RCMP set to begin mandatory breathalyzers for drivers pulled over in Saskatchewan - Anyone pulled over for a traffic violation such as speeding, or broken taillights will now be required to take a breathalyzer.

Article (Saskatoon Star Phoenix)
Archive

247768983-0306_nb_rcmp_mbs_005-w.jpg

Saskatchewan RCMP are going to start using their breathalyzers every time they pull someone over.

The police service announced Thursday in a media release that effective April 1, officers will begin checking all drivers for alcohol during traffic stops.

The policy builds on changes introduced to the federal Criminal Code in 2018, which gave police the authority to require breath samples from drivers without having to first prove a reasonable suspicion of impairment.

“It goes without saying that someone’s ability to mask their impairment should not be the determining factor if someone gets home safely to their family each night,” RCMP Supt. Grant St. Germaine said in the release.

The release states that officers will not be pulling drivers over for the sole purpose of checking them for impairment. Rather, the policy would see drivers asked to provide a breath sample when pulled over for other potential violations, such as speeding, careless driving or malfunctioning brake lights.

The policy is reportedly meant to help address Saskatchewan’s high rates of impaired driving; RCMP in the province laid over 1700 impaired driving charges in 2023, and alcohol was involved in over one-third of all fatal collisions, the release stated.

A breathalyzer test generally takes about 90 seconds. Drivers who refuse to provide a breath sample can face a criminal charge, with potential penalties including suspension of their driver’s licence, vehicle impoundment, demerit points on their driving record and fines.

The RCMP have announced that the policy of demanding roadside breath tests in the course of all traffic stops will continue on “an on-going basis.” The Regina Police Service previously announced its officers would be checking for alcohol during all routine traffic stops for the month of March.

Saskatchewan courts have previously ruled mandatory alcohol screening of drivers is permissible under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
 
I'm just waiting for the blowback when too many Chugs get popped
That's almost certainly the intent of this policy, being able to breathalyze natives while dodging the racism card. "Nothing personal, we do this to everyone."
Wikipedia gives the population as 11% First Nations, and I'm sure this is a "DESPITE..." thing when it comes to drunk driving rates.
 
I'm just waiting for the blowback when too many Chugs get popped and their chief cries racism and residential schooling trauma, or whatever bullshit excuse they use these days to not be fucktards, and the policy eventually gets dropped.
Nah, they'll just stop policing high FN areas entirely. Or rather, resume not policing those areas. Allowing minority areas to fall into complete lawlessness is the new hotness in the west.
 
Don't make excuses for drunk driving, it's not a hill worth dying on.

Yes it is, our world is so cucked because everyone decided giving away our rights was worth it to stop anyone feeling scared or uncomfortable ever

You might walk out tomorrow and be hit by a drink driver, someone might cough in your face with some lethal disease, you might just randomly have a massive heart attack so stop caring so much and actually live your life freely
 
Saskatchewan RCMP are going to start using their breathalyzers every time they pull someone over
No they're not. You need probable cause to do that. You're going to get sued for demanding a breath sample for speeding or a fucky tail light and threatening any kind of legal consequences for refusing. Theres also the whole you're going to get sued the instant you try this with a native or muslim driver. Muslims aren't supposed to be drinking at all so they'll be screaming hate crime the moment the cop implies they have been by doing this and natives, especially in that province are notorious drunks who are constantly drunk driving (and probably the real reason this is supposedly going to happen to begin with, hence 'everyone' gets tested regardless) will sue just as quickly and scream racial profiling them as 'drunken natives' just for asking for the sample regardless of the consequences. Everybody else will sue both for lack of probable cause and when they find out there are exceptions for those groups to avoid getting their asses sued off and claim racial discrimination

The policy builds on changes introduced to the federal Criminal Code in 2018, which gave police the authority to require breath samples from drivers without having to first prove a reasonable suspicion of impairment.
No it doesn't. You have to have probable cause. This will never be legally enforceable and is going to result in lawsuits and legal challenges as its a blatant charter violation

The release states that officers will not be pulling drivers over for the sole purpose of checking them for impairment. Rather, the policy would see drivers asked to provide a breath sample when pulled over for other potential violations, such as speeding, careless driving or malfunctioning brake lights.
So you're admitting you're testing people for no legitimate reason on a stop that has nothing whatsoever to do with alcohol like a broken light. Enjoy your lawsuit

A breathalyzer test generally takes about 90 seconds. Drivers who refuse to provide a breath sample can face a criminal charge, with potential penalties including suspension of their driver’s licence, vehicle impoundment, demerit points on their driving record and fines.
No they can't. Not without cause to demand that sample in the first place

Saskatchewan courts have previously ruled mandatory alcohol screening of drivers is permissible under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Which is irrelevant because provincial courts do not dictate what is legal under the charter, federal courts do and the supreme court and this is a clear violation of the charter because by their own admission there is no basis for demanding the sample in the first place. Legally this is no different than pulling you over demanding to search your vehicle without cause and then threatening to arrest you for refusing
 
Legally this is no different than pulling you over demanding to search your vehicle without cause and then threatening to arrest you for refusing
This is why regardless of personal opinions about weed it should be federally legalized. "I smell marijuana" is burger code for "let's waste 20 minutes of your time fishing because I'm on the clock for it."
 
No it doesn't. You have to have probable cause. This will never be legally enforceable and is going to result in lawsuits and legal challenges as its a blatant charter violation

IANAL but I believe the apparatchiks pushing this "the law is settled" talking points are taking specific case law court decisions permitting mandatory and arbitrary breathalyzer demands of anyone entrapped in police RIDE program checkpoints can be more broadly interpreted as a judicial decree to demand breath samples from everyone all the time for no reason other than "I said so".
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PhoBingas
Back