- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
^ That one.Surtur said:I like the ME3 ending.
Well, I need to specify. I didn't like the original, I liked the remade ending(s).
Hell, I don't see why Mass Effect 3 gets so much hate in general. Oh wait, yes I do. It's published by EA and people have a compulsive need to hate everything EA does, even if some games they've published are good. I thought Mass Effect 3 was a really solid game. They found the perfect sweet spot between RPG and 3rd person shooter for the series (Mass Effect 1 kinda missed the mark on a few notes, Mass Effect 2 got it almost dead-on, and ME3 refined what ME2 did) and the multiplayer can be surprisingly fun if you play it with the right people. (playing with strangers can be annoying, but such is the case for many games.) Sure, the micro-transactions in the multiplayer are a stupid idea, but only the greediest of the greediest would actually feel the need to use them. Getting points goes really quickly.
Also, I didn't hate F.3.A.R. but don't get me wrong, I understand why people do hate it. It's a pretty shitty singleplayer game. Not memorable at all the way the first and to lesser extend the second were... As for the horror argument: this one confuses me. Throughout the reception of FEAR 1 and 2, everyone complained about the horror not being good and it being unnecessary, while praising the action... The third one focuses on the action, but everyone hates that it stopped having as much horror suddenly? Seems a little bit silly to me.
Then there's what really justified the (admittedly ~5 dollar) purchase for me: the co-op. F.3.A.R. has some genuinely interesting ideas about Co-op that very few games manage, mainly in that playing as one character is a different experience from the other. To me, it makes the co-op dynamic pretty interesting. More interesting than where the second player is just a carbon copy of the first.
But yeah, TL;DR, didn't hate ME3 and FEAR3