Opinion No Black WNBA players have a signature shoe. Here's why that's a gigantic problem.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Mike Freeman
USA TODAY
Published: 6:46 a.m. ET April 22, 2024 Updated: 9:38 a.m. ET April 22, 2024

In October of 2023, after Game 1 of the WNBA Finals, Las Vegas Aces coach Becky Hammon was asked a question: Does star player A'ja Wilson deserve her own signature shoe? Hammon's response was one of incredulity.

"You think?" she said. "You don’t need my thoughts. You already know my thoughts."

Then she gave her thoughts.

"She needs her own shoe," Hammon said. "She is the two-time MVP. I’ll toot her horn because she won’t. Olympic gold medalist, best defensive player two years running, her team’s (success). Stop. Stop."

Wilson's pedigree goes even beyond what Hammon described. She's been in the league since 2018. She's a two-time champion, won the MVP twice, and is a five-time All-Star. She's an Olympian. FIBA World Cup MVP. Wilson won a championship at South Carolina and was player of the year there. She's so revered in her home state there's a statue of her outside the arena.Wilson also just made Time Magazine's 100 Most Influential People in the World list. Oh, and she's a New York Times bestselling author.

Wilson is one of the greatest stars of our time. Any athlete of her caliber should already have a signature shoe. It is the order of things. In fact, it should have happened years ago. It would be like if you made signature shoes for Vulcans and you didn't give one to Spock.

1713813654076.png
In 2022, Las Vegas Aces forward A'ja Wilson told ESPN.com that the WNBA promotes only the players it thinks are marketable and “sometimes a Black woman doesn’t check off those boxes.” Candice Ward, USA TODAY Sports

"In due time, in due time," Wilson said of the shoe, at that 2023 press conference. "We’ll see what goes on, but in due time I believe we’re going to get something moving and shaking. But I’m blessed just to have my name in that conversation.

"A lot of players don’t get signature shoes so for people to say I should or demanding that I get one, I’m blessed to be in that situation. So, in due time, we’ll see ..."

That was last year. It hasn't happened yet. It likely will but the fact it hasn't yet is absolutely disgraceful. But there's something even worse occurring.

Wilson's lack of a signature shoe is getting a fresh look because Caitlin Clark is expected to get a signature shoe in the near future. If she does, Clark would join only three other WNBA players with signature shoes: Breanna Stewart, Elena Delle Donne and Sabrina Ionescu. You may notice a pattern there.

In a majority-Black league there are currently no Black players with signature shoes.

There've only been 12 players in the history of the WNBA with their own signature shoe. In the past, almost every signature shoe from 1995-2011 belonged to a Black woman. The fact that only white women hold the power of the signature shoe now, as the WNBA enters its most high profile and prosperous phase, shows how Black women are being ignored in a league that they dominate.

Stardom propels shoe deals, but also, shoe contracts, like a signature shoe, drive stardom. If you believe the only reason three (and likely soon four) white women are getting the shoes because they just happen to be more marketable, well, you're a fool.

Wilson didn't make Time's list because she isn't marketable and doesn't have viability. She made it because she has copious amounts of both.

"A'ja Wilson is not just an incredible athlete, she is also an inspiration to all who witness her talent and drive. Her journey is a testament to the power of passion and fearlessness in achieving greatness," Tom Brady wrote in an essay for the magazine praising Wilson.

Brady added: "A'ja Wilson is not just a champion; she is a symbol of resilience, compassion, and unwavering dedication. Her story is a reminder that with passion and fearlessness, anyone can achieve greatness."

And before a bunch of you fire up your AOL email and "sent from my iPad" accounts, to be clear, crystal clear, really really clear, this is nothing against Clark. Clark deserves every endorsement she's getting. However, Wilson deserves it more, and has for some time. She is, after all, the best overall player in the world.

What so much of this comes down to is a lack of respect for the Black women of the WNBA. A lack of respect for Black Americans overall isn't something new to the marketing world. This is old hat. That doesn't change the ugliness of it.

Everyone knows this including the white stars in the sport like Paige Bueckers from Connecticut. She addressed the problem three years ago during her acceptance speech at the ESPYS after she was named best women's athlete.

