If they got in, they would commit crime, and blame it on whites. They'd work less, and blame their poverty on whites. They'd get passed over for jobs for being too stupid, and they'd call that racism.
What they absolutely would NOT do is bail, because they know exactly what the conditions outside that little sanctuary are like.
What I'm wondering is, who owns the land around Oreana? Are they boxed in such that they can never expand? I'm certain the government wont ever sell them any land. I suspect that they are ultimately doomed. Eventually, inevitably, ((((someone)))) is going to start sending truckloads of blacks to congregate outside their town, and the people of Oreana are going to have to fight back, and that will be the excuse to send in the military and destroy the town.
It's privately owned and run by essentially an HOA council. They have talked about hoping to expand and create other towns before, but the government has also talked about sending in the military and occupying or simply killing them before. The blacks there need no casus belli; they'd just do it in full knowledge they'd never be held accountable.
Anyway you slice this story it's pretty fucking awful. You either have a "good one" that wasn't very good or even good at his job. The other side of the coin is a female nog trying to pull the old "crabs in the pot" routine like Wanetta Gibson did. Then there's the peanut gallery saying "it don't matter if he done it he dindo nuffin, you uncle tom"!
In the years 2024 racism is powerful white people aren't even required to keep a nigga down. Seriously, fuck these people. If boats were never invented their entire culture would have peaked at the spear, the mud hut and finding things to do with animal feces.
Maybe it's foolish of me or weak I don't really know cause despite all the evidence put forth I can't really "hate" these people. Like I inherently want to believe that people aren't born bad and that a whole group of people aren't just a group you can write off. I can not trust black people and I can even know that I should always expect the worst when dealing with them, but I can't hate them.
Honestly I feel conflicted because I can't find an internal resolution to this.
Maybe it's foolish of me or weak I don't really know cause despite all the evidence put forth I can't really "hate" these people. Like I inherently want to believe that people aren't born bad and that a whole group of people aren't just a group you can write off. I can not trust black people and I can even know that I should always expect the worst when dealing with them, but I can't hate them.
Honestly I feel conflicted because I can't find an internal resolution to this.
'Anti-racist' indoctrination is a powerful drug when administered since childhood. The most powerful antidote is direct exposure to blacks themselves. Don't worry, you'll get there in the end.
You should never assume something about an individual, no matter what's true of the group.
You shouldn't automatically hate a person, even if they're from a group that's overwhelmingly bad. Also, you shouldn't automatically like a person, or trust a person, even if they're from a group that's overwhelmingly good.
This applies even to non-humans. Not every pitt bull is going to rip your throat out. Also, not every golden retriever is friendly.
You can't use statistics as an excuse to turn off your brain. You have to protect yourself at all times.
So what's the point of even knowing group differences?
The point is: group differences explain group outcomes. Pitt bulls are inherently more violent than golden retrievers. Therefore, if I show you a statistical difference in group outcomes (maybe more pit bulls are put down after biting someone), the appropriate response is to say, "yep, makes sense."
What would be really, really dumb to do, is to deny the possibility of group differences, and then respond to every statistical difference in outcomes by imagining it must be due to racism.
For example: "dog breeds are a social construct. There's no 'scientific legitimacy' to the concept of a 'breed' - scientists don't talk about 'breeds' - only species. There's more genetic difference within any given breed than between two breeds. Pit bull attacks are due to systemic mistreatment of pit bulls - it's really the golden retriever's fault" <---- that shit is fucking retarded - don't do that
But that is the mainstream (indeed, the only allowed) narrative about race. Don't believe me? Here's a slide from a conference for science teachers:
Don't jump to the conclusion that if you reject this "blank slate" bullshit, that you must necessarily hate black people. That's the logical fallacy called, "excluded middle." Instead, accept that there are real and meaningful group differences which lead to outcome differences ...but every individual still has a choice, still has value, and still deserves a chance.
There is a strategy I’ve only seen this group use, where you repeat the same stock phrases in short rotation at high volume and you just don’t let the other person get a word in even if the are actively seeking to solve your problem
This behavior triggers something atavistic in my brain. I absolutely hate it and how counterproductive it is. They want to dominate the other person, not actually solve the problem. Worse than dealing with a child.
Can someone explain the weave thing black women seem to have going on? Is literally every black woman wearing a wig? Why? Are they balding or want extravagant hairstyles and are just lazy?
I have spent more time than I want to admit figuring this out on YouTube.
