Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
TRAs are so excited to finally have "evidence" for their "JKR is literally hitler" claims. How are trannies able to keep stealing from other people without repercussions? Black lives matter->Trans lives matter. Women's rights are human rights->Trans rights are human rights. etc etc. Have they taken "never again" for their totally real trans genocide yet?
You're kidding. Right?
 
Regarding how stupid they will go with the holocaust denial lies, I imagine the answer is something along the lines of "unbelievably, retardedly stupid". The tranny chasing left are now so insistent on riding any lie into the ground, that it wouldn't suprise me to see skull theory asserting that JK Rowling is Eva Braun.

I post on a fairly left dominant sports forum (UK based, although there are a fair few Americans), and the politics section is just dopey cunts posting tweets from 'right wing' randoms with a comment of "gammon", "tories blah blah", "biggotry blah blah", or "we are not a serious country..." There's no sign of this changing.

I suppose the aftermath of Covid was a good indicator that the light will just never switch on for these people, but I was naively optimistic that they would be peaked by SOMETHING that trans activism is pushing. Like Covid, CRT, immigration, 'defund da police' (in the UK lol), Tories/Trump before it, however, something has switched in their heads and they will now defend men in dresses at all cost.

This goes well beyond bipartisan politics, when you show a Rowling a-log a video of a 'chest feeding' sex pest, provide them with public, mainstream information that this is being pushed by partners to atleast 4 NHS hostpitals, and they aren't even slightly curious, I think it's fair to assume they're either genuinely retarded, a paedophile, or a literal demon.
 
Entschuldige! Erwin Gohrbandt performed the first ever recorded SRS operation on that Danish man, Lili Elbe (Kurt Warnekros did the rest of the surgeries). Herr Gohrbandt also had a lot of success elsewhere, doing human experimentation at Dachau. Elbe was at the Hirschfeld Institute. Did the Nazis burn those books? Yeah, but all this Nazi mad science is interconnected so that was mostly friendly fire.
 
What the fuck?
Screenshot_20240315-230314_(1).png
Archive.
 
I mean, I'm not an expert on the history of Nazi Germany or anything, but I think I might have a bit of a funny feeling that I know why the Nazis specifically targeted the work of (((Magnus Hirschfeld))).

I mean, I'm not saying that it wasn't the nature of (((Magnus Hirschfeld)))'s research that was the problem, I'm just saying I don't think it was necessarily the trans stuff that they primarily had a problem with. I think there might possibly have been something else about (((Magnus Hirschfeld))) that they might have disliked.

Again, I'm not an expert, though.
He was gay, jewish, and a socialist. I don't think the nazis were waiting to see if he was a tranny supporter before declaring him an enemy. He was already their 3 least favorite things. He was also a hardcore eugenicist, which might seem weird given socialists of today are against heckin' racism/ableism, but this was pretty mainstream on the left in the 1920s so it's not that weird.
 
“Raped and dismembered” is certainly reading a lot into the text. It’s been a minute since I’ve read the books but I recall it being a more fade-to-black situation. It’s not like the heroes can report her torture of underage students to the government, she was the government. The centaurs (totally native/indigenous metaphor!!1) ask to deal with her and take her into the woods to deliver centaur justice. I don’t get it. That’s the kind of thing the left would love. But now it’s bad because omg terf!! Omg hitler!!
 
She was definitely not dismembered because she comes back in the next book, and there is no rape in the Harry Potter books because they are for kids.

Edit: also excuse the sperging, but she doesn't "give him detention once", she uses physical punishment that makes his hand bleed and leaves him permanent scars, for weeks, at several different points in the book. Umbridge is a sadist.
 
It's been years since I read the books but from what I can remember this happens:
a) Hermione manages to lure Umbridge to the Forbidden forest. After they run into the herd of centaurs and Umbridge insults them they drag her away.
b) Later on Dumbledore rescues her and she has to recover in the hospital wing. There's also a scene that's meant to be comedic where Ron scares the shit out of her by imitating the sound of hoofbeats and Harry and Hermione (?) laugh at it.

I.e. here's no way that someone like Rowling, even if she is literally TERF Hitler, would include a scene in a children's book where a woman gets raped and turn that into a joke. It also wouldn't make sense from a character perspective because Hermione isn't the type of person who'd let someone get sexually assaulted and later condone Ron joking about it.

