Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

pooners-behemoth.png
I just noticed the 4'5 pooner on the left is wearing a shirt that says 'trans kids deserve to grow up'.

Irony on a cosmic scale.
 
I just noticed the 4'5 pooner on the left is wearing a shirt that says 'trans kids deserve to grow up'.

Irony on a cosmic scale.

It makes more sense when you remember they view healthy, unmangled, but gender nonconforming kids as walking dead, suitable only as the raw materials for the trans child within.
 
I can't wait to hear from an expert like Professor-Doctor Reed about how the Cass review is all wrong and all the dumb medical professionals involved in it are big dumb poopy heads
Same, whenever any of these big medical reviews come out the first thing I think of is "I wonder how long it takes Big Tone to deboonk this".
Subscribe to support his work.
 
Same, whenever any of these big medical reviews come out the first thing I think of is "I wonder how long it takes Big Tone to deboonk this".
Subscribe to support his work.
It took a large team of medical experts around 4 years to undertake the review and finalise the report, so I wouldn't expect the deboonking to require more than a couple of days.
 
I can't wait to hear from an expert like Professor-Doctor Reed about how the Cass review is all wrong and all the dumb medical professionals involved in it are big dumb poopy heads

It is because all the contributors are anti-trans (and he'll dig up some single tweet from 15 years ago to prove this), there should only be troons involved and it departs from something like the "universal agreed upon medical standard of care" which was all dictated by troons and troon apologists.
 
He's started seething about the Cass review, and also community notes. Couldn't find the note in question, but love how pissed he is that he can't control them.

Screenshot 2024-04-10 6.22.55 PM.png

Montgomery's take is so bad I don't know where to start:
Screenshot 2024-04-10 6.25.32 PM.png


I can't figure out what they are trying to say. Is it bad for their cause that behaviour has a biological basis as well as a social one, cos how you behave is what you are biologically, so no need to transition? Or is it good cos then Tony wearing a dress really proves that he's a woman.

So far not seen him say an original Tony take, just retweeting others responses.

ETA, again not sure what he thinks this proves:

Screenshot 2024-04-10 6.32.58 PM.png


Oh no! Feminists have really shot themselves in the foot. Is the Cass review written by feminists, or 'feminists'? In fact do we know anything about the authors ideological purity and therefore whether we should believe their results? Who allowed them to write that two things can contribute to another in a complex dynamical system?
 
He's started seething about the Cass review, and also community notes. Couldn't find the note in question, but love how pissed he is that he can't control them.

View attachment 5894507

Montgomery's take is so bad I don't know where to start:
View attachment 5894508


I can't figure out what they are trying to say. Is it bad for their cause that behaviour has a biological basis as well as a social one, cos how you behave is what you are biologically, so no need to transition? Or is it good cos then Tony wearing a dress really proves that he's a woman.

So far not seen him say an original Tony take, just retweeting others responses.
May I remind big Colin that Mermaids used to say this shit before they were exposed. These notions have come from the trans activism side. (So that’s probably what the Cass review is attempting to respond to.

Before:
IMG_1803.jpeg
IMG_1802.jpegAnd after:
IMG_1804.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I love that what makes Tony seethe the most is he failed out of becoming a doctor (so he could brag about how smart he is) and now all these actual doctors are invading his new identity that he took on to atleast win at something and are disagreeing with him. And people are actually listening to them instead of smartest gal in the universe Erin Reed. I bet the fact that the review is being read by a real female real doctor with real qualifications is like having sand in his mangled urethra
 
Flushed red skin is associated with anabolic steroid use as well, so I think it's also caused by the testosterone itself. AFAIK there isn't a lot of actual published science on why it happens, but there are many years of posts on bodybuilding forums saying "hey bros why am I flushed so red?"

View attachment 5891055

View attachment 5891054


Probably has something to do with the same high RBC count that gives so many pooners blood clots.

Apart from all that, I can't get over how unhealthy these people all look. I mean beyond the obvious things, like so many of them being overweight and unwashed. Something in my lizard brain sees everyone in that picture, and thinks "this person will not survive the winter."
The condition that causes them to flush is formally called Steroid Rosacea and is caused by either too much or incorrect steroid usage (be it topical or intravenous),it's basic causation mechanism is the same as for steroid induced acne.

"Steroid-induced rosacea is an iatrogenic condition (induced by the physician or patient) from the use of either systemic steroid or topical steroids. It is nearly identical to steroid induced acne from the standpoint of etiology."

 
Last edited:
Montgomery's take is so bad I don't know where to start:
View attachment 5894508


I can't figure out what they are trying to say. Is it bad for their cause that behaviour has a biological basis as well as a social one, cos how you behave is what you are biologically, so no need to transition? Or is it good cos then Tony wearing a dress really proves that he's a woman.

So far not seen him say an original Tony take, just retweeting others responses.

ETA, again not sure what he thinks this proves:

View attachment 5894536

Oh no! Feminists have really shot themselves in the foot. Is the Cass review written by feminists, or 'feminists'? In fact do we know anything about the authors ideological purity and therefore whether we should believe their results? Who allowed them to write that two things can contribute to another in a complex dynamical system?
I've seen tweets from mothers crying that despite their attempts to raise a child not steeped in stereotypical gender norms their young (4-6 year old) daughter has suddenly decided to play with dolls, loves Disney princesses, and the color pink. I never see boy moms saying this, but a lot of boy moms are crazy.

Anecdotally, my brother and I are very close in age. Mom made us share our toys, but while there was some crossover, generally I liked Barbies and he liked cars. We both liked Legos, though he liked them more. I built houses, he built other stuff.

Our friends fell in the same categories as our sexes typically, games with mixed sexes involved force fields and king of the mountain or red rover - physically active games with a strong fantasy element, games with girls only tended toward house or school teacher or jump rope - less physically active games more rooted in reality.

The gay kid on our street played hide and seek with the boys and Barbies and jump rope with the girls. None of us were forced into one type of toy or one type of game. We just kind naturally gravitated towards different things.

I suspect there is a somewhat biological predisposition to certain games or toys, which becomes certain hobbies and careers when older. Given my N=1 experience with the gay kid on our street, I suspect that biological predisposition is wired differently than in straight kids. Girls who are tomboys don't tend to grow up to be lesbian, but I bet a lot of/most boys who play with dolls grow up to be gay.

Wait, what happened to @Geranium?
 
Screenshot 2024-04-10 6.25.32 PM.png


I can't figure out what they are trying to say. Is it bad for their cause that behaviour has a biological basis as well as a social one, cos how you behave is what you are biologically, so no need to transition? Or is it good cos then Tony wearing a dress really proves that he's a woman.
This is a weird take from Colin.Wouldn't they be using this as proof that they're really girls?Yet Colin is laughing about the ridiculousness of the toys kids play with proves gender is real?Were really back to "toys and dresses dont prove transgenderism?Good grief can these people make up their minds already?
 
Last edited:
I can't wait to hear from an expert like Professor-Doctor Reed about how the Cass review is all wrong and all the dumb medical professionals involved in it are big dumb poopy heads

Man with no discenrable qualifications to even comment hopes to deboonk years long study with corresponding 400 page findings in 48 hours.

Side spreg: This will be exactly like the WPATH files debook that asserted "over 200 errors" but Tony only pointed to something like 10 items.
 
Back