US 10 years after armed standoff with federal agents, Bundy cattle are still grazing disputed rangeland - Some heard echoes of Bunkerville and Malheur when rioters clashed with police on Jan. 6, 2021, outside and inside the halls of Congress and temporarily blocked certification of the 2020 presidential election.

BUNKERVILLE, Nev. (AP) — The words “Revolution is Tradition” stenciled in fresh blue and red paint mark a cement wall in a dry river wash beneath a remote southern Nevada freeway overpass, where armed protesters and federal agents stared each other down through rifle sights 10 years ago.

It was just before noon on a hot and sunny Saturday when backers of cattle rancher Cliven Bundy, including hundreds of men, women and children, made the U.S. Bureau of Land Management quit enforcing court orders to remove Bundy cattle from vast arid rangeland surrounding his modest family ranch and melon farm.

Witnesses later said they feared the sound of a car backfiring would have unleashed a bloodbath. But no shots were fired, the government backed down and some 380 Bundy cattle that had been impounded were set free.

“Since then, we’ve relatively lived in peace,” Ryan Bundy, eldest among 14 Bundy siblings, said in a telephone interview. “The BLM doesn’t contact us, talk to us or bother us.”

“The BLM does not have any comment on this subject,” agency spokesman John Asselin said in response to email inquiries about the standoff, Bundy cattle grazing today in Gold Butte National Monument and the more than $1 million in unpaid grazing fees and penalties the BLM said Bundy owed in 2014.

At the ranch, Cliven Bundy greeted guests this week while cradling one of 74 grandchildren and 21 great-grandchildren that he has with his wife, Carol Bundy.

“We’re all a little bit older,” he said, “but we’re still doing the same thing: ranching.”

Later, watching two of his sons and a friend rope yearling bulls in a pen, the plainspoken and photogenic rancher — who rallied followers through a bullhorn that day saying, “Let’s go get those cattle” — recalled being arrested, jailed for nearly two years and brought to a trial that was dismissed due to prosecutorial misconduct.

bundy 1.png
Ranch hands rope a bull on the Bundy ranch, Tuesday, April 9, 2024, in Bunkerville, NV. (AP Photo/Ty ONeil)

“I’ve had that dot on my forehead and on my chest, and I’ve had my family with dots on their foreheads,” the 77-year-old family patriarch said of the feeling of being in target crosshairs. Courtroom evidence later revealed that federal agents with rifles had camped for days in hills around Bundy’s ranch before and during the showdown on April 12, 2014.

His family and followers were unfairly targeted by heavy-handed government agents, Bundy said, but rescued by backers including militia members and supporters he calls “we the people.”

“They were announcing on their bullhorn: ‘You’re defying a federal court order. We demand you to disperse or we will fire on you,’” said Mike Bronson, 68, a family friend from Midway, Utah, who recalled kneeling in a prayer ring in front of the corral beneath the overpass. “That’s exactly what they said. Time after time.”

The outcome of the tense confrontation reverberated. In January 2016, Bundy’s eldest sons, Ammon and Ryan Bundy, and several other men who were at the Bundy ranch in 2014 led a weekslong standoff at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. It ended with their arrests after a protest spokesperson, LaVoy Finicum, was shot dead by state police at an FBI roadblock.

bundy 2.png
“Revolution is Tradition” appear freshly stenciled on a cement wall, Tuesday, April 9, 2024, in Mesquite, NV beneath a freeway overpass where armed protesters and federal government agents stared each other down through rifle sights 10 years ago. (AP Photo/Ty ONeil)

Some heard echoes of Bunkerville and Malheur when rioters clashed with police on Jan. 6, 2021, outside and inside the halls of Congress and temporarily blocked certification of the 2020 presidential election.

“Bunkerville was an early warning sign of the MAGA/Trump movement,” said Ian Bartrum, a University of Nevada, Las Vegas, law professor who has studied and written about the standoff and federal land policy. He cited “a growing militia movement looking for someone to fight.”

“I think we can safely say, 10 years later, the Bundys won that fight, and federal regulators don’t seem at all eager to try again,” Bartrum said. “We have bigger problems than cattle on public land at this point.”

In court, federal prosecutors cast the Bunkerville confrontation as an insurrection against the U.S. government. Nineteen people from 11 states, including Bundy and four sons, were arrested in 2016 on charges including conspiracy, assault on a federal officer and firearms counts. Most remained jailed for nearly two years.

bundy 2.5.png
Mike Bronson speaks from the Bundy ranch, Tuesday, April 9, 2024, in Bunkerville, NV. (AP Photo/Ty ONeil)

Five defendants pleaded guilty before trial, several were acquitted of all counts and some were convicted of lesser charges. One remains in federal prison. No Bundy family member was convicted of a crime.

