scandalized, but I was just shocked because of how boring the movie is, since at that time kids weren't taken to that kind of stage show.
 
Maybe I should have been more scandalized, but I was just shocked because of how boring the movie is, since at that time kids weren't taken to that kind of stage show.
It should really be watched much like The Room is now (and which RH pioneered), that is, with a batch of intensely autistic weirdoes acting out during the movie, throwing shit at the screen, yelling meme responses, etc.
 
Also, fucking Gaga. Where are the new albums? Where is music, Gaga? Less faggots, more music.
Seriously. Her popularity may have bottomed out, but I’m sure she could still pull a crowd. There were some hidden gems in her albums.

That said: it always struck me as fucking bizarre that trannies would take so well to 70s Tim Curry in drag, considering how Frank N. Furter is a canonically unrepentant murderer and sexual deviant.
Let us not forget that his 2 cohorts killed him and ran off because his “lifestyle’s too extreme.”

Tim was really one of a kind. No one else could pull that off. I put him in the category of those 70’s and 80’s “glam rock” types where they weren’t trying to be feminine per se and they weren’t trying to be women, because they didn’t need to. It still had its certain sex appeal without…whatever the fuck trannies are suppose to be.
 
Cross dressers and transvestites used to be glamorous. The idea was to perform a character that was top-notch fabulous and stylish. Curry was a "what if the transvestite is a psycho rapist murderer?" take and he did the part. But on top of it, he did look amazing. Troons are lazy fuckers who gave up at being masculine because they never tried and they're equally lame as being women.

But rocky horror being so trendy just before 2010 is probably why the trans thing is so big now. I even remember having grade schooler relatives who were enraptured by it. Maybe I should have been more scandalized, but I was just shocked because of how boring the movie is, since at that time kids weren't taken to that kind of stage show.
Glee had a Rocky Horror episode during the peak of its popularity, so it might be because of that...

img-2024-03-11-23-15-27.png
 
Tim was really one of a kind. No one else could pull that off. I put him in the category of those 70’s and 80’s “glam rock” types where they weren’t trying to be feminine per se and they weren’t trying to be women, because they didn’t need to. It still had its certain sex appeal without…whatever the fuck trannies are suppose to be.

I fucking hate trannies for conditioning me to think that anyone dressing remotely androgynously could possibly be a tranny. Hurts even more, considering how so many musical icons had similar aesthetics.

I'm not well-versed with Prince's musical output, but I do know that he's a fucking androgynous fashion icon. Unfortunately, pulling off anything remotely close to Prince is far too much effort for the average MTF tranny. On a similar note: Robert Smith of The Cure doesn't look right if he's on stage without eyeliner, lipstick, and a keyboard in front of him, but it's impossible to think that a look like his would work for the first time in today's environment. Not without being inundated by mouth-breathing LGBTQ+ mongoloids clamouring about their newest trans icon or whatever.

Never forget that as a homosexual male, this type of fashion should be second nature to Dylan. Yet he continues to skinwalk.
 
Back