Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    462
to be fair i'd checked out Hardins site before and he's listed in Washington DC so i assumed that's here he was based. Florida had confused me too, i just assumed josh wanted to meet the dribbling retard face to face and get an autograph.
Mr. Hardin's Pro Hac Vice admission in November doesn't mention Florida at all or the 11th Circuit
2024-03-20_17-02.png
 
View attachment 5834216

You know, I get the feeling the judge didn't appreciate just being ignored by Russell.

I'll bet there are plenty of women on Instagram and other social media sites that wish Russell ignored them as much as he ignored his court case.

Thanks for the notifying. Here's the doc (for everyone else):
View attachment 5834438
View attachment 5834439
View attachment 5834440

It will now.

Can we change the name from a "motion to reconsider" to a "writ of habeas autismus", because that's what it reads like.
 
I'll bet there are plenty of women on Instagram and other social media sites that wish Russell ignored them as much as he ignored his court case.



Can we change the name from a "motion to reconsider" to a "writ of habeas autismus", because that's what it reads like.
I much prefer Motion for Idiota ignosce
 
If the SCOTUS doesn't grant Cert I am all in favor of the Chaos option. Filing the exact same motion to dismiss as was filed in the 10th circuit and forcing the 11th circuit to create a circuit split.
I'm fairly certain the "law of the case" doctrine would bar this tactic. Even though it's in a new Circuit, the law applied to the case thus far is binding. This is the type of "neat trick" that federal courts do not like to entertain.
 
I'm fairly certain the "law of the case" doctrine would bar this tactic. Even though it's in a new Circuit, the law applied to the case thus far is binding. This is the type of "neat trick" that federal courts do not like to entertain.
The problem with this theory is there is no case. This case was dismissed in its entirety under Rule 12b(6) for failure to the state a claim. Nothing was adjudicated. The 10th circuit court reversed the 12b(6) motion for contributory copyright infringement only. The entire record of the proceedings is not on the case itself. Its on whether or not there is a case to begin with. All the 10th circuit did was say Greer had a case. But the 10th circuits interpretation of the Federal Rules are their own.

The enabling act of 1934 vest authority to interpret the Rules of Civil Procedure solely within the Supreme Court. Absent clear guidance from the SCOTUS, the Circuit courts act on their own to interpret the rules in their own jurisdiction within the confines of existing SCOTUS precedents. The 10th circuits ruling, while persuasive to how the 11th should interpret the rules, is not binding.
 
Seems likely (as other have said) he already had a different submission typed out for some other motion/response, and quickly repurposed it for this. Explains why more than half of it seems tangential to the matter at hand, above and beyond Russ' usual ramblings.
My suspicion is he was expecting to have to deal with being scolded for missing the response filing deadlines. Claiming "excusable negligence" for a common Pro Se Fuck Up. "So sorry. I'm just a retard who doesn't know better. You have to treat me Special! Teacher says so." And the court would just let him file his long winded derranged responses.

But he was not expecting the Court to just kick the whole thing to Florida. That has him in a complete panic. He's cutting and pasting furiously. Throwing in all caps wailings of plights.

And what he never gets in all of this is HE IS THE FUCKING PLAINTIFF! He's pleading a Defense for his idiocy. His idiocy has a remedy. Hire a fucking Lawyer. He's not the one being forced into the courtroom. The Court doesn't have to take pity on the poor retard, because the retard is the one wasting the courts time.
 
But he was not expecting the Court to just kick the whole thing to Florida. That has him in a complete panic. He's cutting and pasting furiously. Throwing in all caps wailings of plights.
My question is why is he freaking out, why does he want it to stay in Utah for? Aside from perhaps forcing him to go all the way to florida to fight in court, what are the advantages now when he was already living outside of the state he was suing in?
 
Is Russel employed? I can’t imagine what it’s like trying to manage him. So much about this guy absolutely baffles me.
He works, haven’t paid attention to if he’s currently employed, but one of the funniest stories about him involves him doing a janitor shift in a full suit then riding a bus for hours to meet a hooker for a romantic rendezvous.
Not to shill the fallen lawsplainer but this stream is definitely gold. Just all the greer streams in general really
 
Back