Today, family members estimate that more than 700 Bundy cattle graze widely in the scrubby green Virgin River valley surrounding the 160-acre (64.7-hectare) Bundy ranch and in Gold Butte, a scenic and archaeologically rich Mojave Desert expanse half the size of the state of Delaware that then-President Barack Obama designated a national monument in December 2016.

Conservation groups including the Center for Biological Diversity and Western Watersheds Project are suing to prod the government to remove cattle and protect the desert tortoise, a species deemed in 1990 to be threatened by habitat loss that advocates blame on grazing.

“The desert tortoise is at the heart of it,” said Erik Molvar, Western Watersheds executive director. “Cattle continue to graze illegally ... causing irreversible damage to ecological values.”

bundy 3.png
A motorist enters the Gold Butte National Monument near the Bundy ranch, Tuesday, April 9, 2024, in Bunkerville, NV. (AP Photo/Ty ONeil)

“I think you can look at the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 and draw a straight line to Malheur and Bunkerville,” Molvar added, “as emblematic of insurrectionist movements in the United States and the failure of federal prosecutors to fully enforce the laws.”

Bundy argues the federal government does not have authority to regulate lands his Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints family settled some 150 years ago. He insists questions of local sovereignty have never been answered to his satisfaction. He says he believes a jury would agree.

Arden Bundy, the youngest son at age 26, has a social media following with YouTube videos titled “The Bundy Ranch.” Wearing body cameras, he and brother Clancy Bundy and cowhand Cache Burnside ride hard on horseback roping bulls across the scrubby range, aided by the family dog, Kaylie. They call it “gully jumping.”

The April 2014 standoff was a victory, Arden Bundy said, because “nobody got killed and the cows came back.”

Asked what would happen if the government tried again to round up Bundy cattle, he was direct.

“If we have to call people, we’ll call all our followers from YouTube and social media,” Arden Bundy said.

“There was 1,000 there last time,” Cliven Bundy said. “There’ll be 10,000 there next time.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Witnesses later said they feared the sound of a car backfiring would have unleashed a bloodbath. But no shots were fired, the government backed down and some 380 Bundy cattle that had been impounded were set free.

“Since then, we’ve relatively lived in peace,” Ryan Bundy, eldest among 14 Bundy siblings, said in a telephone interview. “The BLM doesn’t contact us, talk to us or bother us.”
Seems like guns have kept government tyranny in check.
 
Because there were Bundy snipers on an overpass
They weren't snipers as they were regular John Does on overwatch with camera teams watching them after the Fed were starting more shit at the standoff. The fed was being pissy that their "citizens" dare to point loaded guns at them and the fed couldn't kill them like they did at Waco for it.
 
I remember hearing about how the BLM (Federal agency, not the grifter group) set up sniper nests during this stand-off. Tell me, why does a agency dedicated to managing federal lands need snipers?
Obama wanted blood, that's why. He DESPERATELY wanted a Ruby Ridge/Waco style blood bath to stick it to conservatives who spoiled his coronation and damaged his narrative of him being the most beloved President ever. He had to settle on his handmaidens sending the Bundys dildos and other sex toys instead because SOMEONE had to remind him how Waco/Ruby Ridge ended with a federal building full of people being blown up in retaliation.
 
Obama wanted blood, that's why. He DESPERATELY wanted a Ruby Ridge/Waco style blood bath to stick it to conservatives who spoiled his coronation and damaged his narrative of him being the most beloved President ever. He had to settle on his handmaidens sending the Bundys dildos and other sex toys instead because SOMEONE had to remind him how Waco/Ruby Ridge ended with a federal building full of people being blown up in retaliation.
Bro, take your meds.
 
Bundy argues the federal government does not have authority to regulate lands his Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints family settled some 150 years ago. He insists questions of local sovereignty have never been answered to his satisfaction. He says he believes a jury would agree.
Based, fuck the BLM that owns like 80% of western land, you crazy bastard. This is Mormon land.
 
Seems like guns have kept government tyranny in check.
Especially the guns the prosecutors shot themselves in the foot with.

They lost a slam-dunk case by failing to turn over evidence to the defense.

That kind of gets forgotten in the wake of the pardon.
 
If it was a major corporation doing these exact same actions instead of Bundy, what would people think?
What do you mean if? Major corporations rack up astronomical fines, tell the government to sit and spin and... they do. As long as nobody is about to lose a secure seat, the government doesn't give a shit.

