- Joined
- Apr 6, 2019
He doesn't. His only vices are orange cheddar cheese and murdering intellectually disabled French Canadian women.Does anyone know if JF smokes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He doesn't. His only vices are orange cheddar cheese and murdering intellectually disabled French Canadian women.Does anyone know if JF smokes?
"Family projects" is the preferred nomenclature.He is staying put, well within their sights, and they (have?) had frequent contact with him. If they go to trial with neither her body nor copious evidence of her death at his hands, jeopardy will attach. He could also be found not guilty, or the charges dismissed for lack of evidence.
There is no good reason for them to make a move.
Personally, I’m squigged out that two young, impressionable, likely traumatized children are left in the care of an - at best - unbalanced man, but that’s not LE’s concern, nor should it be.
I hope that his Mom or someone is there to help him, because a toddler and a baby can be taxing, and if he’s alone the kids will suffer his narc rages.
Well, he inseminates them first.He doesn't. His only vices are orange cheddar cheese and murdering intellectually disabled French Canadian women.
I'm guessing that he did not, as I think he killed her after an unplanned argument that set him off.this'll sound fucked, but do we think he is the type to have filmed the murder?
I disagree. Based upon....I'm guessing that he did not, as I think he killed her after an unplanned argument that set him off.
My opinion is he just freaked out like a retard with pathetic levels of executive functioning and beat her to death with a blunt object, splattering blood everywhere, which is why he had to rip apart his house and replace everything, including the load-bearing drywall, after he dragged her corpse into the wilderness to hide it.....my theory is that he planned this out in exquisite detail for months or even years.
I thought the only person Mama JF accused of trying to kill her was No White Guilt?I disagree. Based upon....
>Mama JF's various clips where she's accused JF of trying to kill her
I don’t think poutine lasts that long when refrigeratedI guarantee you he's got some trophy of her on the shelf or in the fridge.
I thought the only person Mama JF accused of trying to kill her was No White Guilt?
Was it worth it? JFG’s big idea is that sometimes replicators make a new type of replicator that takes over, and this might occur in the near future again to our detriment. In biology, we think that DNA evolved from RNA. These days almost everything is made of DNA, not RNA...
JFG calls this a revolutionary phenotype. In fact, the book is full of new terms he made up. Here’s a list, I probably missed some:
This tendency is typical of philosophy, especially the work of Dan Dennett, whose work JFG builds on. In fact, if you have already read Richard Dawkins, Dan Dennett, and Susan Blackmore’s biology and memetics books, you won’t learn too much from this book. On the other hand, this book is shorter than reading their work.
- native replicator
- embedded life forms
- “to n d”
- quene
- qream, qreamplex
- replicator tango
- The Naked Warrior
- Trickster Printers
- fool replicator
Aside from the annoying neologisms, the book is extremely pompous.
JFG clearly has high opinions of his ideas. So I was curious. What work has JFG done to justify such a stance? He does have a ResearchGate profile, so we can easily check. From my count:
Of course, it should be said that, in principle, great scientific advancements can come from scientific nobodies — it just isn’t very likely. If JFG had published some other impressive work previously, it would help people take his book seriously.
- He has published 21 papers. Of these, 5 are first authors (usually meaning he did most of the work), and 1 is last author (usually meaning he had some substantial role). The remaining papers he is a middle author, usually meaning that he did some lab work, or was someone’s student at the time. Most of his papers are trivial neuroscience stuff (e.g. “Neuronal reference frames for social decisions in primate frontal cortex”, “The interactions between locomotion and respiration”)). Nothing to write home about.
- He has written one short book published in 2018. As of writing, though JFG clearly thinks it has extreme importance, it has been cited a total of 1 time, and that’s in some Russian language document. Clearly, not much has come out of this work. No one pays any attention to it outside of his fan circle.
Here we get to his doomsday scenario. While AI doomsday scenarios are dime a dozen these days, this one doesn’t have much plausibility. Why would AI bother editing human genetics to make us dumb labor? AI doesn’t need human dumb labor. In fact, humans today in advanced countries barely need dumb labor. Future AI overlords will have machines to do this work much more efficiently. It doesn’t make any sense. It sounds like the story of The Matrix where humans are used as a power source. That doesn’t make any sense either. Humans don’t generate power robots can use. Humans are net negative energy machines, they consume rather than generate energy. It’s something you take for granted as part of suspension of disbelief to get on with the story.
Look, I know Mama JF was terminally retarded before she was killed, but I don't believe she was stupid enough to think that the psycopathic pillow salesman and enthusiast of neurolinguistic programming (grooming) would save her.There was the infamous clip where JF cut her off and, in that video, my interpretation was that she was telling NWG that JF was trying to kill her and she was seriously pleading for help. But I recall seeing several other clips (although my memory could be off) where Mama JF was saying the same thing. I will dig through the old pages here later on and try to link to the clips.