Canada to Incorporate Social Scores in Banking - Canada's Social Credit System

The Canadian banking system is set to be radicalized by open banking framework. Proponents are framing this as a way for banks to easily share information and access user data. The truth of the matter is that this is an opportunity to merge social standings with banking to provide government complete control over our finances.

The organization Open Banking Excellence, a World Bank partner that originated in the UK, claims that it will host all of a bank’s relevant needs in one place. The organization, which has reached 40 countries, aims to “create exceptional platforms and content that promotes knowledge sharing, new thinking and partnerships within the industry – catalysing the adoption of Open Finance and Data for better financial inclusion worldwide.”

“It’s about having that fairer, more inclusive, more open society,” said Helen Child, founder of Open Banking Excellence. Open Society, well, that does sound familiar. Why is there a need for inclusivity and fairness in banking when it should come down to numbers? “It drives financial inclusion,” she added, “It’s democratizing data.”

Data. That will be worth more than gold as we move forward with a cashless society. There is no easier way to control the masses than to control their access to money, their ability to buy, trade, and freely move about. The Canadian Press outlined the true motive in plain sight: “One of the biggest areas of growth is in credit assessments. Under open banking, lenders could directly access an individual’s banking data, so they can look beyond credit scores. Consumers can also use it to build their credit scores, for example, by proving reliable rent payments.”

Looking beyond credit scores equates to determining if a person is fit to participate in the global economy based on their personal views. Look at what happened to Nigel Farage. He never committed a crime or did anything to warrant what many have called the “Farage fiasco.” Nigel was suddenly debanked by Coutts and was unable to access any of his checking or savings accounts. His credit cards were deactivated. He was unable to participate in society without a moment’s notice.

Farage did his due diligence and found that there were countless people who experienced the same financial attack carried out by the banks on behalf of the government.

This is a widespread phenomenon. We saw it happening commonly during COVID lockdowns, where users were not permitted to access places if their digital COVID passports failed. In China, when banks were facing a liquidity crisis, the CCP simply denied depositors the right to access their money and blocked them from physically accessing their banks. The government successfully prevented a bank run. We saw a few celebrities debanked from the system for voicing unpopular opinions without any legal proceedings or crimes committed.

Canada is one of many nations hoping to use unofficial social scores to control the masses. All of these actions are setting the stage for how CBDC will operate, a collective network containing everyone’s personal data and accounts. Governments have already begun debanking individuals and these steps will make it increasingly easier to force the masses to bow down and relinquish all control to the almighty government.

Article Link|Archive
 
Sucks for you Canucks. I hate saying this but your only choice to ever be free from this system is to engage in the most violent and bloody revolution in history. If you decide for whatever reason not to do so, you'll be a permanent serf class, which may still be the end result anyway. I know you won't bother, but this is the only course of action to free yourselves at this point. Trudeau is a tyrant the likes of which not seen since Stalin and Hitler. He's arguably worse than Xi at this point and is just missing the body counts. Either way, I openly say this because I know you'll never do it. After all, you can't spell Canuck without cuck.
Not seen since Stalin and Hitler? Trudeau is a PM past his prime and supports authoritarian-leaning policies but you have to be retarded to conclude that he’s on the level of some of the most tyrannical leaders in history.

His Canadian father was more authoritarian than he was as Pierre brought in the Canadian military to end the October Crisis.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Mango Cobra
It feels redundant to keep having to make "english speaking totalitarian police state race" jokes about CN at this point but here we are once again!
 
At least their prime minister is handsome and nice.
That's actually why one of my teachers voted for him back in 2015, lmfao.
Anyways, can someone explain how the article comes to the conclusion that Canada's incorporating social score/credit? I'm probably just retarded but I don't understand this.
 
This is fear mongering. I'll believe it when I see it.
Same. If you read it, there's nothing about political views or social media being used. It's the same thing they've said for years, about using rent and utility payments to weigh credit scores for giving loans or credit cards.

That can be good or bad. If you don't have a high credit score or a history of credit, paying your other bills on time can help. On the other hand, you can argue it's not the bank or Discover's business if you're late on rent.

That's not to say they won't use social media or who you associate with against you in the future, but this isn't them saying that out loud yet.
 
Getting rid of the penny was the first step. The Canadians are used to getting ripped off depending on rounding so they'll be fine with the financial system being messed with further.
As a Canadian, you sound like a dumbass. If you use a credit or debit, you are charged exactly. If you pay in cash, it either rounds down or rounds up so sometimes you "win" and sometimes you don't. If your purchase ends with 62 cents, you pay 60 cents. 63 cents you give 65 cents cash.

Do I agree with this? Not sure but when they got rid of it, it was because they said it cost more to make than what it is worth. Is this true? Maybe. It doesn't seem unreasonable but I'd have to look into that more.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Grand Wizard Wakka
Do I agree with this? Not sure but when they got rid of it, it was because they said it cost more to make than what it is worth. Is this true? Maybe. It doesn't seem unreasonable but I'd have to look into that more.
Its true, minting costs were in excess of the value of the coin. Same case in the US actually. However, its a bit of a dishonest way of looking at the problem, since pennies aren't used once then lost to the ether - Coins are relatively durable, and even with a penny it only takes a handful of transactions for the coin to have "Made up" its manufacturing cost in transaction value represented. Considering I still have pennies stamped with 70's dating on them, those coin could quite plausibly have been responsible for hundreds of dollars worth of velocity over its lifespan.

People also tend to get the retirement wrong - The penny is still legal tender, if you've got some then merchants are still required to accept them. The mint just isn't making any more, and banks are accepting them but not handing them out. Whenever a bank or government institute gets ahold of them, they get sent off to be destroyed.

The only physical currency I'm aware of that actually makes sense to be retired is the one dollar US bill, as its just too fragile for its denominational level. Even then, its retirement should be to allow it to be replaced with a coin, not just removed from the denomination spread entirely.

“It’s about having that fairer, more inclusive, more open society,” said Helen Child, founder of Open Banking Excellence. Open Society, well, that does sound familiar. Why is there a need for inclusivity and fairness in banking when it should come down to numbers? “It drives financial inclusion,” she added, “It’s democratizing data.”
I find arguments like these hilarious when applied to banking, because its the most double speak shit every contrived. They can try and wash and word it when it comes to social influences, government structures etc, but when it comes to finance and banking, it falls apart completely. The entire premise is based around the idea of making your money more or less valuable (If you cannot use it on certain things, it loses value to you) based on your personal activities. That is the exact opposite of fair and inclusive, which would simply be a dollar is a dollar and can be spent on any thing at any time.

This is fear mongering. I'll believe it when I see it.
You say that, but as a Canadian I'm probably weeks away from being able to be jailed for life for calling someone a Nigger on the Kiwi Farms. This shits light compared to what they already have in motion.
 
Back