Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Really funny that w*men are angry men won't defend them anymore when they've put in policies that punish self-defense and the defense of others
Screenshot_20240423_215306_Brave.jpg
Really expecting men to die to defend their phone
I've been enjoying these soft man era drizzle drizzle videos.
w*men mad that they hate the shit they say but still expect it.
 
Really expecting men to die to defend their phone
Nah. I don't care if he's beating her to death. You try to help her because her boyfriend beats her face in, she grabs a rock and bashes your skull in and kills you for stopping her boyfriend from beating her. I'm not dying for any hoe. Burn in hell. If you want me to risk my life for a woman, either go out, and burn the DA who's charging Daniel's Penny's house down to the ground, or bend over and grab your ankles for me. If you're not willing to do either of those, enjoy your beating.

If I'm not fucking you, I'm not protecting you.
 
If I'm not fucking you, I'm not protecting you.
"Not my woman. Not my problem." so to speak.

Really funny that w*men are angry men won't defend them anymore when they've put in policies that punish self-defense and the defense of others
View attachment 5932678
Really expecting men to die to defend their phone

w*men mad that they hate the shit they say but still expect it.
"...fended off a thug by grabbing his gun and removing the magazine before he hopped into a getaway car with her phone."
The thug's reaction:
dreamybull_omg.gif
Also, that description makes me laugh. It sounds like: The thug takes her phone. She takes his gun. However, she doesn't threaten the thug with the gun, but just fumbles the magazine out of it as he dives into his homeboy's car. He probably had an astounded look on his face, going "Sheeeeit, if life gives ya lemons..." lmao
 
I remember quite a few pages back someone brought up the fact the woman thread had some "useful tips" last post or some shit while in here they were discussing a video of a girl getting decked in the face. After seeing the type of shit that's applauded in the other man hate thread I think that was just disingenous.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Ebonic Tutor
Nah. I don't care if he's beating her to death. You try to help her because her boyfriend beats her face in, she grabs a rock and bashes your skull in and kills you for stopping her boyfriend from beating her. I'm not dying for any hoe. Burn in hell. If you want me to risk my life for a woman, either go out, and burn the DA who's charging Daniel's Penny's house down to the ground, or bend over and grab your ankles for me. If you're not willing to do either of those, enjoy your beating.

If I'm not fucking you, I'm not protecting you.

Why would the "usual suspect" give you a dumb sticker for this post? As you exactly said, in the real world, if you try to white knight for a random hoe being abused by her boyfriend, the hoe and her boyfriend will both turn on you. There's a fucking reason the hoe ended up with the boyfriend in the first place.

The way it works is, if a girl allows you access to her vagina (in most cases, she would be your girlfriend), it is only then do you have some obligation to put your body in harm's way to protect her. And even still, it is situational (she thinks she's a strong wahmen and goes around antagonizing men twice her size until one of them loses patience with her and knocks her down with 1 single slap, then it's up to you if you want to keep her as a girlfriend or not).
 
"Not my woman. Not my problem." so to speak.

Also, that description makes me laugh. It sounds like: The thug takes her phone. She takes his gun. However, she doesn't threaten the thug with the gun, but just fumbles the magazine out of it as he dives into his homeboy's car. He probably had an astounded look on his face, going "Sheeeeit, if life gives ya lemons..." lmao
Funniest part is the gun and mag are probably worth more than the phone.

Why would the "usual suspect" give you a dumb sticker for this post? As you exactly said, in the real world, if you try to white knight for a random hoe being abused by her boyfriend, the hoe and her boyfriend will both turn on you. There's a fucking reason the hoe ended up with the boyfriend in the first place.
It's because Android Raptor wants me to defend a helpless woman getting beaten. I don't know if I can tag her here, but hopefully she sees this. She's not wrong to want that. She's absolutely right. I SHOULD be helping that woman. I SHOULDN'T let some thug ass hole beat a woman's face in. I SHOULD defend someone who's helpless. It IS the right thing to do. As a man, it is my duty to help a woman in need. But you know what? We don't live in that world anymore. And do you know why we don't live in that world? Do you know why women who don't suck are stuck fending for themselves, Android Raptor?

