- Joined
- Jan 6, 2017
This is a very optimistic interpretation, but that's clearly not what he's saying at all. He said "one of you has a direct line to Elon, and you need to use it".I’m not sure if this was covered already but I interpreted his tweet about “someone has a line to Elon” as a reaction to the antifas and the thread being banned already and not about asking it to be banned, considering the doxx op and the thread were banned already by the time he made the tweet.
Stonetoss to me is implying that someone on his side probably asked Elon to delete the doxx on his behalf which is exactly the type of insider influence antithetical to free and open discussion, even if it was about his own personal information, which is an admirable thing to say
He says that he is impervious to intimidation yet discusses it as a tactic, which seems like he’s saying although the doxx doesn’t bother him, banning the information can be used as an intimidation tactic to stifle speech.
He complains that "Elon's idea of free speech" is one where "people can be intimidated into silence". How are doxers getting intimidated? Wouldn't it be the doxees?
What's "if he needs a shortlist of the worst offenders, that can easily be provided" supposed to mean in your context? What type of list is he providing, and what for, if he's pro-doxing?
It's sad that he's taking the little bitch route of "BAN THESE USERS ZOMG" when it wouldn't even matter at this point, since the cat's out of the bag (and if they can't dox on Twitter, they'll just go to another website where they can dox, and just link it on Twitter), when you know he wouldn't care if it was a lefty who got doxed, but it is what it is.