Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I agree. I saw a woman thirstposting in a chat last night that was related to what the chat was about. It was cringey and I got second hand embarrassment from her, but at least she kept it in an area related to her interest. Men, on the other hand, will just treat the entire Internet like a dog treats a carpet, and shit and piss all over it everywhere with their retarded coomer faggotry. I think it's one of the reasons they hated Tumblr at it's peak so much. Women could post retarded sexual fantasies there about whatever weird interest they had without moids telling them HURR HURR TITS OR GTFO or harassing them to no end. You see it in husbando threads on 4chan too, moids hate those and always try to rationalize it's a bunch of faggots posting instead of women.

Men hate when women act even a percentage of gross as them.
I remember during the 2020 election, the coomers were memeing “Mama Tulsi” because she happened to be one of the more attractive politicians. Barely any bothered to actually look at her stances because they were too distracted by the coom
24A8F66B-899D-49E8-B180-917C7C962102.jpegC02B8ED2-27D3-4D25-B934-63E00C64D600.jpeg
 
I remember during the 2020 election, the coomers were memeing “Mama Tulsi” because she happened to be one of the more attractive politicians. Barely any bothered to actually look at her stances because they were too distracted by the coom
View attachment 5827245View attachment 5827246
Oh god, I remember that too. It was so disgusting. If she had been ugly, they'd shit all over her for that. If she's attractive, they can't keep their dicks in their pants.
 
Oh god, I remember that too. It was so disgusting. If she had been ugly, they'd shit all over her for that. If she's attractive, they can't keep their dicks in their pants.
Not that I agree with or even like all women in politics, but I do think women get unnecessarily judged a lot based on looks when in politics.
  • Older woman = hag, and likely to be anti fun
  • Younger woman = dumb and inexperienced
  • Attractive woman = coombait
  • Ugly woman = not sexy enough and likely a single cat lady
It goes as far as style of dress too
  • Showing a tad bit of cleavage = trashy and ruining the sanctity of government
  • Pantsuit = girlboss that shouldn’t be taken seriously
  • Too form fitting = trashy and ruining the sanctity of government
  • Too baggy or shapeless = no sex appeal and not embracing femininity
  • Too bright = attention whore
  • Too plain = femenazi
Meanwhile, male politicians don’t get nearly this much scrutiny over their looks
 
I remember during the 2020 election, the coomers were memeing “Mama Tulsi” because she happened to be one of the more attractive politicians. Barely any bothered to actually look at her stances because they were too distracted by the coom
Tulsi Gabbard was the only candidate in the 2020 democratic primary who was willing to speak even a word about foreign policy in the haze of myopic TDS fearmongering. For doing so, she was excommunicated from her party, which 15 years prior had pretended to be disgusted with military interventionalism. Portraying her popularity as entirely contingent on her looks seems blatantly misogynistic to me.
 
I know I'm late to this and the conversation about it was incredibly overdone to death. But there's something funny about moids claiming that they "reclaimed" Ken from the Barbie movie and the whole movie while making fun of how Barbie, the dumb femoid bitch she is, didn't consider how Ken and other Kens didn't like to be treated like sub-humans and objects to her. You'd think a movie with the most basic "babby's first movie to empathy and reflecting" would make moids able to think and come to the conclusion of "Hmmm is this how women feel when they're still reduced to sub-humans and objects? This is fucked" but instead they did the meme of coming to the most exaggerated conclusion of "Feminazi bitches want to enslave me and all other men!" and in typical moid fashion made everything about themselves, not understanding how Ken taking actions against being reduced to an object/sub-human mirrors is no different than women having to do this constantly.

I don't give a singular fuck about Ethan Klein and find him boring but this is pretty funny:


View attachment 5825708

Some great moid logic there 👏

(Apologies to the mods if this post fucks up - I am sick as fuck and phone posting badly. Please forgive my retardation)
First of all Fresh and Fit calling themselves as marriage gatekeepers is super funny given that moids like them 10-15 years ago
were probably warning men about those ICKY WOMEN trying to tie them down in a marriage and ruin them. Secondly,
they should be the last people judging women's looks when Myron is one step away from looking like a bisexual nigger
from Atlanta.

