US Universities Struggle as Pro-Palestinian Demonstrations Grow - Dozens were arrested Monday at N.Y.U. and Yale, but officials there and at campuses across the country are running out of options to corral protests that are expected to last the rest of the school year.

Universities Struggle as Pro-Palestinian Demonstrations Grow
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Alan Blinder
2024-04-23 04:48:02GMT

ny01.jpg
Police arrest protesters outside of New York University on Monday night. Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times

At New York University, the police swept in to arrest protesting students on Monday night, ending a standoff with the school’s administration.

At Yale, the police placed protesters’ wrists into zip ties on Monday morning and escorted them onto campus shuttles to receive summonses for trespassing.

Columbia kept its classroom doors closed on Monday, moving lectures online and urging students to stay home.

Harvard Yard was shut to the public. Nearby, at campuses like Tufts and Emerson, administrators weighed how to handle encampments that looked much like the one that the police dismantled at Columbia last week — which protesters quickly resurrected. And on the West Coast, a new encampment bubbled at the University of California, Berkeley.

Less than a week after the arrests of more than 100 protesters at Columbia, administrators at some of the country’s most influential universities were struggling, and largely failing, to calm campuses torn by the conflict in Gaza and Israel.

ny02.jpg
Despite arrests at Columbia last week, protests continued on campus on Monday.Credit...C.S. Muncy for The New York Times

During the turmoil on Monday, which coincided with the start of Passover, protesters called on their universities to become less financially tied to Israel and its arms suppliers. Many Jewish students agonized anew over some protests and chants that veered into antisemitism, and feared again for their safety. Some faculty members denounced clampdowns on peaceful protests and warned that academia’s mission to promote open debate felt imperiled. Alumni and donors raged.

And from Congress, there were calls for the resignation of Columbia’s president, Nemat Shafik, from some of the same lawmakers Dr. Shafik tried to pacify last week with words and tactics that inflamed her own campus.

The menu of options for administrators handling protests seems to be quickly dwindling. It is all but certain that the demonstrations, in some form or another, will last on some campuses until the end of the academic year, and even then, graduation ceremonies may be bitterly contested gatherings.

For now, with the most significant protests confined to a handful of campuses, the administrators’ approaches sometimes seem to shift from hour to hour.

“I know that there is much debate about whether or not we should use the police on campus, and I am happy to engage in those discussions,” Dr. Shafik said in a message to students and employees early Monday, four days after officers dressed in riot gear helped clear part of Columbia’s campus.

“But I do know that better adherence to our rules and effective enforcement mechanisms would obviate the need for relying on anyone else to keep our community safe,” she added. “We should be able to do this ourselves.”

Protesters have demonstrated with varying intensity since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. But this particular round of unrest began to gather greater force last Wednesday, after Columbia students erected an encampment, just as Dr. Shafik was preparing to testify before Congress.

At that hearing in Washington, before a Republican-led House committee, she vowed to punish unauthorized protests on the private university’s campus more aggressively, and the next day, she asked the New York Police Department to clear the encampment. In addition to the more than 100 people arrested, Columbia suspended many students. Many Columbia professors, students and alumni voiced fears that the university was stamping out free debate, a cornerstone of the American college experience.

The harsher approach helped lead to more protests outside Columbia’s gates, where Jewish students reported being targeted with antisemitic jeers and described feeling unsafe as they traveled to and from their campus.

The spiraling uproar in Upper Manhattan helped fuel protests on some other campuses.

“We’re all a united front,” said Malak Afaneh, a law student protesting at University of California, Berkeley. “This was inspired by the students at Columbia who, in my opinion, are the heart of the student movement whose bravery and solidarity with Palestine really inspired us all.”

The events at Columbia also rippled to Yale, where students gathered at Beinecke Plaza in New Haven, Conn., for days to demand that the university divest from arms manufacturers.

Yale’s president, Peter Salovey, said Monday that university leaders had spent “many hours” in talks with the protesters, with an offer that included an audience with the trustee who oversees Yale’s Corporation Committee on Investor Responsibility. But university officials had decided late Sunday that the talks were proving unsuccessful, and Dr. Salovey said, they were troubled by reports “that the campus environment had become increasingly difficult.”

