Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[Adamska]

Again, chaos theory says there's only an appearance of randomness in chaotic systems. There are underlying patterns/equations that create order in the chaos: ordo ab chao is an ancient motto and prevelant in Freemasonry. There is complexity and organizing principles. And the BIGGEST program/algorithm that's running in Nature on Earth is GOD=7_4. This explains why there are 7 continents commonly refered to, although a small number reduce this to 4 'super-continents': America, Afro-Eurasia, Austalia, and Antartica. GOD=7_4 also explains why there are 4 oceans commonly refered to, although a small number expand this to 7 oceans: North Pacific, South Pacific, North Atlantic, South Atlantic, Indian, Artic, and Southern.

Uh-huh. That's why we have models that predict it'll wind up like this:

There are principles in why plates move and why some subduct while others diverge. It entirely has to do with the convection flow of the mantle and the material the plate's made of. No spurious and worthless mumbo-jumbo here.

And those boundaries you arbitrarily selected is why cartographers also refer to a single "World Ocean" as well as providing non-7/4 variations of your continents ya liar and fraud.

 

[Theturnip]

Research M-theory (superstrings theory, supergravity theory); they answer your question. I did not discover those theories - far from it. I just took their simpest explanation through the equation of...

6D or 7D hyperspace + 4 common dimensions = 10 or 11 dimensions of spacetime
​

and added the...

6 or 7 aspects of regular time + 4 aspects of hypertime
​

thus producing...

3D rs + 7D hs + 7a rt + 4a ht = 21D/a st
or
3D rs + 6D hs + 6a rt + 4a ht = 19D/a st​

Current supersymmetric string theory does NOT unify Gravity with the other 3 forces Brad. M-Theory isn't even a coherent theory in the scientific meaning of the term, it's a conjecture that 5 of the current internally consistent (but not actually demonstrated) string theories are all limits of an underlying larger theory.

Furthermore, of the 5 theories that can constitute M, you do NOT have agreement as to the number of dimentions, ranging from 7 to 26.

Furthermore, as far as I'm aware (although I'm no theoretical physicist) no current theory has yet managed to come up with a consistent "geography" of planck space.

 

[YankeeTrader]

Brad doesn't know about Atlantis. The dude needs to read more Aquaman.

What about Man from Atlantis with Patrick Duffy?

 

[bacterium]

I bet the band played the NASA conference he's always going on about.

Eventually it will be "I didn't actually go to the conference, but I heard it was in town. So I hung posters on telephone poles." Followed by "I never lied about it! That was how I remembered it! You are an eeEEEeeeEeEvyl liar!"

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Everyone,*

I really must STOP arguing with antichrists who aren't going to change their stance. Religion and politics have been known to create arguments and disagreement since modern man began. Now when I add cutting-edge science, we get a BIGGER mess!

This forum is set-up to make fun of people; it's for Internet bullies to come together in a circle-jerk to anonymously pick on someone - in this case, me. I really must ignore those who will never be converted to anything other than what they already believe in.

If you look at the "7 Seals"/theories you'll find some science that's hard to confirm anytime soon, i.e. Seal #1 of the Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another univese. That's going to be hard to prove through experimentation unless the Government is keeping wormholes - natural and artificial ('stargates') - secret. (I believe they are keeping them secret.) But the prediction/prophecy of the "New World" - the Planet Nestor - is very specific. When this planet is confirmed, what will all my detracters say?


*Synchronism: 17:16 "If you see this steady drumbeat." - CNN

 

[Overchek]

Everyone,*

I really must STOP arguing with antichrists who aren't going to change their stance. Religion and politics have been known since modern man began to create arguments and disagreement. Now when I add cutting-edge science, we get a BIGGER mess!

This forum is set-up to make fun of people; it's for Internet bullies to come together in a circle-jerk to anonamously pick on someone - in this case, me. I really must ignore those who will never be converted to anything other than what they already believe in.

If you look at the "7 Seals"/theories you'll find some science that's hard to confirm anytime soon, i.e. Seal #1 of the Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another univese. That's going to be hard to prove anytime soon unless the Government is keeping wormholes - natural and artificial ('stargates') - secret. (I believe they are keeping them secret.) But the prediction/prophecy of the "New World" - the Planet Nestor - is very specific. When this planet is confirmed, what will all my detracters say?


