Doctor Love
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2023
This is more common than not - a slim minority of countries actually have any connection to their own ancient historical monuments. Well-preserved monuments, paradoxically, mean that they are unconnected to those who built it. Look at Egypt vs the British museum - Egypt says they own Tut's legacy, despite the entire place being discovered and opened by British archaeologists. The only reason we have so much "Egyptian" works in the first place is that the local Arabs didn't have a chance to loot the fucking place because it was buried by sandstorms.Nope. In fact, they had no idea what the ruins were until the British began archaeological explorations in the region. They just plundered them for building materials.
I have pointed this out before, regarding the English Midlands - like the 100-year-old railway between Nottingham and Leicester. The newer governments, being full of conmen and credit-card-wielding retards, have no idea how to make them work - so they just leave them to decay.
It's good to use the term "displaced" rather than conquer. The white Europeans are in the process of being displaced, and it shows - we are now in the position that the people who built the Victorian-era works in England are gone, and the people living there now are unable to maintain it. Just watch - over time, the Thames will start to swallow parts of London as time goes on. Foundations will start to weather, the Thames will widen and slow.The Aryans actually displaced what many think was one of the most advanced civilizations in the world, The Indus Valley Culture, which was a flourishing, sophisticated urban society that practiced metallurgy, had houses with separate toilets and bathing areas, and actual drainage and sewer systems…all of this they were doing by 2000BCE.
Unless things change, in a few centuries you'll see Mr Pajeet fight with Mr Abawali over who was responsible for the legendary tunnels which once cut under the river.