Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Congrats on your thread making it to 7M views, pig! 🎉🎈🙌

Over at the Forrems, we've been raising this hog since he was a mere piglet but we knew one day he'd have to be released into the wild. It's incredibly heartwarming to see how well he's done 🥺
We thank the Forrems for their hard work in bringing this hog to full (very full) size. I'll never have beef with you fine folks.

Like Troons, anyone who has had anything to do with pikies in real life soon realizes that all of the alleged “phobia” is justified.

Although it would be hilarious if OnA members arranged a conspiracy of Troons and Pikies to rent Fatrick’s AirBnB and work together to make it unrentable.

The Pikies stripping the fittings, wiring, pipes for scrap metal, chopping up the internal doors for firewood, and the Troons doing a tranch on the property and leaving a suicide victim dangling in the bathroom should ensure that no one would ever want to stay again.

Edited for Null’s approval.
I thought Pikies were gypsies (as in Romani) not Irish but I might be confused.
 
It would be funny if someone from the OnA forums booked the airbnb and brought with them a putty knife, plaster, and a tin of sardines, and then punched out a small hole in the wall in a hard to see, out of the way location, then placed the open tin of sardines in the wall, and then plastered the hole up.

Please do have fun.
 
OnA guys found Patrick's Airbnb
dc19366b3d1c.png
 
If the city of Milwaukee obtains his camera footage
Pat's about to take those camera's swimming in Mexico if you know what I mean.

Seems Bitchtits the Wonder Pig is back to his old ways and "exposing" the dastardly plot to frame him for sending dozens of NOCHILD-ENJOY-EXPLODING emails to local schools
He did this, he's acting out again. Probably used proton mail.

I’m just askin’ questions here, but doesn’t this happen every time he gets his shit pushed in?
Yes child.

fat lying pig is a fat lying pig.png

This shit is the most fake nerd pleb take of all time. Everyone sympathizes with Magneto, that's literally the entire point of his character. The opening of the first film is of Eric manifesting his mutant powers in Auschwitz as a little boy when they send his mom to the gas chambers, does Pat think that scene doesn't illicit sympathy in people who voted for Trump or something? Actually, I just answered my own question.
 
Vandalizing the ha' hovel is gay. Piggy vandalizing his own property, and releasing the security camera video showing him in flagrante delicto is rib bruising. The meta-bit is to get Piggy to step on rakes. Owen A Forrems knows this. He doesn't need ideas about damaging the ha' hovel.

This one is so obvious. Owen A Forrems could request a reservation, be very polite but make sure the pfp is of a woman wearing a MAGA hat. "I'll be in town for the convention..." I'd bet that a series of requests for the half of the ha' hovel 'for the convention' would be a good bit. Patso would be apoplectic. Of course, no Kiwi should do this.

How stupid is Nikki to allow Patso to reply to the reviews? She knows how he is. She has to deal with the pizza places and all the other people that Patso would antagonize. Yet here Piggy is, oinking at reviewers. She isn't called Dumbo just because of her massive flappy ears.

Speaking of the RNC convention, can we expect some video of Piggy in his pink here-to-welp shirt protesting somehow? Slattern Nikki in her they're trying to kill us hoodie? Maybe an arrest for disorderly conduct? It is like God Himself is trying to give Patso every opportunity to win a Julay.
 
I thought Pikies were gypsies (as in Romani) not Irish but I might be confused.
Pikies are Irish gypsies.
One is supposed to call them Travellers, or the Travelling community.
They claim to be descended from the original inhabitants of Ireland, prior to the Celtic population, but that is complete lies and bullshit.
They are genetically indistinguishable.

They are not Romani, and Pikie is not used to refer to Romani.

Tinkers has been used to refer to both, but that was apparently due to both groups once having made a living by repairing pots and pans as they travelled.

Pikey can also mean a resident of a council estate, but this is only in certain British towns.
 