*Synchronism: 17:16 "If you see this steady drumbeat." - CNN

Wow, that's great Richard.

 

[YankeeTrader]

I really must STOP arguing with antichrists who aren't going to change their stance. Religion and politics have been known since modern man began to create arguments and disagreement. Now when I add cutting-edge science, we get a BIGGER mess!

So you'll be leaving us then?

This forum is set-up to make fun of people; it's for Internet bullies to come together in a circle-jerk to anonamously pick on someone - in this case, me. I really must ignore those who will never be converted to anything other than what they already believe in.

Look who's talking. The word you were trying to spell up there was anonymously.

But the prediction/prophecy of the "New World" - the Planet Nestor - is very specific. When this planet is confirmed, what will all my detracters say?

Even if they do find a planet that remotely fits your parameters, odds are you'll still manage to fuck it up. And it's spelled detractors. Christ! Learn to spell already!

 

[Batman VS Tony Danza]

Everyone,*

I really must STOP arguing with antichrists who aren't going to change their stance. Religion and politics have been known since modern man began to create arguments and disagreement. Now when I add cutting-edge science, we get a BIGGER mess!

This forum is set-up to make fun of people; it's for Internet bullies to come together in a circle-jerk to anonamously pick on someone - in this case, me. I really must ignore those who will never be converted to anything other than what they already believe in.

If you look at the "7 Seals"/theories you'll find some science that's hard to confirm anytime soon, i.e. Seal #1 of the Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another univese. That's going to be hard to prove anytime soon unless the Government is keeping wormholes - natural and artificial ('stargates') - secret. (I believe they are keeping them secret.) But the prediction/prophecy of the "New World" - the Planet Nestor - is very specific. When this planet is confirmed, what will all my detracters say?


*Synchronism: 17:16 "If you see this steady drumbeat." - CNN

If you're honestly trying to inform people about your views then why not just make a youtube channel and do speeches and Q&As in vlogs?

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

If you look at the "7 Seals"/theories you'll find some science that's hard to confirm anytime soon, i.e. Seal #1 of the Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another univese. That's going to be hard to prove anytime soon unless the Government is keeping wormholes - natural and artificial ('stargates') - secret. (I believe they are keeping them secret.)

How do you know about these things if science is unable to confirm them?

Edit:
If your goal is to spread your word and convince nay-sayers you really need to step up your game.
As I have pointed out before, you do a poor job at defending your claims and behave like a petulant child in a tantrum. How do you think you'll be taken seriously when you do that?
How do you expect people to believe you when you're perpetually unable to hold up even the slightest claim you make and get caught lying every second page.

 

[YankeeTrader]

How do you know about these things if science is unable to confirm them?

Cause his inner Christ told him?

 

[Graffiti canvas]

Everyone,*

I really must STOP arguing with antichrists who aren't going to change their stance. Religion and politics have been known since modern man began to create arguments and disagreement. Now when I add cutting-edge science, we get a BIGGER mess!

This forum is set-up to make fun of people; it's for Internet bullies to come together in a circle-jerk to anonamously pick on someone - in this case, me. I really must ignore those who will never be converted to anything other than what they already believe in.

If you look at the "7 Seals"/theories you'll find some science that's hard to confirm anytime soon, i.e. Seal #1 of the Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another univese. That's going to be hard to prove anytime soon unless the Government is keeping wormholes - natural and artificial ('stargates') - secret. (I believe they are keeping them secret.) But the prediction/prophecy of the "New World" - the Planet Nestor - is very specific. When this planet is confirmed, what will all my detracters say?


*Synchronism: 17:16 "If you see this steady drumbeat." - CNN

Brad, I promise you people might listen if you start connecting your theory to verifiable things that are known.

All great communicators start with a common denominator and build on that.

Honestly at this point I don't know if I should feels sorry for you, or just be ruthlessly insulting until you fuck off back to the void.

 

[Theturnip]

Honestly at this point I don't know if I should feels sorry for you, or just be ruthlessly insulting until you fuck off back to the void.

Ruthlessly insulting him hasn't produced much in the way of results so far.

 

[bacterium]

@Brad Watson_Miami are you willing to change your stance?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Brad, I'm noting that you called me a liar (multiple times, actually) and yet cannot point to one instance where I actually said something untrue.

