I have soaked up the multimedia offerings of many of the e-Christians. Nothing could have been more destructive to my faith than consuming the work of e-Christians. Even the theological "greats" can't agree on anything. John MacArthur stated during one of his Q&A sessions that the sin for which a person was ultimately damned was the rejection of Christ. The late RC Sproul stated the exact opposite: fundamentally, we're damned because of the full multitude of sins we commit; lack of faith in Christ ensures that those sins won't be pardoned, but ultimately it's the sins themselves for which punishment is meted out. Or, here's another example: MacArthur has waxed poetic during several of his sermons about how Christ cried out, "Why have you forsaken me?" because the full wrath of God was being poured out upon him in that moment. Yet James White has convincingly argued that Christ's purpose in uttering those words was to quote from Psalm 22 and direct attention to the prophetic fulfillment of the subsequent verses in Psalm 22.
Where this all falls apart is with the following claim: "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear,
that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come." (John 16:13).
If the Holy Spirit actually
dwells within human beings and, in so doing, guides human beings
into all truth ... then why is there an utter lack of Christian concord on
any substantive doctrinal or dogmatic formulation? If the Spirit is leading people into "all truth," why does each individual Christian end up with quirks and idiosyncrasies that often cause two self-identified Christians to have entirely different and incompatible worldviews? Additionally, why are so many millions of self-identified Christians so stupid and greedy as to give money to televangelists and other grifters? Of course, the heart of my complaint is not that the Holy Spirit allows people to throw away their material resources. No, the problem is much deeper: The Holy Spirit didn't stop John Calvin from conspiring in the juridical murder of Servetus. You can't find one strain of Christian thought that hasn't used force and violence to impose itself. The overall effect is to make Christianity appear to be yet another man-made ideology contending for supremacy.
In the few cases in which "the body of Christ" does seem to cluster around a shared interpretation, such as the Trinity, it inevitably ends in burnings, hangings, and other violence.
Put another way, when members of one group of Christians burnt alive members of another group of Christians, was the Holy Spirit glorified? Specifically, what about situations in which the doctrinally "correct" Christians did their best to exterminate the heretics? Is the Holy Spirit glorified by executions of heretics? If you answer "Yes" then, for the sake of logical consistency, you must support the execution of Mormons and JWs—who are not merely heretical but also actively promote their heresies. Whatever criteria you might imagine justify the execution of heretics throughout history, the same criteria apply today to Mormons and JWs. Since you know in your conscience that it would be wrong to murder those annoying people who show up on your door, you should also be convicted that the murder of heretics by church authorities throughout history has been a Satanic counterfeit of justice.
I have heard the facile and idiotic arguments from mendacious Christians who have a vested interest in defending Calvin or whatever other pet murderer they wish to defend. They'll say, "Executions for blasphemy are justified under a theocratic government that enforces the will of God but are no longer justified in today's secular government." What a load of horseshit that only the most evil and simple-minded fools could even pretend to believe! Such murderous cretins allege that the blood of heretics was pleasing to God in one age but not pleasing to God any longer. They have not read or understood: “The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever” (Isaiah 40:

, not to mention “I the Lord do not change” (Malachi 3:6). The more pigheaded among them will insist that God is glorified by the shedding of heretics' blood, ignoring the reality that "the Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance."
Anyway, the conclusion I've reached is that most Christians simply use their "faith" as a psychological defense dome. What angers a Christian more than anything else are
uncomfortable thoughts. Having your political rival murdered on phony blasphemy charges is fine: that's something you can be redeemed from, and you don't even need to repent consciously! But questioning your own salvation, or the salvation of those around you?
That's the work of the devil! Ha!!