Also I hate giving Ethan a win, when he really is no better at treating his wife, given that without any shame or issue
has no problem inviting OF chicks like Belle Delphine into his podcast, ogling at them in front of his wife and following
their OF content, despite being married and having kids. It was really sad to see Hila try to replicate the fashion choices
these OF chicks wore to try to appease her husband somehow.
but when the SA in the same vein as Keanu Reeves, Terry Crews, &c. became known,
Remember how Terry Crews was Reddit's favorite hecking wholesome buff niggo until he spoke out about porn addiction being actually a very real issue that almost destroyed his own marriage and how pornography is harmful? Because the worst sin for Reddit is criticizing porn and saying porn industry isn't hecking wholesome.

I remember during the 2020 election, the coomers were memeing “Mama Tulsi” because she happened to be one of the more attractive politicians. Barely any bothered to actually look at her stances because they were too distracted by the coom
View attachment 5827245View attachment 5827246
I want to say Tulsi didn't had it that bad (it's still gross), compared to someone like Sarah Palin, where sexualization
of her was so giant that they even made an adult parody of her.
1710784712988.png
I dunno, I think there's a big difference when women's reaction to a shitty male politician is them calling him kindergarten names (with that one exception where that one woman comedian did a photoshoot with Trump's beheaded fake head) and men's reaction to female politician is to make adult parodies of her or write a biblically long fanfiction about how much they want to correctively rape that female politician and put her in" her place". But only one of them is treated with "Hey, calm down buddy" (Hint: It's not men's reaction).
 
Last edited:
Portraying her popularity as entirely contingent on her looks seems blatantly misogynistic to me.
I never claimed to do so, but more often than not, I saw men making sexualized comments about her more than her policies, or they’d combine the two (if they did mention any policy). It’s not bad that people do find her attractive, but it’s bad when it’s men (I should say moids) reduce a woman to her looks.
 
I know I'm late to this and the conversation about it was incredibly overdone to death. But there's something funny about moids claiming that they "reclaimed" Ken from the Barbie movie and the whole movie while making fun of how Barbie, the dumb femoid bitch she is, didn't consider how Ken and other Kens didn't like to be treated like sub-humans and objects to her. You'd think a movie with the most basic "babby's first movie to empathy and reflecting" would make moids able to think and come to the conclusion of "Hmmm is this how women feel when they're still reduced to sub-humans and objects? This is fucked" but instead they did the meme of coming to the most exaggerated conclusion of "Feminazi bitches want to enslave me and all other men!" and in typical moid fashion made everything about themselves, not understanding how Ken taking actions against being reduced to an object/sub-human mirrors is no different than women having to do this constantly.
TBF the messaging of Barbie was pretty scrambled. But people identifying with Ken or thinking Barbie is too mean-spirited are retards.
 
TBF the messaging of Barbie was pretty scrambled. But people identifying with Ken or thinking Barbie is too mean-spirited are retards.
I think a lot of people missed that it was supposed to be satire on ways women are treated in real life, but sadly, people aren’t as good at actually picking out satire. Both the matriarchy and the patriarchy in Barbieland were so over the top that both looked ridiculous. I think the ending could’ve been touched up a bit, but overall, I enjoyed the movie.
 
I think a lot of people missed that it was supposed to be satire on ways women are treated in real life, but sadly, people aren’t as good at actually picking out satire. Both the matriarchy and the patriarchy in Barbieland were so over the top that both looked ridiculous. I think the ending could’ve been touched up a bit, but overall, I enjoyed the movie.
Which is why it's beyond me that so-called conservatives were utterly buck broken by this movie when they weren't busy saying how they reclaimed Ken or some shit. The satire was so on nose, it reminded me of Starship Troopers, a 90s movie that recently resurged in popularity thanks to Helldivers 2, is so over the top with its satire and it's clear as day it's dunking on American politics and military, but people had no issue realizing it was satire, aside from few exceptional individuals.

The way conservatives/right wing grifters described this movie as some vile misandrist hit piece that shames men, you'd think the plot is about Andrea Dworkin somehow ending up in Barbieland where she teaches Barbies the way of oppressing moids and forces Kens to be part of a painful samsara cycle where they feel nothing but endless torment due to the sin of being a man, not a silly "Haha look how over the top both of these systems are and clearly it's unfair for people to be part of either these because only one party reaps the benefits" along with actually pointing out the issues women have to deal with.
 