You might ask why the government doesn't send armed agents to the HQ of Dow Chemical and Alcoa and to Wall Street to forcibly take what they're owed.
 
Sell him the land he's using at a reasonable market price and expand the nature preserve elsewhere to accommodate the need to protect native species. If he wants to use it, he can purchase it.

It's BS to use public property for private cattle grazing without paying for it, but it's also BS to charge him $1 million in fees for the use of the land without getting anything else in return. None of the fees paid are really going back to the local community or to benefit the area as far as I'm aware. These pointless battles when completely reasonable alternatives are available just waste time, effort and money.

Seems fair to all sides if you ask me.
Counter offer. Envirocultists and glowies donate themselves to pig feed so they actually contribute to society in some meaningful way.
 
Based, fuck the BLM that owns like 80% of western land, you crazy bastard. This is Mormon land.
I wish the government would sell off that land but given it is current year non of it would go to local ranchers/local governments/whatever. It would all be sold to the highest bidder all of whom would be some megacorps looking to build unproductive shit like those large data storage centers, massive solar farms, or even to international bidders like the Chinese or Saudis. Don't forget that some Arab states are literally leeching our precious desert water for their own people.
 
I wish the government would sell off that land but given it is current year non of it would go to local ranchers/local governments/whatever. It would all be sold to the highest bidder all of whom would be some megacorps looking to build unproductive shit like those large data storage centers, massive solar farms, or even to international bidders like the Chinese or Saudis. Don't forget that some Arab states are literally leeching our precious desert water for their own people.
I would rather deal with the state of Utah/ wherever owning its own land instead of asking permission to the fed for everything. Literally just sell it to the states. I reject the doomer notion for the simple fact the western states WOULD bid higher. We want our land back, and have for a long time. A chink doesn't have the determination we have.
 
People bitch about him using public land but what the fuck is even the use of public land exactly? I can't just go live on it in a tent or build a public cabin on it despite it supposedly being owned by the public. It's not public land, it's government land they arbitrarily said you can't use for anything other than looking at it.

To keep people for being able to use it. Also for city tards and eco tards peace of mind on a basic level. If you want to get into the longer term deeper reasons. It's to shut off development to as much of the country as possible. Elites and eco tards do not want the western half of the country turning out like the east. (developed) These little controversies are simply to make the eco activist classes happy. Go look up a US map of population, development and federal land.
 
Especially the guns the prosecutors shot themselves in the foot with.

They lost a slam-dunk case by failing to turn over evidence to the defense.

That kind of gets forgotten in the wake of the pardon.
The evidence they "lost" for a few years validated every single one of the claims made by the defense regarding the Feds getting ready to drop the hammer despite the Bundy clan not yet doing anything to warrant it. They absolutely wanted another Waco or Ruby Ridge to remind everyone what happens when you piss off the Feds.
Archive
"The court does regrettably believe a mistrial in this case is the most suitable and only remedy,'' U.S. District Judge Gloria M. Navarro declared, issuing her ruling from the bench before a packed courtroom.

The judge listed six types of evidence that she said prosecutors deliberately withheld before trial, including information about the presence of an FBI surveillance camera on a hill overlooking the Bundy ranch and documents about U.S. Bureau of Land Management snipers outside the ranch.

The others were maps, an FBI log with entries about snipers on standby, threat assessments that indicated the Bundys weren't violent and that the Bureau of Land Management was trying to provoke a conflict by antagonizing them and nearly 500 pages of internal affairs documents involving lead bureau special agent Dan Love, since fired from the agency.

The material, the judge found, would bolster the defense stance that defendant Ryan Payne put a call out for support because the Bundys feared they were surrounded by snipers and felt isolated in early April 2014 before the standoff with federal rangers and officers on April 12, 2014. The federal officers were carrying out a court-ordered roundup of Bundy cattle for failure to pay grazing fees and fines for two decades.

The information also would help refute the government's indictment that alleged the defendants used deceit to draw supporters by "falsely'' contending snipers were posted around the ranch.

"The failure to turn over such evidence violates due process,'' the judge said.

Prosecutors had belittled Ryan Bundy's pretrial motion for information on the "mysterious'' devices outside the family ranch in 2014 as "fantastical'' and a "fishing expedition,'' the judge noted. The government willfully withheld a March 28, 2014, law enforcement operation order and an FBI report that showed there was an FBI camera trained on the Bundy home for surveillance.
The fact the Feds did all of that despite their threat assessments saying the Bundy ranchers wouldn't get violent should really be activating people's almonds. Absolutely everyone should celebrate the fact the Bundys won and the Feds took an L both in the courts and in the grazing fields.
 
Back