 

[YankeeTrader]

@Brad Watson_Miami are you willing to change your stance?

 

[AlanRickmanIsDead]

Everyone,*

I really must STOP arguing with antichrists who aren't going to change their stance. Religion and politics have been known since modern man began to create arguments and disagreement. Now when I add cutting-edge science, we get a BIGGER mess!

This forum is set-up to make fun of people; it's for Internet bullies to come together in a circle-jerk to anonamously pick on someone - in this case, me. I really must ignore those who will never be converted to anything other than what they already believe in.

If you look at the "7 Seals"/theories you'll find some science that's hard to confirm anytime soon, i.e. Seal #1 of the Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another univese. That's going to be hard to prove anytime soon unless the Government is keeping wormholes - natural and artificial ('stargates') - secret. (I believe they are keeping them secret.) But the prediction/prophecy of the "New World" - the Planet Nestor - is very specific. When this planet is confirmed, what will all my detracters say?


*Synchronism: 17:16 "If you see this steady drumbeat." - CNN

Brad, do you hear the roar of the Big Wheel? It hungers for your bones, Brad.
It longs to grind them into a fine powder.

 

[Graffiti canvas]

Ruthlessly insulting him hasn't produced much in the way of results so far.

Unfortunately, neither has logical discourse. Almost 700 pages of at least half of the kiwi's posting asking perfectly normal and sometimes well educated questions. Only to be met with more and more distorted leaps of conjecture flown as fact.

 

[YankeeTrader]

Unfortunately, neither has logical discourse. Almost 700 pages of at least half of the kiwi's posting asking perfectly normal and sometimes well educated questions. Only to be met with more and more distorted leaps of conjecture flown as fact.

That's the only think keeping the milk from going sour. His endless sham science shell game is sometimes funny.

 

[AlanRickmanIsDead]

Unfortunately, neither has logical discourse. Almost 700 pages of at least half of the kiwi's posting asking perfectly normal and sometimes well educated questions. Only to be met with more and more distorted leaps of conjecture flown as fact.

We are going on a journey into his mind, a desolate garden of bones and plums.
All glory to the divine corpse of Brad.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

The following is an excerpt from my book in progress Simple(6,74) English(7,74) Gematria(8,74) and GOD=7_4

ἀεὶ ὁ Θεὸς ὁ μέγας γεωμετρεῖ = 3,1,4,1,5,9: the first six digits of pi 3.14159 ​

In researching the history of Greek isopsephy/isophsephia (gematria) - the alphanumeric quality of a language - we are pointed to Pythagoras, the Pythagoreans, and Plato. There is an ancient Greek motto encoded by Plato: "God is ever a geometer" (ἀεὶ ὁ Θεὸς ὁ μέγας γεωμετρεῖ), whereas, counting the letters of the words (3,1,4,1,5,9) reveals the first six digits of pi 3.14159. This confirms that 'Step 1' of Greek gematria was/is simply counting the number of letters in a word/name/phrase with that number having connections and symbolic meaning(7), and that 'Step 2' is the alphanumeric sum of a word/name/phrase with that number having connect74ions and symbolic meaning. Hebrew, Arabic, and English gematrias also use these Steps 1 & 2, i.e. Liberty(7) Bell(4) and John(4) Hancock(7). July 4th = 7/4 and GOD(3)=7_4. The simple fact that the words 'GOD' and 'One' have three letters and Christians traditionally think of the One GOD as the Holy(4) Trinity(7) is no 'coincidence'!

“Mere words of natural significance fail to interpret spiritual ideas unless a figurative meaning is added to them. By type and symbol alone can the essence of truth be conveyed. In myth and parable the poet, prophet and religious leader in all times present to us the realizations of their spiritual sense."
- Gematria by Bligh Bond & Lea​

"It is upon the manipulation of Hebrew letters through their numerical values that much of magic is based" - Three Books of Occult Philosophy - The Foundation Book of Western Occultism, p. 11
by Henry Cornelius Agrippa (Llewellyn's Sourcebook Series, 1993)​

Note: Since ancient Egypt, the mystics have believed that when we spell we cast a spell.

spell=64=S19+P16+E5+L12+L12
test=64=T20+E5+S19+T20