Katy Montgomerie / Colin Hugh Montgomerie / @KatyMontgomerie / @KatysCartoons / completelykaty - Destroyer of Gender Criticals, victim of misogyny, MSPaint cartoonist

1711103703458.png

Today is Colin's 35th birthday (Archive)! To celebrate the occasion, I've updated the OP with some new screencaps from the last few pages of this thread. Thanks to those who provided more funny tweets.

More importantly, however, I managed to dig up that old Facebook page with those infamous padded bra videos which some of you mentioned. Colin never deleted it, so I suspect he's lost access to the account somehow. Initially I was suspicious that they may have been faked -- and so decided against including them in the OP -- but after laying eyes on the page myself am quite confident in their legitimacy. I've added all this, as well as a Twitter thread with more evidence, to a new section at the bottom of the post (alongside some better-quality screenshots, just in case they end up being necessary).

Screenshot 2024-03-22 164020.png


This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.


So, enjoy your 35th Colin! Here's hoping you live the day to its fullest and take some time off to celebrate with your most treasured friends and family!

1711105915263.png

...who am I kidding.
 
Colin is now trying to lecture award-winning professor of biology Richard Dawkins in his own discipline

View attachment 5837471

Love how that last line shows just how much of a sped Colin is. Richard's original statement said exactly the same thing as Colin: that intersex people are not "trans", but somehow Richard is wrong when Colin the crossdresser repeats his assertion.
The paper he is referencing is from 1974. A fifty year old paper. It's been since discovered that XO males are either chimeras or De La Chapelle. Males do not survive with one chromosome.

Here were some responses. People are pushing back. Archive.

He wants Dawkins to get community noted.
Screenshot_20240322-152235_(1).png
"How can you claim this when I clearly say this? You idiotic transphobe."
Screenshot_20240322-152511_(1).png
Someone tried to debunk him. Archive.
Screenshot_20240322-152044_(1).png
Token response:
Screenshot_20240322-150604_(1).png
"Not using pronouns is like not using vowels." Archive.
Screenshot_20240322-153530_(1).png
 
Colin is all but admitting that sex is binary when he says that people with Klinefelters syndrome who claim to be men are not trans. If "intersex" really was a third category outside of male and female then an intersex person who identified as either a man or a woman would be considered trans, at least by the old logic of "gender identity that isn't the same as birth sex." Even that (incredibly stupid) logic is being abandoned by people like Colin, because god forbid these people have any functional definitions of the words they use.
 
I don't think anyone should have a "human right" to go wherever they want without consent. Like I want to exploit your logic by using my human right to go in your bedroom just to upset you but I don't actually want to go in your bedroom because it probably is filthy.

Also, is a woman's vagina a "woman's private space"? Can trans women enter these without consent too? Wouldn't want to take away their human rights would we.
 
I wish that whenever he started shoving goalposts along and arguing about the intricacies of intersex conditions as if they were relevant, people would just post the double bra video as a gif in response. Idk if that’s too spicy for Twitter or rather colon would admit it was him to have it taken down but I think it’d be hilarious.

>These dumb twats call me he, psh!
>Dbl bra tit massage intensifies
 
View attachment 5843308
I ran across this grab on X. Holy shit, it almost lodged in my head like an embolism. It's the troon allegory of The Cave.
I am a biological woman because I'm am not a robot women
I suspect this is his attempt at a shitpost, but I've seen this among actual autists. They don't realize that if something's ambiguous, they ought to interpret it in the way that makes most sense. Unlike Monty, most of them learn this before they're in their thirties, though...
 
View attachment 5843308
I ran across this grab on X. Holy shit, it almost lodged in my head like an embolism. It's the troon allegory of The Cave.

He is a biological woman because "I'm am not" as he said.

Women aren't women at birth, but they are strangely, girls. Katy Motgomerie was not a girl at birth.

Melinda the woman who cut off her boyfriend's nuts is a normal woman because she likes pizza.

Katy Montgomerie is not a cis woman because he was born with a penis.

Word games!
 
Colin mocks a female anthropologist who was hounded out of her job for saying she could sex skeletons (who also got smacked with a racism charge from "mishandling" Native remains. Archive.
UwEuVOGFnM_x1.png

Nonsense!

OjDOQkWxi5_1.png
OdvZ4UNjYA_2.png
OARZz4cBHr_3.png
Komar, Debra A.; Buikstra, Jane E. [2008]: Forensic anthropology. Contemporary theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

GiRWrTkNA9_1.png

Byers, Steven N. (2002): Introduction to forensic anthropology. A textbook. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
 
He is a biological woman because "I'm am not" as he said.

Women aren't women at birth, but they are strangely, girls. Katy Motgomerie was not a girl at birth.
That's a really interesting quote to weaponize against the battier troon advocates. "all women were once girls"

Now obviously the troons will say they were girls when they were boys. But I don't think it's obvious how niche some tranny beliefs are. Sure the claim that they're truly real women is sadly somewhat mainstream, but normies don't believe that they endorse time traveling. Normies who do buy into the "transwomen are women" concept believe they became women, from men. Not that they were born girls in male bodies.
 
Last edited:
That's a really interesting quote to weaponize against the battier troon advocates. "all women were once girls"
This will also lead to "But I was a girl, I was never allowed to express it," and "But I am one now, this is my second puberty."

One is slightly more understandable, but expressing girlhood isn't something anyone does - that's silly. "But I wasn't allowed to BE myself, a girl," gets into what defines woman. Most normies even say "It is the XX or the reproduction system you were born with."

The second puberty thing is a smile and nod, then leave because you have a grown ass man pretending to be a young girl and not just crossdress.
 
I suspect this is his attempt at a shitpost, but I've seen this among actual autists. They don't realize that if something's ambiguous, they ought to interpret it in the way that makes most sense. Unlike Monty, most of them learn this before they're in their thirties, though...

Something very autistic about how he manages to be unbelievably pedantic but also incredibly vague in the language he uses. Without ever seeing any contradiction between these two things.
Troons make this very obvious as they all seem to suffer from it but there's a broader mentality wherein people seem to think that if something isn't perfect it fails. It may be better than all alternatives, it may be nearly perfect (like 99.8%) but any single failure, even if perfection was impossible, means it fails and should be scrapped for something better.

Then when you ask for the superior alternative you get "it's not my job to educate you." Or when you point out ways in which the proposed alternative is significantly worse you just get accused of acting in bad faith or not being for better things in general.

Troons are deliberately playing into this and trying to exploit it so failure to meet their desires to actually be the other sex* means the definition fails but I think many also legitimately think sex does not work because there are unnamed hypothetical third sexes that could be possible if you assume they exist. I don't think their confusion about intersex is just deliberate confusion-making, I think they may think they're legitimately third sexes and don't really care to learn why they're not. So sex must be vague, plus some person somewhere said there's maybe like six sexes and like nobody has disproven that so how do you know it's not possible? Why doesn't your ancient outdated sex definition account for any thing some person might say?

*something they admit is true when they demand puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, otherwise they could offer some kind of biological theory as to being the wrong sex rather than simply playing word games about robots and the meaning of biological, saying you're not a robot just proves that your biological sex is limited as robots wouldn't be bound by biology but humans are.
 
Back