Which is why it's beyond me that so-called conservatives were utterly buck broken by this movie when they weren't busy saying how they reclaimed Ken or some shit. The satire was so on nose, it reminded me of Starship Troopers, a 90s movie that recently resurged in popularity thanks to Helldivers 2, is so over the top with its satire and it's clear as day it's dunking on American politics and military, but people had no issue realizing it was satire, aside from few exceptional individuals.

The way conservatives/right wing grifters described this movie as some vile misandrist hit piece that shames men, you'd think the plot is about Andrea Dworkin somehow ending up in Barbieland where she teaches Barbies the way of oppressing moids and forces Kens to be part of a painful samsara cycle where they feel nothing but endless torment due to the sin of being a man, not a silly "Haha look how over the top both of these systems are and clearly it's unfair for people to be part of either these because only one party reaps the benefits" along with actually pointing out the issues women have to deal with.
image_2024-03-18_211042076.png
H. L. Mencken
 
The satire was so on nose, it reminded me of Starship Troopers, a 90s movie that recently resurged in popularity thanks to Helldivers 2, is so over the top with its satire and it's clear as day it's dunking on American politics and military, but people had no issue realizing it was satire, aside from few exceptional individuals.
It's not that people* don't understand that it's supposed to be satire but rather that either Verhoeven failed at satire in a way that it neuters his own point or that people just disagree with his original point entirely.

"I made a soyjak satire of your thing therefore you can't like it anymore."

*I just assumed that "few exceptional individuals" were the right-wing moids who like ST's politics as if it weren't a satire
 
Last edited:
It's not that people don't understand that it's supposed to be satire (I assume we're talking about the same people here) but rather that either Verhoeven failed at satire in a way that it neuters his own point or that people just disagree with his original point entirely.

"I made a soyjak satire of your thing therefore you can't like it anymore."
but she was saying that most people did in fact accept it as satire; knowing some Dutch[?] pervert hates a beloved scifi author doesn't make the fan of the author into a mere puppet either way. the recognition stands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
Hey ladies, guess what cancer involves the highest rates of divorce, specifically from the male in the relationship initiating it?

Cervical cancer.

Women diagnosed with cancer of the cervix have an over 40% higher chance of being divorced by their spouse. I hear doctor’s acting perplexed by this, when the reason is so fucking obvious: one of the main symptoms of cervical cancer is painful intercourse. Women with this cancer don’t want/can’t have penetrative sex due to tumors.

Some men are so truly vile that they file for divorce from their spouses simply because their brains are more focused on fucking than caring for their supposed loved one.
Lol remember Newt Gingrich? He divorced his first wife because she got cancer and his second wife because she got multiple sclerosis. He also cheated on his second wife DURING the Lewinsky scandal. Which is a whole other can of man hate worms I'm not gonna dive into right now.

Women doing regular tasks
Moids: how can I make this into a fetish?

Moids really need to be shamed more often for being perverts. For some reason, guys just are super open about what they find hot online, and think everyone needs to know what gets them off.
Moids should be treated like cattle or horses. The vast majority castrated and very few allowed to stay intact while separated from society and subjected to careful expert handling. We know that there's an enormous behavioral difference between a gelding and a stallion, it would vastly decrease all the ills of human society like crime and war.


The funniest part is that the guys posting about what they find hot online rarely look handsome themselves. Also, they’re the first to announce when a woman isn’t sexy, even if her job isn’t tied to sex appeal. Moids have this expectation of women to look like the Instagram models, influencers, and celebrities in real life, and then get surprised when women just look normal. Always remember though: the guy calling you ugly, mid, or plain behind a computer screen is most likely uglier than you are.
Lol I'm in a kf-adjacent telegram chat constantly intruded on by the lovely individual Matt Schimmel (tldr: a 30 year old man who larps as an emo wolf otherkin tranny) and he constantly seethes at my existence, it's like he just throws punches into the air (fat, ugly, poor, secretly a tranny, etc.) and hopes one lands while begging me to dox myself so he can find out my insecurities to bully me with. (Edit: I forgot he's also threatened to sue me and report me to the FBI for laughing at him lmao)

Meanwhile he looks like tranny Johnny Ramone in clown makeup.

Yesterday he spent over 12 hours chimping out at me (culminating in begging to pay $150 to have me banned from the chat when I hadn't been online for like 8 hours :story:) because I poked fun at him for wearing a garish sonic hoodie on a date and watching videos of himself to seethe at his ex gf at like 2 am.