@PiSSxShiter is what happens when you mistake fan fiction for reality
 
It's been years since I read the books but from what I can remember this happens:
a) Hermione manages to lure Umbridge to the Forbidden forest. After they run into the herd of centaurs and Umbridge insults them they drag her away.
b) Later on Dumbledore rescues her and she has to recover in the hospital wing. There's also a scene that's meant to be comedic where Ron scares the shit out of her by imitating the sound of hoofbeats and Harry and Hermione (?) laugh at it.

I.e. here's no way that someone like Rowling, even if she is literally TERF Hitler, would include a scene in a children's book where a woman gets raped and turn that into a joke. It also wouldn't make sense from a character perspective because Hermione isn't the type of person who'd let someone get sexually assaulted and later condone Ron joking about it.

@PiSSxShiter is what happens when you mistake fan fiction for reality
There are sensible reasons to think that the centaurs raped Umbridge (in the mythology centaurs are rapists and Umbridge was behaving like a traumatized rape victim). On the other hand, it's reasonable to think that this didn't happen (the centaurs in Harry Potter are dignified and Dumbledore probably wouldn't have allowed a gang of (sapient) rapists to just hang out that close to the school). Rowling isn't Micah "Gretchen Felker-Martin" Martin and isn't itching to include rape scenes to jack off to, if rape does happen in her books she won't dwell on it. It's the height of bad faith to accuse her of including rape in the books because a rape could be interpreted to have happened.

Then again, these are the same people who accused her of antisemitism because she has goblin bankers and they assume that any bankers must be dirty heebs.
 
There are sensible reasons to think that the centaurs raped Umbridge (in the mythology centaurs are rapists and Umbridge was behaving like a traumatized rape victim). On the other hand, it's reasonable to think that this didn't happen (the centaurs in Harry Potter are dignified and Dumbledore probably wouldn't have allowed a gang of (sapient) rapists to just hang out that close to the school).
I think this is one of those unfortunate interpretations, largely borne out of a completely mean-spirited reading of the text by people specifically looking for something to get angry at and criticise it for.

Yes, centaurs in Greek mythology were rapists. Here's the thing, though. Pretty much everyone in Greek mythology was a rapist. All the gods (except for Based Ares), all the heroes, that was just a thing back then.

However, since then centaurs have been depicted in this kind of 'noble savage' archetype, where they're kind, gentle, in tune with nature and protective of their forests. Hippie horse-men essentially. There are centaurs in the Narnia books and they're overwhelmingly shown to be on the side of good and those books were written long before Harry Potter. Centaurs in Dungeons and Dragons are similarly represented.

The whole 'centaurs are rapists' thing has really diluted over time and, to be honest, the only place you see that trope now is in specifically dark fantasy - Warhammer, for example, has centigors who are explicitly depicted as evil creatures of Chaos and who are implied (though never openly stated, I note) to be rapists.
 
Rowling is a battered wife who spent years being abused by her shitty ex husband, which of course, influenced her opinion on troons because she can see what an agp really is immediately on account of her experience with shit men.

Anyone who thinks she'd write a female villain character being raped and then play it off as a giggle, especially after what she'd been through irl, was clearly dropped on their head as an infant.
 
So what I'm getting is: she posted one comment about how the Nazi's primary targets weren't troon books and now she's labelled a Holocaust denier? The Jews ain't shit, but I remember that TikTok of that Jewess who pointed out how troons/non-binary people can make even the Holocaust about them.

I have to wonder what transifesto could have been made in the 1930s, and what "trans healthcare" was there, at least as what modern libs define it as? In hindsight, J.K Rowling should've just kept her mouth shut since the troon movement was watching her under a microscope and just waiting for any perceived fuckup. I do love how this is showing yet again just how sexist and misogynistic all the troons and their handmaidens are. I've seen some comments calling Rowling things they would never say to a complacent female handmaiden.

Anyways, IDK what "right-wing" groups Rowling's money funds and why being labelled "right-wing" is inherently bad, but remember when BLM, that very liberal organization that was supposed to help the African-American community, instead used its funding to buy million-dollar mansions?
lib cope.png
 
Yeah, look at all these right-wing causes she funds. What an evil bitch. 🙄
She pledged 70k to this fundraiser regarding the legal definition of "woman". I'm sure this is right wing to these people.
But what happens if you ask them "Really? What causes? Source?". I bet all they will answer is "Do your own research/emotional labor/link to Contrapoint's retarded 2 hour JKR video".
 
I love how Rowling had a few minor issues with the trannies, which caused them to go so mask off they ended up making those minor issues into major ones and exposing just how much worse the issues were than she thought.

And now she's basically a trannie bashing internet shitlord who's very existence makes them seethe and mald. They singlehandedly did more than anything else to forge the sword with which JK is now poking at them.
 
Back