Debate users @Lidl Drip and @Mr Bones Wild Ride on if skintight leggings are appropriate workout attire.

She's not the steroid freak you think she is.
I didn't accuse her of that. If she's just 160, then her back muscles are much smaller than mine, so I take that back.
Not convinced she's natural though. I'm neutral on it, unless I could see her bloodwork.
Hi the user formerly known as @Albino Blacksheep Refugee here, I don't have time to read this cool thread but I'm just popping in to say that @Mr Bones Wild Ride was before and continues to be my dawg.
Yo WTF you got banned.
I'm sorry to hear, you were fun.
But we still need to know whose sock you were.
Just tell us before you get banned again.

meh you just changed names
NOT FUNNY
NOT EXCITING
 
Last edited:
That's quite inconsiderate!
Your sisters are incredibly well-behaved outside that hugbox.
So, are you a rebel?
I don't really have a dog in this fight, I just wanted to know why Australians were running around barefoot. Which in a way makes this funnier.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AgendaPoster
Oh fuck here we go again . Bones get herpderp2 to slapfight with him she won't fight you deal with it.
For someone "ignoring" me you certainly won't shut up about me. Assmad dogfucking ritard. Lmaooo.
Edit: You have a weird obsession with the males on this forum. You fixate on that derpherp2 dude way too much even though he and I were the ones involved in dispute, keep telling me to block users for some reason even though I clearly don't mind the arguments, and then participate in every slapfight thread I've been in. It's weird and ?desperate. Why do you obsess about who I talk with?
Oh that one's simple. She's assmad her own didn't work. Like lidl's simp.
21321321312.png
Not only did she not notice I actually used the right spelling beforehand. She didn't realize I've been mocking her with shizo and ritard beforehand.
Note how this was before she was getting you to block me btw. This was why they were bitching about how my shit was "elaborate." They literally cannot figure out something so fucking simple as being laughed at.
 
You really expect men not to notice, to not take a glance at that?
Never said I expect that. In fact, I noted that women check out men at the gym, too. #notalletc.

What I said was (again), it's retarded for the original guy to imply that it's women's fault he's committed some sort of self-perceived disloyalty to his wife. It's retarded to claim it's impossible not to be driven mad by a woman in tight clothes at the gym and therefore women should not be there/should wear something else that hides their bodies in order to protect men. The "gym thot" pics you posted were absurd and I am skeptical. I have never seen anyone braless or otherwise dressed like those pics at a gym; if you regularly do, then sorry, but since you seem offended by them, I trust your revulsion at the tackiness (and in at least one of them, the hygiene) will overcome any temptation to stare so long you lose your entire moral compass. Or that you'll choose a different line of sight if it's that threatening to your committed relationship. Or a different gym if the psychic toll is too much.

It's also worth pointing out that the original thing did not provide specifics on the offending clothes in question. I've heard/read people suggesting in various places (here and elsewhere) that leggings or yoga pants are, as a class, offensive, which seems excessively prim. And suggesting that anyone wearing bog-standard leggings at the gym is performing some corrupting jezebel move is too delicate for the world and should just stay home.

it is still a psychic toll to deliberately not look at something that you are hard wired to notice.
"a psychic toll". :lossmanjack::story:

Hey, I'm still mourning the loss of my doggo and so get the sads when I see dogs out for walks on the trails I walk and jog. I specifically do not focus on them and even look elsewhere, even though I am naturally inclined to enjoy watching them be happy. I know many people who have lost dogs are not so bothered, but I am. It's difficult, because all these people just walk their dogs all the time, even though I am here. Should I start a petition on Nextdoor?

I predict "dumb" as your reply (or a really clever white women/dogs joke), but that's the point: it's dumb to blame other people for one's personal regulation issues or "triggers," of whatever sort. If I can't handle being reminded of my dog, then I can stay home, use the space when fewer people are around, or decide to put my eyes on the owner, the trail, my phone, or a shoelace desperately needing retying. Or I can build up my ability to see happy dogs without making it all about me.

a naked woman
Goalposts!

Do you think I am incapable of reading?
Not usually, no. But you seem to have a penchant for recharacterizing what I said and then responding to that. Pretty sure there's a word for that.