The authorities arrested 60 people on Monday morning, including 47 students, Dr. Salovey said. The university said the decision to make arrests was made with “the safety and security of the entire Yale community in mind and to allow access to university facilities by all members of our community.”

In the hours after the arrests, though, hundreds of protesters blocked a crucial intersection in New Haven.

ny03.jpg
Students protesters occupied an intersection near the campus of Yale University on Monday.Credit...Adrian Martinez Chavez for The New York Times

“We demand that Yale divests!” went one chant.

“Free Palestine!” went another.

Far from being cowed by the police, protesters suggested that the response at Beinecke Plaza had emboldened them.

“It’s pretty appalling that the reaction to students exercising their freedom of speech and engaging in peaceful protest on campus grounds — which is supposed to be our community, our campus — the way that Yale responds is by sending in the cops and having 50 students arrested,” said Chisato Kimura, a law student at Yale.

The scene was less contentious in Massachusetts, where Harvard officials had moved to limit the possibility of protests by closing Harvard Yard, the 25-acre core of the campus in Cambridge, through Friday. Students were warned that they could face university discipline if they, for instance, erected unauthorized tents or blocked building entrances.

On Monday, Harvard’s Palestine Solidarity Committee said on social media that the university had suspended it. National Students for Justice in Palestine, a loose confederation of campus groups, said it believed the decision was “clearly intended to prevent students from replicating the solidarity encampments” emerging across the United States. Harvard said in a statement that it was “committed to applying all policies in a content-neutral manner.”

Elsewhere in the Boston area, protesters had set up encampments at Emerson College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Tufts University. But those protests, for now, appeared more modest than the ones at Yale and in New York, where demonstrators constructed an encampment outside N.Y.U.’s Stern School of Business.

ny04.jpg
Protesters outside of New York University, before police arrived.Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times
ny05.jpg
“Students, students, hold your ground!” protesters roared. “N.Y.U., back down!”Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times

N.Y.U. officials tolerated the demonstration for hours but signaled Monday night that their patience was wearing thin. Police officers gathered near the protest site as demonstrators ignored a 4 p.m. deadline to vacate it. As nightfall approached, sirens blared and officers, donning helmets and bearing zip ties, mustered. Prisoner transport vans waited nearby.

“Students, students, hold your ground!” protesters roared. “N.Y.U., back down!”

Soon enough, police officers marched on the demonstration.

“Today’s events did not need to lead to this outcome,” said John Beckman, a university spokesman in a statement. But, he said, some protesters, who may not have been from N.Y.U., breached barriers and refused to leave. Because of safety concerns, the university said it asked for assistance from the police.

At Columbia, Dr. Shafik ordered Monday’s classes moved online “to de-escalate the rancor.”

She did not immediately detail how the university would proceed in the coming days, beyond saying that Columbia officials would be “continuing discussions with the student protesters and identifying actions we can take as a community to enable us to peacefully complete the term.”

Some students and faculty members said support for Dr. Shafik was eroding, with the university senate preparing for the possibility of a vote this week to censure the president. Supporters of the censure complained that Dr. Shafik was sacrificing academic freedom to appease critics.

But Dr. Shafik was castigated on Monday by the very people she was accused of appeasing when at least 10 members of the U.S. House of Representatives demanded her resignation.

“Over the past few days, anarchy has engulfed Columbia University,” Representative Elise Stefanik, Republican of New York and one of Dr. Shafik’s chief interrogators last week, wrote with other lawmakers. “As the leader of this institution, one of your chief objectives, morally and under law, is to ensure students have a safe learning environment. By every measure, you have failed this obligation.”

A university spokesperson said that Dr. Shafik was focused on easing the strife and that she was “working across campus with members of the faculty, administration, and board of trustees, and with state, city, and community leaders, and appreciates their support.”

Amid the acrimony, and with scores of green, blue and yellow tents filling the Columbia encampment, parts of the campus sometimes took on an eerie, surreal quiet on a splendid spring day.

ny06.jpg
Some faculty members said support for Dr. Shafik was eroding.Credit...CS Muncy for The New York Times
ny07.jpg
At Columbia, many Jewish students stayed away from campus for Passover.Credit...Bing Guan for The New York Times

The unease was never all that far away, though, even with many Jewish students away from campus for Passover.