Black hair comes in degrees of curliness, from loose curls to very tight coils. In black culture, this is the “good hair” to “bad hair” spectrum. (Straight=good, coily=bad.) The tighter the curl pattern, the harder it is to manage the hair without it breaking off or getting poofy, apparently. There are a couple of ways to deal with this, some people wear their hair very short, some have their hair “relaxed” (chemically straightened), some wear their own hair short or braided under a wig/weave, some have their own hair braided together with real or artificial hair, etc.
I get the impression that some of the elaborate black hair culture is about black hair being harder to manage, but TBH I also think people probably get culturally habituated to crazy hair and the ability to switch between extremely flamboyant hairstyles. Some black women do have a lot of hair loss and problems, I think from so much traction being on the hair in various styles.
There are multiple types of weaves. I stole the below from black women talking to each other about it on Reddit. But basically, a "quick weave" starts with a wig cap worn over your own braided hair, and then the weave hair is glued to that. A traditional sewn-in weave also starts with your own braided hair, but then the weave hair is literally sewn to that. People use "leave outs", which is a section of your own hair you leave out of the weave, to blend the weave hair together with your real hair.
Quick weave; hair gets washed conditioned and braided down depending on whether you get a closure quick weave or a leave out weave will determine the braid pattern, if you get leave out she will leave some of natural hair out to be pressed and blended with the extension hair. then a wig cap (or 2) is placed on top and the stylist should apply diamond protective bond. The bond and wig cap make it so that no glue at all gets on your natural hair and when you’re ready to remove it all you do is stand under hot water and it slides right off. Your extensions are cut and glued to the cap then the leave out / closure & baby hairs gets styled, if you asked for curls the curls would be done last and the stylist will probably spray your hair with some finishing products like spritz or sheen spray. Quick weave with leave out is 95% of the time the cheapest out of the three options you mentioned. You can opt for synthetic hair as well for it to be even cheaper, but synthetic is way harder to care for and may not last an entire month. I’d recommend getting pack hair or cheap bundles. Lasts about a month but will get itchy around the 3 week mark. Can’t scratch it, you have to pat.
Traditional sew in; hair gets washed conditioned and braided down, the stylist will leave the appropriate amount of hair out for your leave out (some of your natural hair to be pressed and blended with the extension hair) then the stylist will put a net over your braids and sew it down avoiding the leave out sections. Excess net cut off, the bundles start being sewn on to your braids & net. Cutting the bundles isn’t necessary therefore you can reuse them multiple times. The bundles will only have to be cut a tiny bit towards the top near your leave out. After all the hair is sewn in, your leave out gets blended baby hairs styled and your extensions will be styled per your request. I would NOT recommend sewing in synthetic hair, it may irritate your scalp. I’d suggest getting some nicer human hair bundles, or some nice pack hair. Traditional sew in is usually the second most expensive, it’s much more time consuming as well. Definitely will last a minute. 1-2 months if you want to stretch it that long and you got good bundles. You’ll have to touch up your leave out and style at home though. IMO best bang for your buck.
Closure sew in; same as traditional sew in but no leave out instead the stylist will glue a closure to your hairline. Most expensive out of your three options. Plus you’ll have to purchase a good closure along with the bundles. You’ll also have to know how to touch up your closure at home. Lasts about a month.
Summary; with a good stylist you won’t need any prep, come with your hair as is (as long as it isn’t badly matted) and they will wash and condition for you. You should probably consult with the stylist you choose on which hair to bring. If you choose a walk in salon the hair you should bring is dependent on your actual budget. Quick weave = hair glued onto protective cap and your leave out or closure will get styled $. Traditional sew in = hair sewn onto your braids and net and your leave out will be styled $$. Closure sew in = hair sewn onto your braids and net and closure will be applied to hairline and styled $$$.
There is other stuff I don't understand where people use specific terms to refer to the types of hair they buy. ("Yaki", "Remy", "Virgin"...) Hair comes in "bundles". Sometimes people buy real human hair (I think a lot of it comes from women in India) and sometimes it's synthetic. Black women spend unbelievable amounts of money on their hair. It seems to cost anywhere from 200+ bucks to have a quick weave thing "installed" and I don't think that includes the actual hair, which women seem to buy separately and bring to the salon?
It is unreal what people can do. If you browse black hair youtube you will see unbelievable stuff that will make you doubt the evidence of your eyes from here on.
Here is a woman installing a quick weave on herself. If I saw this woman in real life I would assume that this was her own, straightened hair. Most of it is (human, I guess?) hair glued to a cap glued to her head:
Here is a hairstylist installing (this is the word they all use) a traditional sew in weave. First she braids the client's real hair, then she sews on the weave hair stuff.