Dumb. No one is losing self control
Then what's the concern? That it irritates you?

and then accuse men of being "creepers" for looking.
A separate topic.

I think some of the posters in this thread don't understand that men like myself do not enjoy getting intrusive thoughts and the feelings of shame and guilt that come with them, so if simple rethinking on your attire is all it takes to prevent this, then I think it is more morally considerate to respect the public space before yourself.
No, sir. Adults are supposed to manage ourselves. You don't have to like what other people are wearing at a place you all pay to be (or otherwise have rights to visit). And if someone is violating a dress code, fine, enforce the dress code. But not "oh, men being visually assaulted and it's women's fault for corrupting their most sacred vows [that the women have nothing to do with] and so women should not be allowed to dress in clothes reasonably appropriate to the activity." That's just absurd. Don't like the after-work displays and simply can't tolerate it? Go at a different time...or find a different gym. Or just deal with your own responses to someone who is not doing anything to you.

Note that there has not been a lucid, coherentt argument in rebuttal to this contention. This sort of in your face exhibitionism mightbe somewhat acceptable if it were not paired with this attitude where these girls chomp at thr bit to feign outrage that men might glance or otherwuse notice all therel bits hanging out. A couple more pics. I am not at all certain whether they require spoilers or not, which alone is telling.
I was working. But I also didn't see anything in your pivot topic of interest (women being hyper-sensitive to men noticing them*) to respond to.

*But to that point, I'm not an advocate of hyper-sensitivity, and yes, I think people noticing others (yes, even thinking "that person is hot and I just imagined them naked") is normal and not a crime. It's also possible to notice and not get sucked into perfidy. There's also something of a spectrum between noticing and drooling.
 
@Friend of Dorothy Parker, breifly skimming your response, I feel like you are being wilfully obtuse at the greater context in which this exchangeis taking place. The original post, to which some man-hatimg, nutter bitch added "I hate men," does not include photos, nor much of a description of what the woman looked like or was wearing. It is possible what she was wearing was unremarkable, but my experience and what one sees on social media and the Internet strongly suggests her appearancecvprovocative at worst and borderline indecent.

Why should people have to change gym memberships? Getting in and sticking it to a routine is hard enough. You also did not address whether protruding nipples, presenting like a baboons ass in heat, or moist camel toe is acceptable in public, even as you use the phrase "reasonably appropriate." It's not, at least not what I and others are talking about, and if it is, then women just have to expect interest and attention from men, some of whom they will fancy, others not.

To illustrate the moist camel toe phenomenon, I present a gif of a Broncos cheerleader on Sunday Night football that happened over ten years ago. I still remember seeing it. Can't really do it justice unless it's on the big screen. The sexual stimulation on display is really no different than what I have seen with my own eyes in person and in social media.

Women can either 1) refrain from these sorts of overt sexual displays, or 2) accept that it will have an effect on men (and some women) and that they will garner all sorts of attention in response.

 
The original post, to which some man-hatimg, nutter bitch added "I hate men," does not include photos, nor much of a description of what the woman looked like or was wearing.
Yes, I pointed that out.

what I and others are talking about (+ the rest of your comment)
The topic was what that guy said and the suggestion that women shouldn't be allowed to wear anything at the gym that some guy will find warms his loins and apparently causes him to feel his marital loyalties are jeopardized. You want to make it about what "gym thots" posing for pics online are wearing. And about how women complain about being looked at. Neither of those was the topic.

And even though not the topic, I did respond to the point about people being offended at people looking at them.

So, on topic, do you think the women at your gym are responsible for and in fact corrupting men with their clothing choices when working out and so they should be required to wear baggy clothes? Should leggings be banned? Tanks over a sports bra, ok or no?

On the flip - Men in muscle shirts with the big arm holes so you can see their chest? Men shirtless playing basketball - dirty teases, or reasonable because shirts vs skins is a holy ritual? Also curious as to your views on men in speedos doing laps at the pool? Male roadbikers in bikeshorts?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Pobblebonk
Wait till you notice how it was only all your posts that got moved here
Lol. Lmao even - yeah, your predictions from Page 3 paid off.