“When Jewish students are forced to watch others burning Israeli flags, calling for bombing of Tel Aviv, calling for Oct. 7 to happen over and over again, it creates an unacceptable degree of fear that cannot be tolerated,” Representative Daniel Goldman, Democrat of New York, said outside Columbia’s Robert K. Kraft Center for Jewish Student Life.

By then, in another symbol of the crisis enveloping Columbia, Mr. Kraft, an alumnus and owner of the New England Patriots, had launched his own broadside and suggested he would pause his giving.

“I am no longer confident that Columbia can protect its students and staff,” he wrote in a statement, “and I am not comfortable supporting the university until corrective action is taken.”
 
70k a year?? That is an absolutely insane amount of money. I know they have scholarships and stuff but how can that be justified? For humanities subjects it’s just people talking at you. I guess for medicine you have to maintain a medical school which isn’t cheap but 70k a year for regular subjects is crazy.
Does it include lodgings?? Food? For that I’d want the knowledge beamed directly to my brain and lobster for dinner every day
government-backed loans are a hell of a drug
 
I’m kind of amused that politicians believe Israel will always be a USA ally. With the times and this youth, it’s gone in ten years, tops.

Rightoid kids don’t wanna die for it and only care about the border. Leftoids just want murder them all. Thanks, blue think tanks! Good job! Hope all the racial unrest and constant IDpol to ruin Trump was worth it!
They'll stay in their bubbles while blaming the other side for turning the youth against Israel.
 
Three arrests at Cal Poly, school is closed until Wednesday.


The school's not that big. I'd find out who these people are and expel them, in addition to everything I already said.

Other students are there to learn, and shutting down school for a few days is fucking up everyone's education.
The arrests literally don’t matter. Pretty sure 99% of people who got arrested for protests got let out with nothing.


As long as you align as democrat, you can just do whatever the fuck you want. At least until November, anyway.
 
Student Editorial Boards Rebuke College Officials for Protest Decisions
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Anna Betts and Jonathan Wolfe
2024-04-23 21:22:52GMT
As protests over the Israel-Hamas war have erupted at U.S. universities in recent months, student journalists have been reporting daily on campus debates over free speech, university investments and America’s involvement in the conflict.

Some student newspapers’ editorial boards have offered assessments of their campus disputes. They have opined on how administrators are responding to protesters and defended the rights of students to speak out. They have been particularly vocal about the threats of harassment and doxxing, which they have argued were stifling free speech on campus.

Here are a few of the editorials that have been written by student newspapers in the last couple of weeks as tensions have escalated at several campuses.

Columbia University
Columbia’s crisis is not as the committee has attempted to define it — a characterization stemming from the belief that the University has become a hotbed of antisemitic thought and behavior. Rather, the crisis is rooted in a lack of genuine community engagement on the part of the administration, as well as a failure to fulfill its duty of care to all affiliates.

Columbia Spectator

The editorial board at the Columbia Daily Spectator published an editorial just hours after Nemat Shafik, the university president, called the police onto campus last week to empty an encampment of pro-Palestinian demonstrators. More than 100 students were arrested, causing an uproar among the school community.

In the strongly worded editorial, published on April 18 and titled “Is Columbia in crisis?”, the students on the editorial board wrote that the school administration had “failed to genuinely engage with its students, faculty, and staff,” and that the university was slowly becoming a “space of distrust, suppression, and fear.”

By inviting the New York Police Department onto the campus, and allowing the police to arrest over 100 students, Dr. Shafik, who goes by Minouche, had disrupted campus life and infringed “on her supposedly paramount principle of safety,” the board wrote.

The board also criticized the administration for its congressional testimony last week before the Republican-led House Committee on Education and the Workforce: “Shafik and her fellow administrators were all too willing to succumb to pressure from representatives, essentially conflating pro-Palestinian campus activism with antisemitism and repeatedly condemning the words and actions of both students and faculty to appease committee members.”

Speaking directly to school officials, the editorial board added: “You must confront your failure to fulfill your duty of protecting and representing your students and their concerns. Otherwise, you will further marginalize, endanger, and distance your students, indefinitely trapping Columbia in its self-inflicted crisis.”

