Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.7%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.4%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 165 34.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 119 24.8%

  • Total voters
    480
Status
Not open for further replies.
The description showing on CourtListener is just one word. I think the court staff have given up trying to describe this bullshit.

giveup.png


I would die laughing if the court says "Granted in part and denied in part. The 3-20-24 order is "Vacste" [vacated], the case will proceed in the District of Utah, however new deadlines will not be set and the court finds Plaintiff Greer has failed to litigate. Case dismissed."
Unless I misunderstand the rules, Utah can't do anything now, it's Florida's problem.

Russell might as well be screaming into an empty garbage can.
 
View attachment 5851471
As a non-lawyer. I'm pretty sure the court has free reign when one party doesn't respond within it's powers. If he would have written any argument about this motion, this would have been prevented.
View attachment 5851469
:story: this wasn't some crazy legal argument Hardin made for moving venue. All you had to do is make a simple motion, but your laziness and ignoring the court handed him a massive W. Good luck on getting those copyright lawyers to pick up your case for free again on appeal.
This mongoloid doesn't realize his 10th circuit "win" wasn't a win it was just a reopening.

He really is litigating "take down my thread" and he is so bad at it. He doesn't understand that originally he lost so hard the court didn't even consider his arguments, just that he's a fucking retard. The appeal court said "actually, he's really retarded, give him a break" and then he completely fucked it up and fumbled the ball.

Amusingly enough he makes Hardin's argument for him by arguing why the 11th should ignore the batshit insane 10th.
 
Ok, Civil Procedure is not really something I know anything about and I am sure there are others that are much more knowledgable about that but there is one thing that keeps bothering me about the latest Russ filings. He keeps going on about motions he can make to try and overturn a judgmennt, the moving of the procedure does not constitute a judgment as far as I understand, therefore none of the motions he is submitting amount to anything I would think. Is there any actual recourse he would have in this context? Also is there any possibility that the court would respond to his filings if only to say that he is wrong?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Napoleon III
The description showing on CourtListener is just one word. I think the court staff have given up trying to describe this bullshit.

View attachment 5851640



Unless I misunderstand the rules, Utah can't do anything now, it's Florida's problem.

Russell might as well be screaming into an empty garbage can.
CourtListener can't even spell Vacste right, what's wrong with them...

And yeah, I don't expect that anything will come from the Utah docket past the order to change venue, and I understand that he's technically shouting into the void right now... but this is a lolsuit. Sometimes in lolsuits the void shouts back.
 
Ok, Civil Procedure is not really something I know anything about and I am sure there are others that are much more knowledgable about that but there is one thing that keeps bothering me about the latest Russ filings. He keeps going on about motions he can make to try and overturn a judgmennt, the moving of the procedure does not constitute a judgment as far as I understand, therefore none of the motions he is submitting amount to anything I would think. Is there any actual recourse he would have in this context? Also is there any possibility that the court would respond to his filings if only to say that he is wrong?
I think he actually knows that, Russ is a bit smarter than he plays sometimes. I also think he knows he's fucked in florida and so he's hanging on to the tiniest bit of hope that lightning will strike twice (he really never should have been given that 10th circuit "win" as it has totally fucked his lolsuit skills).

A competent lawyer might be able to make an argument to bring the case back to Utah (or Nevada?) but it would be something like "this fucker just hired me, we all know this is bullshit, do me a solid" and Hardin might not even object too strenuously. But I suspect that is still highly unlikely just because courts don't like being fucked around with.
 
Just curious, but is there any chance that the Utah courts will get pissed off enough about Greer's continuing to waste their time with his screeching into the void that they'll do SOMETHING to bitch-slap that tard? I realize that I have a better chance winning the lottery 20 times in a row than for anything like that to occur, but...
 
Is there any actual recourse he would have in this context?
Appeal to the 10th. Literally the only thing he can do, and he would lose that.
Just curious, but is there any chance that the Utah courts will get pissed off enough about Greer's continuing to waste their time with his screeching into the void that they'll do SOMETHING to bitch-slap that tard?
I don't believe so
 
CourtListener can't even spell Vacste right, what's wrong with them...

And yeah, I don't expect that anything will come from the Utah docket past the order to change venue, and I understand that he's technically shouting into the void right now... but this is a lolsuit. Sometimes in lolsuits the void shouts back.
Could the Utah court send Greer a response saying that the move is done and cannot be changed so please stop sending motions to us it's getting annoying?
 
I asked Copilot
If a case has been transferred to a different court, it’s crucial to follow the correct legal procedures. Continuing to send motions to the old court after the case has been moved can lead to complications. Here are some potential outcomes:

Ineffective Motions:
The old court may consider your motions ineffective since they no longer have jurisdiction over the case.
Your motions might not be reviewed or acted upon, leading to delays or misunderstandings.
Dismissal or Sanctions:
If you persistently send motions to the old court despite the case being transferred, the court may dismiss your motions or impose sanctions.
Sanctions could include fines, penalties, or other consequences for violating court rules.
Lack of Progress:
Continuing to send motions to the old court can hinder the case’s progress.
The new court may not be aware of your motions, and important deadlines or hearings could be missed.
Communication with the New Court:
Notify the new court promptly about the case transfer.
File any necessary motions or pleadings with the new court, following their procedures.
Remember, legal matters are complex, and it’s essential to seek professional advice. Consult with an attorney or the court clerk to ensure you handle the case appropriately. 📜👩‍⚖️
 
Anyway, W for Hardin:
Screenshot 2024-03-26 225203.png

Even more proof that the venue change is unfair and prejudiced against pro se defendants. Getting that approved is supposed to be a hard process, and this is grounds for appeal!

1711487356408.png

I asked Copilot

Russ is going to lose this case because he's using the wrong AI. This isn't the cyberpunk future we were promised.
 
Even more proof that the venue change is unfair and prejudiced against pro se defendants. Getting that approved is supposed to be a hard process, and this is grounds for appeal!

View attachment 5851690
Hardin should mention that the reason that a venue change is "not an easy process" is that the court will accept basically any objection. If there's no objection then it's easy.
 
I've finished his motion to vacate, and it's really weird. All it is him repeating that Null waived his affirmative defense, just additionally citing to 28 U.S. Code § 1406 (which his own caselaw interprets the same way), but Null's affirmative defenses are not at issue. Null is not seeking dismissal by asserting an affirmative defense of an improper venue, he sought and received, a change of venue under the appropriate federal law. That is quite different, and something both the court and Mr. Hardin understood
 
Ralph has hated Null before. Eventually he'll kill the braincells that remember why with booze.
There's only one cow with the right mindset, rage, physical prowess and debilitating need for cash to run collections for Null, and that's one Bossman Jack.

I do, however, concede that the collections making it from the collectee to Null might be problematic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back