Android Raptor wants you to know how much she hates conservative Christians for the billionth time

I know you hate my religion
Does she though? Seems like she hates a strawman. Christianity is like autism. It exists on a spectrum right now. There's constant hilarity in people pointing to "Christians" and they don't have any clue about anything involving sects, denominations, or whether that "Christian" is just some bimbo wearing a cross around their neck.

Point being, hatred of a "religion" isn't worth much if one doesn't really know anything about it. Which AR clearly doesn't.
 
Does she though? Seems like she hates a strawman. Christianity is like autism. It exists on a spectrum right now. There's constant hilarity in people pointing to "Christians" and they don't have any clue about anything involving sects, denominations, or whether that "Christian" is just some bimbo wearing a cross around their neck.

Point being, hatred of a "religion" isn't worth much if one doesn't really know anything about it. Which AR clearly doesn't.
The problem is she thinks the strawman represents the entire religion, regardless of sect or denomination.
 
The problem is she thinks the strawman represents the entire religion
No, this is what frustrates everyone who argues with her. She is clearly smart enough to understand there are nuances yet only applies said nuances arbitrarily.
It is is "for me but not for thee" every single time. You can't win an argument against that because it is already fundamentally an anti-intellectual platform.

To be clear: AR chooses to be ignorant. And she lives in a world where there are no immediate consequences for that.
Now, it's one thing to choose to be ignorant, but AR says the quiet part aloud and basically tells you she has chosen to be ignorant.
Again, people don't seem to understand you cannot win an argument against someone who not only chooses ignorance, but openly acknowledges it.

I kind of hate how Jordan Peterson has fucked this all up by saying Lefties are low IQ individuals who only see the world under an oppressed/oppressor veneer.
No, there are plenty of high IQ lefties who choose to see the world under a particular veneer because it enables them to be politically correct authoritarians. And, sometimes, that authoritarianism has arisen because some abuse they experienced left them feeling powerless.

The only standpoint by which any of this makes sense is if the alleged abuse she has experienced is real. Because, it if is, then why would anyone want to apply nuance to their abuser, right? No, it is far better and far easier to establish that abuse is clear-cut wrong and leave it at that. Same with everyone else one picks and chooses.

The real problem isn't AR's right-wing strawman. It's the dude who decides to sex change himself into a chick and then claim he was eye-raped on the subway. Now he can be a victim too! It's as easy as 1, 2, 3. AR has inevitably lumped herself in with the kinds of people who can just arbitrarily assign "abuse" to themselves like it's changing their clothes. In which case, if her alleged abuse is real, it will be taken just as seriously.
 
Last edited:
Insane fundies are more common than insane troons that scream about men eye raping them
Fundies get more ass blasted than SJWs, their riotous indignation deluded them into believing they're better than the average blue-haired screamer. Christians beleive in far more fairytale bullshit than SJWs, even with their headmates and otherkin gender identities.
 
Just call her a spedo that doesn't know how numbers work.
Numbers can be used by oppressors towards the oppressed. Therefore, math must also be suspect.
Remember, no nuance is allowed or else even the concept of abuse even is or what it looks like can be questioned.

Like I said, AR's greatest problem in this affair is she has hitched her wagon to people who make up or adopt their own victim narratives and abuse stories like they're candy. It's been a long-bred phenomenon and it comes at the price of actually devaluing one's own story amidst a sea or stories that may or may not be true but must always be taken seriously else two things will happen:
1) Communities whose members built their social status on victimhood will crumble to pieces.
2) Those atop the progressive stack will lose their politically-correct authority over other members of society.
 
Last edited:
Fundies get more ass blasted than SJWs, their riotous indignation deluded them into believing they're better than the average blue-haired screamer. Christians beleive in far more fairytale bullshit than SJWs, even with their headmates and otherkin gender identities.
They also have way more power and influence in red states than SJWs.

Pretty sure it's not SJWs that banned girls in Florida from being taught about their own bodies before 6th grade.
 
Glad you're into kindergarten drag queen sex ed.
Even kindergartners need sex ed in the form of being taught proper names for body parts, what is and isn't an OK way for people to touch them, and how to get help if they're being abused. Kids need to be taught that shit as soon as they become capable of retaining the info and it's sus AF when people think kids shouldn't be taught abuse prevention shit like that at schools.
 
I don't know what's more retarded; the buck broken spedo or the failtroll trying to suck said spedo's dick to troll.
Talking about me? The reason I said anything is because I don't believe in threatening abuse victims with hell.

Let me clarify on my first post: there might be a hell but not for flesh-and-blood human beings who simply make mistakes. Psychopaths and the sort would go to hell since they're not really human to begin with. Human beings don't do what they do. You can see it in their eyes that there is no human consciousness in there.

To those who know anything about pedophiles, you know that they're not "attracted to children", they are trying to cause pain and distress and they go to inordinate lengths to do this. They are not human beings suffering from a personality disorder, they are the enemy and need to be shot in the back of the head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB18plt2i6U
 
Talking about me? The reason I said anything is because I don't believe in threatening abuse victims with hell.

Let me clarify on my first post: there might be a hell but not for flesh-and-blood human beings who simply make mistakes. Psychopaths and the sort would go to hell since they're not really human to begin with. Human beings don't do what they do. You can see it in their eyes that there is no human consciousness in there.

To those who know anything about pedophiles, you know that they're not "attracted to children", they are trying to cause pain and distress and they go to inordinate lengths to do this. They are not human beings suffering from a personality disorder, they are the enemy and need to be shot in the back of the head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB18plt2i6U
I was meaning the autist with the sonic avatar, but if you wish to take it that way...
 
Even kindergartners need sex ed in the form of being taught proper names for body parts, what is and isn't an OK way for people to touch them, and how to get help if they're being abused. Kids need to be taught that shit as soon as they become capable of retaining the info and it's sus AF when people think kids shouldn't be taught abuse prevention shit like that at schools.
Sex ed is not stranger danger. A kindergartner doesn't need to know what anal is.

When I was a child, I learned that someone fondling me was not okay. However, I was not taught how to give a blowjob.

Understanding what is/is not okay does not require comprehensive understanding of the subject until an acceptable age is reached. If you introduce it too early, you normalize experimentation and sodomy.
 
Back