This is the date photo he posted of himself in said hoodie.

IMG_20240318_043318_577.jpg
 
Last edited:
Which is why it's beyond me that so-called conservatives were utterly buck broken by this movie when they weren't busy saying how they reclaimed Ken or some shit. The satire was so on nose, it reminded me of Starship Troopers, a 90s movie that recently resurged in popularity thanks to Helldivers 2, is so over the top with its satire and it's clear as day it's dunking on American politics and military, but people had no issue realizing it was satire, aside from few exceptional individuals.

The way conservatives/right wing grifters described this movie as some vile misandrist hit piece that shames men, you'd think the plot is about Andrea Dworkin somehow ending up in Barbieland where she teaches Barbies the way of oppressing moids and forces Kens to be part of a painful samsara cycle where they feel nothing but endless torment due to the sin of being a man, not a silly "Haha look how over the top both of these systems are and clearly it's unfair for people to be part of either these because only one party reaps the benefits" along with actually pointing out the issues women have to deal with.
I kind of blame the shitty ending for people not understanding the themes. The Kens are actually unhappy with responsibility and decision-making, and are happy to go back to being nothing but eye candy for the Barbies. They are relieved when the Barbies smugly say that the Kens will maybe earn some right to vote, sometimes. This is, in fact, very funny. But it contradicts the themes the movie had previously set up (Barbie learning about feminism/equality/the real world, Ken learning about misogyny, the Kens rising up and destroying Barbieland because they're trying to imitate misogyny). If the Kens had peacefully protested (hahaha) and/or the Barbies had been willing to allow them representation in government and equal work opportunities, it would have come through clearer. Alas.

I saw the movie with a guy friend of mine and he wasn't, like seething, but he thought it was too mean-spirited. This after women have been lambasted by male-centric films, TV, books, and other media since the advent of the written word. Let me have my funny plastic doll movie where the woman is a little mean to the man.
 
Men desperately trying to make "femcels" a thing is so funny. I keep seeing the word more and more on Twitter and social media, of course it's always referring to women who point out misogyny or are feminists.

Men are really trying to equate women who hate men for oppressing us for all of human history and for being our biggest natural predators as the same as incels who hate women for not having sex with them. They are trying so hard to turn it into "Nah you aren't actually mad that men are violent and horrible to women and want to take women's rights away again, you're just mad you can't GET DICK!" It's so delusional. Any woman can pick up her phone and have a man come over for sex within 10 minutes. Women will never be involuntary celibate, sorry. It's only ever voluntary and men just really can't understand not revolving your entire life around sex. Even men who are sympathetic to women in some ways don't understand that women don't prioritize sex the same way men do.
 
Men desperately trying to make "femcels" a thing is so funny. I keep seeing the word more and more on Twitter and social media, of course it's always referring to women who point out misogyny or are feminists.
Men accusing women of being "femcels" on Twitter is really just men accusing women of being lonely cat ladies with a fresh coat of paint.
 
It's only ever voluntary and men just really can't understand not revolving your entire life around sex. Even men who are sympathetic to women in some ways don't understand that women don't prioritize sex the same way men do
My only note on this is that I do feel like my life revolves around sex and that I prioritize and value it waaaaaay more than men do. I want good sex with someone that I have a reciprocal love and trust bond with. I couldn't be in a relationship without that as part of a fundamental block.
If I don't want to have sex with someone I'm in a relationship with (barring a medical reason like being sick/postpartum) then I'm probably not in a good relationship.

This why I have zero interest in dudes that thinks of sex as "put dick in hole until coom". If they want a fleshlight, they can go buy one.
 
Why do moids get so butthurt over women participating in a gossip site? They should actually be less surprised of the amount of women in this forum because, if we’re using stereotypes, women should technically make up a decent amount of the userbase.
 
Last edited:
Why do moids get so butthurt over women participating in a gossip site? They should actually be less surprised of the amount of women in this forum because, because if we’re using stereotypes, women should technically make up a decent amount of the userbase.
It's inconceivable that women can exist and speak freely on the internet. It breaks their brains.

They're so used to women hiding themselves (by never mentioning anything that could identify one as female) or they're used to us being too frightened to say anything that disrupts the narrative.

They don't have the janny summoning power they have on Reddit or the social conditions created by 4chan (400 replies of "tits or gtfo" if you said anything female coded, or you'd just get called a fag 🙄)
 
Back