This woman is installing a wig I would have just believed is her real hair (it's poofy and kinky):
Here is a woman installing "crochet braids" (she crochets on fake hair to her own hair that is braided close to her scalp):
I think it's possible that MOST black women are doing something like this to their hair and most of the time when you see a black woman who has longer hair, there's something like the above going on, but maybe that's wrong. I'm not an expert, just an enthusiast.
Okay, so, we know that the standards for minority hires are lower than for white and asian people. I just have to wonder if that's the point. To make minorities look stupid and incompetent next to actual qualified people.
If you wanted to elevate black people, you would do the opposite. You would hire incompetent white people so the the qualified black guy would look good. It's just designed to make people racist by reinforcing the black=bad pattern. Shit's fucked.
I've actually met several black people who genuinely believed this, and honestly I agree with them. One of them was an artist who made really beautiful things, but she'd never gotten a "break" because whenever she showed up to a competition or whatever she lost to people whose work was more stereotypical and ugly. She realized somewhere along the line it was because that ugly shit was what people "expected" black art to look like, while she was just trying to make art.
Very similar to the 4chan post, actually:
but with shit like this instead of a guy sucking himself off:
Having watched that documentary "Empire of Dust" with that meme Chinese guy, and taking that in relation to my general experience and knowledge of sub Saharan Africans, I strongly believe now that those negroes were enslaved not out of malevolence but because that was the only way you could get them to do anything worthwhile.
I also saw someone describe that documentary as feeling like "running in a dream" lmao. Captures it perfectly.
I work with a black woman who is 25 with 5 children by 5 different fathers, ranging from 10 years old to an infant. It is so alien to me how she talks about them. She talks about her children the way I talk about the feral cats in the neighborhood. They are being kinda-sorta raised by her mother, as is tradition, and they all live together in a voucher townhouse i.e. don't pay rent. Grandma is on social security while she works part-time as the most unreliable and valueless server I've ever met, just wants to sit on her ass all day and immediately stops working if you aren't checking up on her every ten seconds. She gets some child support from the daddies that aren't in prison. It's really hard to believe this woman exists and I think a long conversation with her would make anyone start thinking racist thoughts.
I was talking with a black guy. He already has two kids before the age of 20. I told him it must be hard financially (as if he supports them in any way). He told me he wants to have 20 kids, because if even one of them makes it and gets rich, he will also be rich.
I told him, but if you have 20 kids, you won't be able to spend enough time with them, and they won't like you enough to give you money. He said no, he'll FORCE any of them that get money to give him money. He said if his kids become millionares, he should get a million dollars just because he's their dad.
I said, okay, maybe some of your kids get rich. But if YOU take their money, how are THEIR kids supposed to have money? Are you really going to rob your children and grandchildren blind?
He told me he never thought that far and made this "ooga booga you've delivered such a deep riddle" face that it really hurt me spiritually. "WOW CUZ! I gots to think.... I gots to think on dat wun!!! I nuhver think dar far bout dat bufurr... Huh...."
I legitimately think he's been impregnating women because he thinks it's a good financial plan because "at least some are bound to make it, and then I can mooch off them because I'm dad." Yet he has 0 plans to be Dad to them at all. He has no clue how: he didn't have a dad.
Something is deeply wrong with their culture. I became a little more racist today.
Anytime in the past I've thought, "I shouldn't think this way. Maybe it's because [thing] that those people are like this."
Then I interact with one of them that could be in any way described as a nigger and they immediately reinforce why stereotypes exist. And I guarantee you those people have similar feelings about you.
he'll FORCE any of them that get money to give him money. He said if his kids become millionares, he should get a million dollars just because he's their dad.
Reminds me of an interview with some black athlete, where he tells the story of signing his first big contract. He bought a nice car, then drove to his parents house, hoping they'd be proud of his success. His dad's first words were, "okay, where's mine?"
If I remember correctly, he kind of laughed when he told the story, but it seemed like it stung a little. He wanted his dad to be happy for him, but his dad only looked for his own payday.
The thing is, this isn't culture. I mean, it's not culture in the way that believers in the Blank Slate (tm) talk about culture. They imagine that if you raise a person in Japan, they'll act Japanese. If you raise them in Somalia, they'll become pirates.
Culture has some effect, but mostly culture is a reflection of the innate characteristics of the people in it. Blacks in America have been immersed for generations in a culture that is (or at least was) Protestant Christian ...but it has not rubbed off on them at all.
They mostly seem to have a sort of "cargo cult" relationship with Christianity.
