Inactive Andrew Dobson / Tom Preston / CattyN - STOP DOING SEXIST CRAP

SteelPlatedHeart said:
View attachment 144208

I see no such tweet, fyi.
Click to expand...
It's true though, from what I can make out the wage gap is mostly to do with women often being responsible for child rearing so mothers take part time work (Which pays less) or move into careers that allow for flexible work schedules but Dobby is probally just seeing "Women are paid less than men" and not looking into it any further and if that was the case everyone should just hire women because they work for less.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Judex Meus, IAmNotDavid, Urban Superstition and 3 others
IMG_4337.jpg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotDavid
DracoRincewind said:
Oh god please tell me that's not Lum in the the top right!
Click to expand...

He recently retweeted some pictures of Lum, so yes. Unfortunately, Lum is being subjected to being Dobson'd.

That thumbnail of Rodger Rabbit though.

Dobson, I know you're old as dirt now, but stop putting god damn old man wrinkles under everyone's eyes!
 
  • Feels
Reactions: IAmNotDavid
Pickle Inspector said:
It's true though, from what I can make out the wage gap is mostly to do with women often being responsible for child rearing so mothers take part time work (Which pays less) or move into careers that allow for flexible work schedules but Dobby is probally just seeing "Women are paid less than men" and not looking into it any further and if that was the case everyone should just hire women because they work for less.
Click to expand...

It's because on average men work 7.6 more hours weekly than women.

Source The Bureau of Labor Statistics American time use survey 2012.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotDavid, Urban Superstition, *Asterisk* and 8 others
Well we've already seen Ruby (the weird fishy-faced Sapphire romance novel cover) and the Dobbear (the recent SYAC comic)

Rodger and Lum are new.
 
SteelPlatedHeart said:
Oh, this is rich...

View attachment 144191 View attachment 144192 View attachment 144193 View attachment 144194 View attachment 144195 View attachment 144196

And to clarify...

View attachment 144197
Click to expand...

Dobson, like every childish feminazi, is a cunt who cares little about actual oppression of women because, deep down inside, they are insecure cowards who play it safe by picking on harmless nerds on the internet.

Also, real classy, Dobson. You hear of 'rape' and 'murder', and your response is 'And?' Just do everyone a favor. Volunteer your body to science and let the people behind "Will It Blend?" have at you, you fucking asshole.
 
  • Agree
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: IAmNotDavid, Urban Superstition, ZehnBoat and 5 others
Wow. Pleb was right. It really is ridiculously easy to fix his art.
If I was an artist, (which I'm not. I just play one on the internet) I would be fucking embarrassed.

Some moving and resizing later...
IMG_4318 kopiera 2.jpg

(The cat thing was beyond saving so it had to go)
Trigger, trigger. I'm a bear.
People hate me everywhere.

I make art that no one likes.
(Only when the feeling strikes.)

I take money from my fans.
But never spare them slightest glance.

When online I always groan.
I yell and bitch and cry and moan.

My own thoughts and views are strong.
All you JERKS are just plain wrong!

Can't you tell my mind is locked?
Try to argue when you're blocked!

Trigger, trigger. "Woe is me!"
I'm the victim can't you see!?

- "Ode to Dobson" Adolf_Ash, 2016
 
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, IAmNotDavid, dookerbewitt and 14 others
El Rodrigo said:
Also, for the love of God stop drawing those creepy Miraculous Ladybug characters, they make you look like a pedophile, damn
Click to expand...

Reaching a bit far there: If drawing an underage character at all makes you a paedophile, then basically everyone who has ever created a child character is a paedophile. It's if he does his creepy lesbians/bike pumps thing with them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cappaint
RealDecepticonLeader said:
Reaching a bit far there: If drawing an underage character at all makes you a paedophile, then basically everyone who has ever created a child character is a paedophile. It's if he does his creepy lesbians/bike pumps thing with them.
Click to expand...

It is less the fact he draws them that makes him look like a pedophile, it is the fact that it is Dobson who draws them.
Look, I doubt Dobson is a kiddy fiddler or has the tendencies.
But there is no denial that he is way to obsessed about the portrayal of lesbians in fiction and watching animated, diabetes inducingly cute and partly infantile stuff primarily targeted at kids.

you like watching that Ladybug show? Fine. But don't act like it is the greatest thing ever if you are a 35 year old man. At that age you should at least be rational enough about shit like that to understand that a) it is not very original b) that as an adult you sperging like crazy about it sounds all kinds of creppy, especially if there are more adult things to focus on in life and c) you don't have to justify like crazy that you watch it, cause it makes you look even crazier.

And that does not take into account that he is so obsessed about wanting to see girls "cuddle" and do cute things together, he ignores any obvious unfortunate implications that would have (especially for a bald creep like him) and instead tries to justify it under the banner of "supporting" the gay movement. And sorry, but when people hear that, they also think of gay sex/sex in general and start to create a chain of association that results in thinking "wait. Does dobson want to see underaged girls have sex, because it is "cute"?

In short: Dobson ends up looking like a pedophile, because he does not act like an adult around childish subjects or when "analyzing" a story.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GrayWater, IAmNotDavid, Vasilisa and 12 others
Jews actually do shit to earn money, finance ain't easy.

SteelPlatedHeart said:
Oh, this is rich...

View attachment 144191 View attachment 144192 View attachment 144193 View attachment 144194 View attachment 144195 View attachment 144196

And to clarify...

View attachment 144197
Click to expand...

Videos are "anecdotal evidence". Which proves that Dobson is both dumber than previously thought (a feat he keeps managing to pull off despite digging a hole and setting the bar at the bottom of it), because he clearly doesn't know what that word means... he just knows it's something feminists say when they don't want to acknowledge something, call it "anecdotal" and it obviously doesn't matter.

"Do you want me to speak in subjects I'm haphazardly fluent in?"

THAT IS ABSOLUTELY THE ONLY THING YOU DO WITH YOUR LIFE YOU LITTLE SHIT.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotDavid, Urban Superstition, MeefaZeTroll and 4 others
UglyOldJafar said:
It is less the fact he draws them that makes him look like a pedophile, it is the fact that it is Dobson who draws them.
Look, I doubt Dobson is a kiddy fiddler or has the tendencies.
But there is no denial that he is way to obsessed about the portrayal of lesbians in fiction and watching animated, diabetes inducingly cute and partly infantile stuff primarily targeted at kids.

you like watching that Ladybug show? Fine. But don't act like it is the greatest thing ever if you are a 35 year old man. At that age you should at least be rational enough about shit like that to understand that a) it is not very original b) that as an adult you sperging like crazy about it sounds all kinds of creppy, especially if there are more adult things to focus on in life and c) you don't have to justify like crazy that you watch it, cause it makes you look even crazier.

And that does not take into account that he is so obsessed about wanting to see girls "cuddle" and do cute things together, he ignores any obvious unfortunate implications that would have (especially for a bald creep like him) and instead tries to justify it under the banner of "supporting" the gay movement. And sorry, but when people hear that, they also think of gay sex/sex in general and start to create a chain of association that results in thinking "wait. Does dobson want to see underaged girls have sex, because it is "cute"?

In short: Dobson ends up looking like a pedophile, because he does not act like an adult around childish subjects or when "analyzing" a story.
Click to expand...
Also this:
azumanga_daioh_by_cattynreturns-d4ayxbm.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: IAmNotDavid, Male Idiot, MeefaZeTroll and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back