Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.9%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.5%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 164 34.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 116 24.4%

  • Total voters
    476
why does he keep doing this?!?
1711483649197.png

nevermind. we know why.
 
And the absolute best for last, the case is effectively over already.
1711483956103.png
I got a bit worried for a moment, thinking this case will be coming to an abrupt end. I then took solace knowing Russel will still be filing court documents in Utah for the next two years, even if it is dismissed in the 11th Circuit.
 
This fucking neanderthal has done the incredible. He's made ralph with chatgpt look good.

He's fucking dumber than an AI. He could literally have called Hardin and received an answer for fucking free, and also complied with the court's order to communicate. HE COULD HAVE READ THIS THREAD.

Every time I think I've locked down FFWBT as the king of idiots, Russ comes up with something new. I'm still team fats all the way (Russ has now mentioned FFWBT but FFWBT has never mentioned Russ).
This thread is probably his very best source for information, explanations, and advice. If it want for us going into detail how he is an idiot every other post
 
i just noticed that in yesterdays cope memorandum, russ included this piece of 'evidence' lol
View attachment 5851452
no specific context, i just found it funny that fatrick was brought up in this seemingly at random
inb4 both issues align & clown world spins.
I will not be surprised if Patrick gets involved with the case.
if an "alleged" gayop fake comes to light due poking fate that toreswatts gone.
 
Last edited:
Does this kind of pleading ignorance actually work for pro se litigants, or is Russ as dumb as I think he is for whining to the court like this?
Maybe once or twice, if it's a simple procedural error that doesn't substantively harm the opposing party or alter the circumstances of the case, and if you're polite enough. Like, if you get the formatting wrong on a filing (6!) or screw up the caption or something, so long as it can be worked out unambiguously what you intended and it's not a pain in the ass to deal with, a patient court will overlook stuff like that or give a gentle "hey, fix this next time please" nudge.

But usually not for shit like missing deadlines or skipping conferences. That adversely affects the other party, who presumably is paying their attorney a handsome sum to do things correctly and is playing by the rules. "Pro se" doesn't mean "can run roughshod over the whole works."
 
With Greer's public filing that talks about the contents of his text with DJF could it be argued he waived any potential privilege he had in those communications? I doubt it would be helpful but it would be fun to see how much reeee'ing he does with them. It could even scare aware any future counsel or make them charge more if they knew what they were getting themselves involved with.
 
In his courtroom fantasy, his "family and friends" line up and provide dramatic testimony of his plights, and he's expecting the court to allow it. Unhinged.
I don't know what his family and friends are going to do for him as far as a copyright case is concerned. It's almost like he still thinks his harassment claims survived the appeal...

Also:
1711485673517.png
I would die laughing if the court says "Granted in part and denied in part. The 3-20-24 order is "Vacste" [vacated], the case will proceed in the District of Utah, however new deadlines will not be set and the court finds Plaintiff Greer has failed to litigate. Case dismissed."
 
He did it again:

View attachment 5851568


I enjoyed section 5(c):

View attachment 5851575

In his courtroom fantasy, his "family and friends" line up and provide dramatic testimony of his plights, and he's expecting the court to indulge it. Unhinged.



He's retarded.














6
I don't know what Alma matter is - is it some weird theoretical physics stuff?

He's also outright lying about why he moved. He moved because it was where the AGT tryouts were and to be closer to hookers.
 
:story: this wasn't some crazy legal argument Hardin made for moving venue. All you had to do is make a simple motion, but your laziness and ignoring the court handed him a massive W. Good luck on getting those copyright lawyers to pick up your case for free again on appeal.
Hardin better cite this motion if the question of the 10th ever appears. Russ concedes the 10th has no effect here, and that in itself is big for Null.
I love that, even granting him the idea that the threads are "stalking" in the first place
I love how that article doesn't even mention us or ONA forums
I'm desperate for Hardin or a judge to ask Russ what his or others claims of "harassment" has to do with a copyright lawsuit. All he talks about in all his filings is harassment and how he wants his thread removed.
Docket No. 65 had that question by Mr. Hardin

Anyway, W for Hardin:
Screenshot 2024-03-26 225203.png
(not sure why he outed himself as a Jew) that says jcw, my bad
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back