Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I recall this being spotlighted as "see! we did something!" by shitgops a few days back. I think just nobody really cares.Somebody snuck it in there and the other demented retards in charge didn't bother to read it.
The prohibition on unapproved flags would only last for the duration of the funding deal, which ends Sept. 30.
For some odd reason the fag-flag ban and its end in a couple of months will somehow be the Orange Man (BAD)'s fault.The fag flag thing is a distraction. From a Bloomberg article about it a few days ago:
The border issue frankly is more of pressing matter then embassies waving LGBT flags or not and that hasn't been solved. It's a minor win (if even that) and nothing more.I recall this being spotlighted as "see! we did something!" by shitgops a few days back. I think just nobody really cares.
no foolingIt's drop of good in a bucket of bad.
Apparently there were 50 amendments about gay flags, and this was the one that they finally gave up on. Props to that one extremely dedicated representative.There's the old 'putting fit white dudes back in military recruitment ads' argument, but I think it has more to do with appeasing governments/populations who are not on board with the butt-stuff. Niger suspended military cooperation a couple weeks ago, they need to keep working arrangements with third world countries in strategically important locations. Associating US embassies with homo lust could affect local opinions. Somebody snuck it in there and the other demented retards in charge didn't bother to read it.
I get them occasionally. most are copper-nickel post-70 halves but i have got a fair amount of silver. since 2019 i have pulled all this silver from my register till:Where are you seeing anyone spend half-dollars?
tbf there probably are some districts where the electorate actually are more concerned about a gay flag then crapping away a trillion dollars on shitApparently there were 50 amendments about gay flags, and this was the one that they finally gave up on. Props to that one extremely dedicated representative.
This is what the gop wants you to thinktbf there probably are some districts where the electorate actually are more concerned about a gay flag then crapping away a trillion dollars on shit
In non-clown world, the courts would tell him that he signed it, he agreed, he has to live with it.And the GOP be working night and day to figure out how they can help Biden repeal it.
View attachment 5846186
nah, there's still a more than a couple of mouth-breathing Greatest Ally's Greatest Ally neocons out there in the voting base who don't care where the money goes as long as some guy maybe isn't sucking a dick as openlyThis is what the gop wants you to think
I'm gonna defend the guy. This is far more amusing than you all seem to realize. It cost almost no time or effort to suggest small amendments and this one is -tiny-. So all he did was make sure to toss it in whenever a new bill was up and just -wait- for people to overlook it.tbf there probably are some districts where the electorate actually are more concerned about a gay flag then crapping away a trillion dollars on shit
Counterpoint: the fed being denied 1.2 trillion dollars is more based than taking away their rainbow flags. All Republicans should be against every spending bill.I'm gonna defend the guy. This is far more amusing than you all seem to realize. It cost almost no time or effort to suggest small amendments and this one is -tiny-. So all he did was make sure to toss it in whenever a new bill was up and just -wait- for people to overlook it.
This was a pet project that now has made an entire administration screech. This man turned an entire government into a lolcow for himself, and -that was the point-.
Him adding an amendment doesn't stop him voting against the bill as a whole. He just has to toss that in, in case it passes anyway. These are not mutually exclusive.Counterpoint: the fed being denied 1.2 trillion dollars is more based than taking away their rainbow flags. All Republicans should be against every spending bill.
Based and called it . It will be brought up to supreme court label goes against free expression.And the GOP be working night and day to figure out how they can help Biden repeal it.
View attachment 5846186
GOP was too busy working on the details to invite Bibi Netanyahoo to speak in front of Congress.The border issue frankly is more of pressing matter then embassies waving LGBT flags or not and that hasn't been solved. It's a minor win (if even that) and nothing more.
It's drop of good in a bucket of bad.
The White House is going to contest it to even if is temporary, guess they want their embassies to be ready for that certain month.
View attachment 5846597
Yep. The Whig Party disintegrated in the early 1850's, and the Republican Party filled the void. I haven't looked too closely into what caused it, but I'm pretty sure people were all "When are you going to do something about the slavery issue instead of just harping on about free markets?"What's going on right now is a dramatic reorganization of the Party System. This has happened a few times in our history. The "Uniparty" will consolidate itself, eventually, into a demented form of its own party, whereas I imagine there will be some kind of more forceful Right-Wing, Isolationist, and populist party to counter it.
They are an unstated reason why being enlightened centrists are a bad idea. I can understand not teaching it because 19th century American history is rather boring talking about having a central bank and how States should interact with the Federal government. The Indian Wars also aren't that interesting to examine on a military level other than to say that logistics win wars and Natives just couldn't wage wars of attrition.Yep. The Whig Party disintegrated in the early 1850's, and the Republican Party filled the void. I haven't looked too closely into what caused it, but I'm pretty sure people were all "When are you going to do something about the slavery issue instead of just harping on about free markets?"