The University of Michigan
The answer to the current campus climate is to ease tensions on both sides: the University and the students. That means truly facilitating dialogue instead of threatening to silence it.

The Michigan Daily

The Michigan Daily’s editorial board this month discussed the rising tensions on campus as school officials tried to clamp down on pro-Palestinian protests and calls for divestment from Israel.

In March, about 100 student protesters at Michigan disrupted a university event and protested the school’s investment in companies they said were profiting from Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The police in Ann Arbor, Mich., cited three students, according to The Michigan Daily.

A few days later, the university president, Santa Ono, along with the Board of Regents, released a draft of a Disruptive Activity Policy, which restricted activities that disrupted the “free flow of persons about campus” or university operations.

In an editorial, “Santa Ono, don’t silence student voices,” The Michigan Daily board wrote that the “campus is becoming a pressure cooker” and that “the more the University clamps down on student voices, the louder and more impassioned they will become.”

Cornell University
Unfortunately and unsurprisingly, the current administration doesn’t seem to see Cornell’s mission as anything other than that of a profit-making machine. As student and faculty protests have expanded, President Martha Pollack and the administration have responded by cracking down and condemning when they should really be engaging and listening. Instead of considering the views of the student body, staff and faculty — the very people who breathe life into the Cornell community — Pollack has consistently deferred to conservative donors and congressional crooks.

The Cornell Daily Sun

The editorial board of The Cornell Daily Sun last week endorsed calls for Cornell to divest from arms manufacturers directly involved in the Israel-Hamas war.

“The Sun wholeheartedly endorses the pro-side of both questions and joins the call for Cornell University to divest from arms manufacturers directly involved in what the International Court of Justice has called a ‘plausible’ genocide,” the editorial board wrote. “Cornell should in no way support a war that has been waged with callous disregard for civilian lives.”

“It’s time for Cornell to lead the way, call for a cease-fire and pull our money out of investments in potential war crimes,” it added.

Harvard University
Cracking down on this nonviolent protest group will only inflame community relations at a time when the opposite is needed. By forcing the PSC — and, due to its own club recognition freeze, several of the PSC’s partners — to operate underground, Harvard further alienates pro-Palestinian students, compromising its ability to engage with them constructively. The chaos at Columbia, in no small part a result of the University suspending student advocacy groups last semester, makes that much clear.

The Harvard Crimson

The Harvard Crimson reported on Monday that the Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee, a student organization, had been suspended for the rest of the spring term after the group held a rally on Friday to support the protesters at Columbia. The university said the group ran afoul of campus protest guidelines.

On Tuesday, the Crimson’s editorial board denounced that decision.

“On a campus where, from the start, administrators did too little too late to protect pro-Palestinian speech, this feels like suppression,” the editorial board wrote. “Whatever the impetus, the decision will be taken as a paranoid response to events at Columbia and elsewhere.”

“Student groups aren’t above the rules. But the rules aren’t above the good of this campus. Harvard must choose the latter,” it added.

The University of Southern California
The Daily Trojan loudly and proudly proclaims itself to be “fiercely independent.” We therefore recognize the value and importance of free expression, especially in the face of a powerful University. It is for this reason, among others, that the Editorial Board calls for USC to allow our valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, to speak at commencement.

The Daily Trojan

Administrators at the University of Southern California drew national attention on April 16 when they canceled the graduation speech of this year’s valedictorian. The student, Asna Tabassum, had faced criticism from two campus groups because she had expressed pro-Palestinian views on social media. The school said that the decision was driven by security concerns related to “the intensity of feelings” over the conflict in the Middle East.

Three days later, the editorial board of The Daily Trojan, the student newspaper, demanded that Ms. Tabassum be allowed to speak.

The board wrote: “As USC boasts of its Arab American Heritage Month celebrations, the decision to select a Muslim student as valedictorian should be a testament to the University’s commitment to equity. But as soon as that student was found to have a view that was not palatable to some, the University’s efforts proved to be performative.”

A few paragraphs later, the board wrote: “The University claims it is not breaking any laws or guidelines by preventing Tabassum from speaking, but it is committing an act possibly even more egregious: breaking students’ trust. After failing to stand by Tabassum as she faced online vitriol and instead caving to the interests of those perpetuating that hate, it’s clear the University does not support even its best students if the decision could cause a stir.”