IT'S BECAUSE OF OTHER FUCKING WOMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


So you know who you have to blame? It's not the men who stand around and refuse to help. You can blame every hoe bag who called the cops when her nigger boyfriend beat her and tried to save her and had the guy who played hero arrested. You can blame every woman whom after getting saved by man, filed false rape charges against him. You can blame every woman who cried over her abusive bf being beaten down and blamed the man who saved them. You want to persecute the White Knights who tried to help? Great. They're gone forever. The "I DIDN'T ASK TO BE SAVED!" Hoes have put you in danger. So when a nog robs you, raped you, or is beating you to death, remember who ensured nobody is coming to rescue you. Hoes.

If you don't want some alien nog mugging you and raping you in Burgerland, you better shack up with the Chad ASAP and if you can't get Chad, then get the neck beard who carries his katana everywhere. At least he has a weapon. :story: Sure he doesn't know how to use it and it'll probably get stolen from him, but you'll have time to run away while the nog beats the neckbeard to death.
 
Last edited:
As usual, in the latest MATI stream, Null ends up (unintentionally?) making arguments about age gap relationships that just so happens to be agreeable with the feminist/female demographic. I'm not completely knowledgeable about the science behind this topic so if you smart folks of the topic of women in this thread have anything useful, please share.

Starts at 2:32:50

A superchatter asks "How old is too old to have children as a man in your opinion 40's or 50's. Currently 30 and don't want to end up raising a highly autistic child"

Null replies saying that the older a man is, the higher likelihood of autism but more importantly than just the age of the father, is the age gap between the mother and the father. If it's 10 years or more is when it "starts getting crazy." Null then uses the hypothetical example of an overconfident 40's guy who plans to "knock up 3 white bitches" (not sure why Null invokes race here) and create 9 kids. Null asserts that these kids will be "fucking retards."

null said:
"The indicator for like autism is, is not just age, it's more so age, age gap. That's why um Chris Chan is so autistic. Not only were his parents like aged, but they also have like a 15 year age gap so he came out like crazy."

Chyat offers a counterargument:
UnkindNaysayer said:
i think the autism is caused by the father not having energy to deal with the son.

null said:
"But if you're both 40, your risk (of autistic kids) is still high but not as high. So uh, 50 like like no um there's no way to have, to safely have children as a 50 year old man"

Then Null uses a 35 year old man hypothetical:

null said:
"For a man, I would say, I don't know, You should probably be at a point in your life where you're already like in a long-term relationship thinking about having kids at like 35 and you should abide by the age divided by 2 + 7 rule. So that would be ummmm 17 and a half plus 7... 20... 25... that's probably right. But I mean that's 10 years... so probably like 27. Keep it safe my homies.

So he invokes the "half your age + 7" rule and immediately contradicts his earlier statement about a 10 year age gap being a bad thing. Because using the rule, a 35 year old man can impregnate a 24.5 year old woman, an age gap of 10.5, which Null discourages. Unless Null supports both at the same time the age/2+7 rule and his seemingly arbitrary 10 year age gap rule? What real world material difference is there between impregnating a 24.5 year old and a 27 year old? How does Ghengis Khan enter the equation? He not only fucks females of all ages, he also fucks without their consent. The result? Half of the world has his DNA.

Isn't Null in his early or mid 30's? By his own standards, his clock is ticking. Last time I checked, the main interest of girls he gets are fat women who moderates his forum, fairly mentally stable but older 50+ year old women who posts on his forum, and the occasional young and skinny but BPD bitch like Elaine the Britbong who is banned from the forum. If I was him, I would seriously start looking at dating via take-down notices he receives from lolcowgirls: "Hi, I'm Josh and I'm looking for a serious relationship. I'll consider taking down your thread, maybe we can work something out :winkyface:"

Some quotes from the chyat:

KoylaDante said:

I agree, it sounds a bit like cope.

max1919 said:
max1919 said:

Not to be a redditor but source should be good especially about how the age gap factor is more important than the father age factor.

Ema_Nymton said:
This sounds like cope.

That makes 3 of us.

UgulusSneed said:
lol 50 I'd just give up

Are there any examples of 50 year old men impregnating 20 to 30 year old women and how it turned out?

nbdiptclr said:
oh no, my spermies are probably retarded

Is your spermie retarded? Or did the egg make your spermie retarded?