They're going after @Otterly in the PickMe thread again but all of my posts calling out @Lidl Drip's pick me behaviour (and the replies) were removed to this thread.
So it's not a rule about "don't infight" - there is a very clear rule about making sure Lidl's hugbox is absolutely never disrupted.
:story: -All well lmao

Before this descends into another @AgendaPoster thirst thread, I just want to say that I disagree with Head Janny here:
Retarded Take.jpg
There is always disagreement on this site.
If you disagree with someone you have two choices:
  1. Ignore them
  2. Refute them
I've done both but I prefer 2 because at least you can try to understand the others perspective. And yeah, I do also enjoy arguing, slinging slander, and trolling because it is fun.

I started a huge fight with a whole bunch of male users about 2.5 weeks ago and I reckon that was extremely productive despite what you would expect. We've all either moved to just ignoring eachother or became friendly and that was a lot of fun arguing and shitposting together.
As long as you're not a gibbering retard, you can have a slapfight thread where you reach an "agree to disagree" scenario even if you've spent days attacking one another. It's not that fucking hard to do.

What hasn't occurred as a result of that thread is passive aggressive seething, random outbursts of animosity, and unrelenting resentment which is the scenario that I believe is about to now occur to me.
This is the usual M.O for anyone that finds themselves on the opposite side of @Lidl Drip.

Because she likes to attack people, but refuses to engage further upon any kind of pushback - you end up in the shitty position above and this will keep happening unless she stays in her hugboxes the whole time or she gets told to stop picking fights with people.
If she doesn't want to argue with people, she should just ignore anything she doesn't like instead of burdening people with her idiotic takes and then reporting people who pushback.

TL : DR @Lidl Drip is a fat whale femcel cunt and I look forward to saying that at every single opportunity. Purely because I can. Lmao.
 
Last edited:
So, on topic, do you think the women at your gym are responsible for and in fact corrupting men with their clothing choices when working out and so they should be required to wear baggy clothes? Should leggings be banned? Tanks over a sports bra, ok or no?
This was addressed when @Mr Bones Wild Ride tried to characterize my position. I don't think women should wear burkas or look like nuns or amsish girls, but the sort of thing I have documented at length is sexually provocative, and to pretend it is not or that men should just to avert their eyes from that sort of titillation justu flies in the face of nature.
As far as I can tell, leggings, tank top over a sports bra runs a wide gambit, some of which seems fine, some of it what is depicted in the memes.
On the flip - Men in muscle shirts with the big arm holes so you can see their chest? Men shirtless playing basketball - dirty teases, or reasonable because shirts vs skins is a holy ritual? Also curious as to your views on men in speedos doing laps at the pool? Male roadbikers in bikeshorts?
Right except men and women are different. Despite being subject to the proliferation of porn and being encouraged to abandon all sexual restraint, women still do not respond to physical stimuli the way men do. Women might appreciate a well muscled guy in a tank top, but it is NOT the same thing as the sort of thing in the Broncos cheerleader gif. I have never seen anything that rises to the level of protruding nipples, baboons ass, moist cameltoe in men, that's probably because 1) im not gay 2) men don't halfway expose their genitalia or butt cheeks (maybe they do in gay gyms, I would not know).
Remember me mentioning how indecent exposure from the likes of Amanda Seyfried or Lindsay Lohan are different than if a man does pretty much the exact same thing? Same principle applies. If a man did that kind of thing, he would be a sex offender and go to jail. Women do that, unless they are really ugly, it dials into the basic of evolutionary psychology.
Pro tip, if it is the subject of a Lainey Molnar cartoon, always go in the opposite direction of what that harlot adcocates.
GLfTCevWUAEgtKM (1).jpeg
 
Last edited:
There are few things that turn a man on more than courageous women
Eh, I didn't @him, I assume he has better shit to do than read this thread (?🌈¿) and I highly doubt he gives a fuck (nor should he) about RandomUser #164463's opinion on how he operates his own website.

That post was more me thinking outloud about how retarded @Lidl Drip is and why I think this shit is going to continue.
 
Eh, I didn't @him, I assume he has better shit to do than read this thread (?🌈¿) and I highly doubt he gives a fuck (nor should he) about RandomUser #164463's opinion on how he operates his own website.
Oh I’m sure he has probably already read through this And no no matter what you say his mind will never change.
 
Back