This must be a similar situation? @AnOminous , don't you know these things? Your opinion, please.
While you usually can't sue a car dealer for selling you a bad car as-is, there's still a duty to disclose such issues, or at least to disclose that they haven't even checked. However, if they know that the car is actually dangerous in its current condition and don't disclose that, and someone suffers harm as a result, then they've committed both fraud and negligence. Obviously if they gave a warranty, they may be in breach of that as well, but I'm assuming as-is.

At least some states impose strict liability in such circumstances, that is, the seller would be responsible for whatever happened as a result of the failure to disclose, whether that's just the car breaking down or it results in physical harm or even death to one or more people.

Even in others that don't explicitly do that, negligence that causes harm can still result in civil liability but you might have a different standard to prove proximate cause. Proximate cause requires both that the harm wouldn't have occurred without the negligent act ("but for"), and that the harm was close enough and foreseeable to the negligent actor (legally proximate).

There are entire multivolume treatises on this and I could sperg about it for a long, long time, but I'll just give a simple example. If you were texting while driving and rear-ended someone because you were distracted, this would be clear-cut proximate cause and you'd be liable for whatever harm resulted. If you were doing exactly the same thing, but instead, you kicked up a pebble which then bounced into someone's windshield, they panicked and swerved around before crashing their own car, then there was a 50 car pileup as a result, and as a result, an ambulance couldn't get to an emergency call and someone died, you might be liable for the windshield and maybe even the resulting crash, but the likelihood drops rapidly as you get further down the chain of events. You would be very unlikely to be liable for the person whose emergency call got missed because the causation is so remote.

So for instance if you knew the brakes on a car were bad and fraudulently sold it anyway, you might be liable for something directly as a result of the brakes being bad if you knowingly didn't disclose its state. This would probably be civil liability and the actual buyer would share some of the blame for not checking it himself, especially as to someone he rear-ended.

Now, the negligence could be so extreme as to be criminal. For instance, if you knew the car was literally a firebomb on four wheels and would probably explode into flame on the drive home and sold it anyway, killing everyone in it, this would probably be an actual crime, depending on the circumstances, anything from criminal negligence to murder under a depraved heart theory, i.e. acts so likely to result in death that they effectively amount to a homicide such as randomly shooting into a crowd.

Incidentally, I think it's a bit of a stretch in this case, especially considering most of the "swattings" are either made up bullshit, just a phone call, or otherwise not "swattings." Pat's a liar but that doesn't make his house an actual deathtrap (except for the basement of course).

Disclosure, while I wrote this off the top of my head, I fact checked the first three paragraphs with Bing AI just to make sure I hadn't fucked anything obvious up. The only thing I changed was adding the brief second paragraph about strict liability since I hadn't known that. Also having mentioned that I strongly suggest not using Bing AI (or any other currently in existence) for anything legal unless you already know it or check the sources it uses scrupulously. It's generally pretty good for basic concepts, but absolutely terrible at the details that contain the Devil, and prone to flat-out make cases up that are properly BlueBook formatted but don't even exist or, if they do, say what the bot says they do.
 
Last edited:
Just remember to make your posts that start with "it would be funny if someone" instead start with "it would be funny if someone from the OnA forums". Thank you
When is the internet tough guys forum be getting it's own Sneedchat category/chat so we can Patpost to all our hear desires tho?
 
Last edited:
pretty much, I wish people would realize its better to fuck with him rather then trying to completely get rid of him. you cant get rid of somebody who weaponizes every little thing that happens to him, so you just have to bleed them dry
If he wants to keep his comfy lifestyle and stop living off his wife
Maybe he can try getting a job
I heard McDs is always looking, he can meet as many childs as he wants
 
Definitely disagreeing on your assessment of probability there. In a room of 23 people, the chances of two people having the exact same birthday as each other, a 1 in 365 chance, is ~50%.
This incidentally makes a great bar bet in a room with 24 or more people in it if you can get a sucker to take even money on it (and the people will cooperate). The more people, the bigger a sucker they are.
 
Back