Are your kids retarded? Or did the classroom teacher make your kids retarded?

ONLYCORY said:
this psuedo-science bullshit

We don't even have the pseudo-science, let alone science. We only have Null's assertions right now.

mrkevinson said:
Why would you even date someone not within 10 years of you?

Because it seems arbitrary. So a 9 year, 11 month, 30 day age difference would be acceptable to you then?

LiberalsGetTheBulletToo said:
The only mute autist I know had two parents who were ~22

Maybe true but also anecdotal data of 1 so not too helpful for the bigger picture.

doodlePimp said:
Women at 40 got like 5% chance of getting pregnant naturally.

Big if true.

ZeraBP said:
Have kids as quickly as possible

That's what the boomers did post WW2. Many babies were born.

TeddyFeazer said:
i will only fuck 20 year olds, even when i'm 50

"Without condoning or condemning... I understand."
-Dr. Manhattan
 
Femcels are not real. They do not exist in any meaningful numbers. It's like trannies bringing up those poor mutated babies born with both genitals, it simply does not happen in large enough quantities to matter.

Also I'm not getting beaten up by a future scientist and his posse for your iPhone, then arrested and charged by the female DA, it's just not happening.

So I took a quick gander at the Man hate thread and came away with a couple things.
1. They hate men way, WAY more than any incel hates women
2. They absolutely DO expect you to risk your lives over their iPhones
 
Last edited:
Null then uses the hypothetical example of an overconfident 40's guy who plans to "knock up 3 white bitches" (not sure why Null invokes race here) and create 9 kids. Null asserts that these kids will be "fucking retards."
I'm not saying age isn't a factor, but I'm pretty damn sure having three baby-mommas and nine kids might be a bigger factor in why the kids would be fucked up.
 
So he invokes the "half your age + 7" rule and immediately contradicts his earlier statement about a 10 year age gap being a bad thing. Because using the rule, a 35 year old man can impregnate a 24.5 year old woman, an age gap of 10.5, which Null discourages. Unless Null supports both at the same time the age/2+7 rule and his seemingly arbitrary 10 year age gap rule? What real world material difference is there between impregnating a 24.5 year old and a 27 year old? How does Ghengis Khan enter the equation? He not only fucks females of all ages, he also fucks without their consent. The result? Half of the world has his DNA.
1. X/2+7 is about if your relationship is creepy, not fertility.
2. Soyence supports my position. Sorry if you don't like this statistic and it makes you upset, but it's true.
3. You're not Ghengis Khan, you're a faggot.

Hope this helps.
 
My dad's ten years older than my mom. Met when 26/36, married at 28/38, first kid (me) at 32/42. Only bad thing about it ever was how late my dad started having kids, me and my siblings would have longer with him otherwise. None of us are autistic or otherwise mentally ill, we all tested out in elementary school at high IQ. I do post on kiwi farms dot net so maybe you can put that down as a result
 
A superchatter asks "How old is too old to have children as a man in your opinion 40's or 50's. Currently 30 and don't want to end up raising a highly autistic child"
40s and 50s is too old to have a kid as a man. Forget the "biological clock" elements. Do you want to be getting up at 3am to put a baby back to sleep in your 40s? Shit's too tiring. Also, you don't want to be a super old dad. Teaching your son to drive when you're in your late 60s? Taking them out for a beer for the first time when you're in your 70s??

Nah, get that shit done in your 30s. I know it's fun to clown on "empty egg carton" femoids, but seriously guys shouldn't wait around just because they "can".
 
The age gap thing is retarded tho.
MMhhh actually if you're 40 + and want a child you're better off trying to do it with a 30 something women to mitigate the risk for your child
You'd need to do statistical analysis to see when the age gap and mother's age risks actually surpass one another in this situation.

Of course, most people don't minmax their relationships like a fucking video game and you get the woman you get when you wait until 40 to stop being a manchild like Juju.

Obviously it's better just to be in a position to start a family with a woman you've already been in a successful healthy relationship with for a few years by the time you're both 24. Most people aren't so lucky though.

If you're looking for me to comfort you on bad decisions, that's too bad, I'm not going to. I've noticed people in this thread tend to be older, at least two in their fifties. Nothing I say is going to make that situation better.
 
Back