US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Tell me how this was supposed to work because Congress had no chance in hell of legally banning slavery with the Southern states being represented in the chamber.

"The South had to secede, because those crazy abolitionists were going to ban slavery and refused to compromise!"

"Haha the North had no chance of ever banning slavery!"

Pick one.

By this logic England would've kept their military installations in the new United States.

I was unaware the colonies were able to peacefully take control of these military installations by asserting their rights in court. I could have sworn there was some kind of war.
 
"The South had to secede, because those crazy abolitionists were going to ban slavery and refused to compromise!"

"Haha the North had no chance of ever banning slavery!"

Pick one.



I was unaware the colonies were able to peacefully take control of these military installations by asserting their rights in court. I could have sworn there was some kind of war.
I usually don't take you for being this ignorant.

The impetus of States' Rights in this is that agreed upon laws (such as Fugitive Slave Act of 1855) were being simply ignored in northern states. As well as the ability of the Southern states to fully represent their interests in the expansion Westward. As attitudes trended towards abolition in the North, rather than use the mechanism of our government to deal with it the North simply denied the South recourse in the matter. This was the final nail in the coffin. If we had a system of representation to settle disputes and mitigate these kind of things in begrudging mutual agreement what is the point of bothering with it if half of the states only honor it when they feel like it?

The addage I always liked is this:
"Slavery may have been the bullet, but States' Rights was the rifle that fired it."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji
Here's how retardedly biased the NY case is:

00163.png

00163 - Copy.png

Joepedo having a meltdown in PA in front of 100 people:
00162.png



00164.png





00165.png



Speaker Johnson is turning into a Romney before our eyes, whatever video they showed of his wife cucking him broke him:

00161.png


 
If we had a system of representation to settle disputes and mitigate these kind of things in begrudging mutual agreement what is the point of bothering with it if half of the states only honor it when they feel like it?

12 of 33 states, representing 20% of the free population of the USA, seceded.

The problem isn't that half the country denied the other half its representation, the problem is that a fifth of the country wanted the right to be treated like it was half when it came to matters under federal jurisdiction, like the governance of territories.

As attitudes trended towards abolition in the North, rather than use the mechanism of our government to deal with it the North simply denied the South recourse in the matter.

No, they didn't. Your recourse in a republic is via elections, and at no point did the North deny Southern states their EC votes, their Senators, or their Representatives. The South revolted because, under the Constitution and its mechanism of government, their shrinking minority would mean that the United States would eventually abolish slavery.

I'll stop here since this not a Civil War thread.
 

Attachments

  • 1713297523067.png
    1713297523067.png
    72.4 KB · Views: 6
Hardest challenge since the Civil War? now I know that the public education system is pretty bad in America but it can't be so bad that someone with, I assume, a decent education hasn't heard of WW1, WW2 or The Cold War or has but considers Israel getting a little pushback for once or Ukraine and Russia having a slav fight a greater challenge than what I listed.

Or he could just be a cunt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back