“That the University would deny its highest-performing student a time-honored tradition out of fear she may speak up calls into question the integrity of the education we all chose to pursue here.”

University of California, Los Angeles
At this moment, there is no greater threat than censoring student voices and falling short of guaranteeing their First Amendment rights. And if USC truly believes in its self-proclaimed value of free speech on its campus, it must reinstate Tabassum’s valedictorian speech.

Daily Bruin

On Sunday, the editorial board at the Daily Bruin, the student newspaper at the University of California, Los Angeles, also rebuked the cancellation of Ms. Tabassum’s commencement speech.

“The decision to characterize Tabassum’s valedictorian speech as a threat to public safety is an overreach on behalf of the administration,” the editorial board wrote. “Even if safety were to be a legitimate concern for USC, deploying the necessary security force at commencement should not be an issue.”

“For the administration to censor Tabassum in order to prevent any tensions from arising during commencement only puts the university in murky waters,” the board added. “The safety concern is nothing more than the anticipation of hecklers over Tabassum’s stance on the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, citing a pro-Palestinian link on Tabassum’s social media.”
 
Unlike the UK, the US still has its equivalent of the Riot Act. (Title X, chapter 13, section 254.) We need a president that remembers he's president and start telling people to GTFO.

Can't just send in the army to start shooting, you have to tell the insurgents to go home immediately first.
lmao if you think the Biden administration would ever raise a gun at its footsoldiers
70k a year?? That is an absolutely insane amount of money. I know they have scholarships and stuff but how can that be justified? For humanities subjects it’s just people talking at you. I guess for medicine you have to maintain a medical school which isn’t cheap but 70k a year for regular subjects is crazy.
Does it include lodgings?? Food? For that I’d want the knowledge beamed directly to my brain and lobster for dinner every day
You're paying for all the connections you get there, and anyone with a sense of savvy knows it.
 
Some of y'all are overestimating the appetite on the Left for this shit.

I took a quick survey of my friend group this afternoon. They're all 90% in alignment with Katie Herzog, i.e. people who considered themselves the Far Left 15 years ago. People who think Obama was too uniparty. People who were 100% in favor of Occupy. Unironic RATM listeners to this day.

The consensus was that everyone involved with shutting down classes should be expelled. No quarter.

And if you'll allow me to sperg a bit:

For people outside of California, there's a two-tier public university system in this state.

There's the University of California. The flagship is Berkeley, but LA, Davis, Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara, San Diego, and a few others are also adequate. You need a 4.0 to get into these. You don't have to be rich, Jewish, or Asian to go to these, but they're the California equivalent of the Ivies. You wash out of the UC, your life is not over.

Then there's the CSU system. This is the working class, 3.0 system. Cal Poly Humboldt, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Chico, Sonoma, East Bay, Sacramento, Fresno, Bakersfield... This is not the fancy school, this is the safety school. You can get a good education in these schools, but they're more jobs-oriented than the UCs. You wash out of the CSU and it's potentially dire.

(There are also private schools like Stanford and USC, and a robust community college system, but we're looking at 4-year public schools.)

I could see kids at a CSU beating the absolute living shit out of these assholes for robbing them of their one decent chance for a university education.

Cal Poly Humboldt is the best forestry school in the state. These people have guns and chainsaws and they know how to use them. And they're going to be mad about missing their one field trip to the lumber mill.
 
Well if it isn't the consequences of your (leftists/progs/dems) own actions in making or at least enabling.

Tell them to sit down and shut up. If they don't, arrest them and kick them out. Plenty of other, much more deserving people who want to go to these schools.

There is nobody left who can pretend to have not noticed the out of control state of higher edu and "activist culture" within. The quicker everyone remembers that political activism isn't even on the fucking list of things higher education exists for, the better. Somewhere in the 60s and 70s people erroneously started believing activism and advocacy to be an important part of education.. or part of education at all.

Even normies are noticing this now.. They can't not, no hiding your head. Maybe now we can get to the work of rebooting higher edu and cleaning it up.
 
Last edited:
Back