"With the light that I have now as a white woman who leads a Black-led sport and celebrated here, I want to shed a light on Black women," said Bueckers. "They don’t get the media coverage that they deserve. They’ve given so much to the sport, the community and society as a whole and their value is undeniable.

"I think it’s time for change. Sports media holds the key to storylines. Sports media and sponsors tell us who is valuable, and you have told the world that I mattered today, and everyone who voted, thank you. But I think we should use this power together to also celebrate Black women."

"Even though our league is predominantly Black, I think it's hard for our league to push us, in a sense, because they still have to market, in their mind, what is marketable," Wilson told ESPN in 2022. "Sometimes a Black woman doesn't check off those boxes."

Yes, it's true, that it's likely Wilson will get her signature shoe, and maybe soon. It won't change the fact she had to wait this long. And it doesn't diminish that she could still be the only Black player to have one.

Source (Archive)
 
There've only been 12 players in the history of the WNBA with their own signature shoe. In the past, almost every signature shoe from 1995-2011 belonged to a Black woman. The fact that only white women hold the power of the signature shoe now, as the WNBA enters its most high profile and prosperous phase, shows how Black women are being ignored in a league that they dominate.

So something thats extremely rare and "prestigious" that only 12 have existed since the WNBA started and its only an issue now because a White girl got a shoe? Their very stat says that black women had most of the shoes for over a decade.
 
So something thats extremely rare and "prestigious" that only 12 have existed since the WNBA started and its only an issue now because a White girl got a shoe? Their very stat says that black women had most of the shoes for over a decade.
White people being allowed to have anything ever is unacceptable to these people. They're racists in the most literal sense, driven by hatred moreso than any white slave-owner in this nation's history.
 
And before a bunch of you fire up your AOL email and "sent from my iPad" accounts, to be clear, crystal clear, really really clear, this is nothing against Clark
With that much prefacing, you just know the statement at the end is a lie. They tried very hard to sell it but we're not buying it.

Show some butthole online if you wanna sell shoes.
 
Fuck that. Then nike will spend $3 per pair of shoes in china to make shit tier shoes that sell for $400 in the US by sweatshop workers making 10 cents a day so some ghetto 15 year olds can get their parents to buy them/steal them only to end up getting high and drunk, puking on them and ending up in this situation:
Ain't no ghetto queen wanting that shit to deal with on her $19000 a year salary
 
Sneaker culture is the most bottom-tier consoooooooomerist shit.

KGibes' toy collection looks like a fine use of the American dollar in combination with spending $400 on a pair of shoes made from plastic shit out by a machine that was designed to shit out little plastic turds so that joggers can feel more important than other joggers wearing shoes shit out by a different machine.
 
Maybe if they were entertaining enough not to be entirely subsidized by the NBA and still be in the red, there would be a nigress or two with a signature shoe, but alas, nobody knows who the fuck they are, because nobody watches the WNBA.
Now, counter to that, tens of millions tuned in to watch Caitlin Clark play in the NCAA Women's tournament, which got MORE eyes than the WNBA Finals ever hope to get.
Nike is not going to give out a signature shoe to an athlete that nobody fuckin' knows, no matter how good they are, that's just not how marketing works.

I don't know why these bitches are jealous, as Caitlin Clark is just going to fade into obscurity as a WNBA player anyways, no matter how good she may be.

If these other bitches actually want their own shoe, then they should learn to finally fuckin' dunk.
 
No Black, Trans, Obese, Autistic, Down Syndrome, Mixed Race, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Bahai Faith, Zoroastrian, Atheist, Rastafarian, Latinx, Palestinian, Diabetic, Sex Offender, Incel, Gay, under 5'6, MAP, TradCath, Cottagecore, Israeli, Asian, Anorexic, Blind, Deaf, Transracial, Transabled, Demented, PTSD-ridden, Mass Shooter, Loona Stan, /v/irgin, soyjaker, Singaporean, Albanian WNBA players have a signature shoe. Here's why that's a gigantic problem.
 
Back